From 116a588e1e4b108bfd01b5ae8de602c12aec3323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Mc Guire Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:44:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 7/7] API cleanup - use local_lock not __local_lock for soft Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.0/patches-4.0.5-rt3.tar.xz trivial API cleanup - kernel/softirq.c was mimiking local_lock. No change of functional behavior Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- kernel/softirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -464,12 +464,12 @@ void __init softirq_early_init(void) static void lock_softirq(int which) { - __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(&local_softirq_locks[which])); + local_lock(local_softirq_locks[which]); } static void unlock_softirq(int which) { - __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(&local_softirq_locks[which])); + local_unlock(local_softirq_locks[which]); } static void do_single_softirq(int which, int need_rcu_bh_qs)