From 60ce3790104726c39388b113bf9c9f022770eaa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <60ce3790104726c39388b113bf9c9f022770eaa8.1599166691.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <56457dc415803c8abc5acb513ada877a79596f05.1599166690.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <56457dc415803c8abc5acb513ada877a79596f05.1599166690.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:32:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 171/333] fs/dcache: bring back explicit INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD
 init
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.142-rt63.tar.xz

Commit 3d375d78593c ("mm: update callers to use HASH_ZERO flag") removed
INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD and uses the ZERO flag instead for the init. However
on RT we have also a spinlock which needs an init call so we can't use
that.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 fs/dcache.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 6e0022326afe..10225a9135fb 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -3060,6 +3060,8 @@ __setup("dhash_entries=", set_dhash_entries);
 
 static void __init dcache_init_early(void)
 {
+	unsigned int loop;
+
 	/* If hashes are distributed across NUMA nodes, defer
 	 * hash allocation until vmalloc space is available.
 	 */
@@ -3076,11 +3078,16 @@ static void __init dcache_init_early(void)
 					NULL,
 					0,
 					0);
+
+	for (loop = 0; loop < (1U << d_hash_shift); loop++)
+		INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(dentry_hashtable + loop);
+
 	d_hash_shift = 32 - d_hash_shift;
 }
 
 static void __init dcache_init(void)
 {
+	unsigned int loop;
 	/*
 	 * A constructor could be added for stable state like the lists,
 	 * but it is probably not worth it because of the cache nature
@@ -3104,6 +3111,10 @@ static void __init dcache_init(void)
 					NULL,
 					0,
 					0);
+
+	for (loop = 0; loop < (1U << d_hash_shift); loop++)
+		INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(dentry_hashtable + loop);
+
 	d_hash_shift = 32 - d_hash_shift;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

