From dad624b7531ae0a0275cab3c82ea0d7c6a29cc7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:57:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 032/328] signal: Revert ptrace preempt magic Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.106-rt46.tar.xz Upstream commit '53da1d9456fe7f8 fix ptrace slowness' is nothing more than a bandaid around the ptrace design trainwreck. It's not a correctness issue, it's merily a cosmetic bandaid. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/signal.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 08911bb6fe9a..5e278f1540ad 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -2103,15 +2103,7 @@ static void ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, int clear_code, siginfo_t *info) if (gstop_done && ptrace_reparented(current)) do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, false, why); - /* - * Don't want to allow preemption here, because - * sys_ptrace() needs this task to be inactive. - * - * XXX: implement read_unlock_no_resched(). - */ - preempt_disable(); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - preempt_enable_no_resched(); freezable_schedule(); } else { /* -- 2.25.1