From 79966d337c17b8e63e32463bb34cb64402a95d11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <79966d337c17b8e63e32463bb34cb64402a95d11.1599166691.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <56457dc415803c8abc5acb513ada877a79596f05.1599166690.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <56457dc415803c8abc5acb513ada877a79596f05.1599166690.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:15:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 304/333] locking/rtmutex: Clean ->pi_blocked_on in the error
 case
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.142-rt63.tar.xz

[ Upstream commit 0be4ea6e3ce693101be0fbd55a0cc7ce238ab2eb ]

The function rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() cleans ->pi_blocked_on in case
of failure (timeout, signal). The same cleanup is required in
__rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock().
In both the cases the tasks was interrupted by a signal or timeout while
acquiring the lock and after the interruption it longer blocks on the
lock.

Fixes: 1a1fb985f2e2b ("futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 2a9bf2443acc..63b3d6f306fa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -2320,6 +2320,26 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
 }
 
+static void fixup_rt_mutex_blocked(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+	/*
+	 * RT has a problem here when the wait got interrupted by a timeout
+	 * or a signal. task->pi_blocked_on is still set. The task must
+	 * acquire the hash bucket lock when returning from this function.
+	 *
+	 * If the hash bucket lock is contended then the
+	 * BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on)) in
+	 * task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() will trigger. This can be avoided by
+	 * clearing task->pi_blocked_on which removes the task from the
+	 * boosting chain of the rtmutex. That's correct because the task
+	 * is not longer blocked on it.
+	 */
+	raw_spin_lock(&tsk->pi_lock);
+	tsk->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&tsk->pi_lock);
+}
+
 /**
  * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
  * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
@@ -2392,6 +2412,9 @@ int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 
+	if (ret)
+		fixup_rt_mutex_blocked(lock);
+
 	debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -2472,7 +2495,6 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 			       struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
 			       struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
 {
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 	int ret;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
@@ -2484,23 +2506,8 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	 * have to fix that up.
 	 */
 	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
-	/*
-	 * RT has a problem here when the wait got interrupted by a timeout
-	 * or a signal. task->pi_blocked_on is still set. The task must
-	 * acquire the hash bucket lock when returning from this function.
-	 *
-	 * If the hash bucket lock is contended then the
-	 * BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on)) in
-	 * task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() will trigger. This can be avoided by
-	 * clearing task->pi_blocked_on which removes the task from the
-	 * boosting chain of the rtmutex. That's correct because the task
-	 * is not longer blocked on it.
-	 */
-	if (ret) {
-		raw_spin_lock(&tsk->pi_lock);
-		tsk->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&tsk->pi_lock);
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		fixup_rt_mutex_blocked(lock);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 
-- 
2.17.1

