From b76ffe4039e544a31a181ba1a921851b2427e497 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:04:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 193/279] rtmutex-futex-prepare-rt.patch Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/futex.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/rtmutex.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--- kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 80fb1c6..cecabcf 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -1423,6 +1423,16 @@ retry_private: requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2); drop_count++; continue; + } else if (ret == -EAGAIN) { + /* + * Waiter was woken by timeout or + * signal and has set pi_blocked_on to + * PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS before we + * tried to enqueue it on the rtmutex. + */ + this->pi_state = NULL; + free_pi_state(pi_state); + continue; } else if (ret) { /* -EDEADLK */ this->pi_state = NULL; @@ -2267,7 +2277,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; - struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, *hb2; union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; int res, ret; @@ -2314,20 +2324,55 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, /* Queue the futex_q, drop the hb lock, wait for wakeup. */ futex_wait_queue_me(hb, &q, to); - spin_lock(&hb->lock); - ret = handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(hb, &q, &key2, to); - spin_unlock(&hb->lock); - if (ret) - goto out_put_keys; + /* + * On RT we must avoid races with requeue and trying to block + * on two mutexes (hb->lock and uaddr2's rtmutex) by + * serializing access to pi_blocked_on with pi_lock. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + if (current->pi_blocked_on) { + /* + * We have been requeued or are in the process of + * being requeued. + */ + raw_spin_unlock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + } else { + /* + * Setting pi_blocked_on to PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS + * prevents a concurrent requeue from moving us to the + * uaddr2 rtmutex. After that we can safely acquire + * (and possibly block on) hb->lock. + */ + current->pi_blocked_on = PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS; + raw_spin_unlock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + + spin_lock(&hb->lock); + + /* + * Clean up pi_blocked_on. We might leak it otherwise + * when we succeeded with the hb->lock in the fast + * path. + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + + ret = handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(hb, &q, &key2, to); + spin_unlock(&hb->lock); + if (ret) + goto out_put_keys; + } /* - * In order for us to be here, we know our q.key == key2, and since - * we took the hb->lock above, we also know that futex_requeue() has - * completed and we no longer have to concern ourselves with a wakeup - * race with the atomic proxy lock acquisition by the requeue code. The - * futex_requeue dropped our key1 reference and incremented our key2 - * reference count. + * In order to be here, we have either been requeued, are in + * the process of being requeued, or requeue successfully + * acquired uaddr2 on our behalf. If pi_blocked_on was + * non-null above, we may be racing with a requeue. Do not + * rely on q->lock_ptr to be hb2->lock until after blocking on + * hb->lock or hb2->lock. The futex_requeue dropped our key1 + * reference and incremented our key2 reference count. */ + hb2 = hash_futex(&key2); /* Check if the requeue code acquired the second futex for us. */ if (!q.rt_waiter) { @@ -2336,9 +2381,10 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, * did a lock-steal - fix up the PI-state in that case. */ if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) { - spin_lock(q.lock_ptr); + spin_lock(&hb2->lock); + BUG_ON(&hb2->lock != q.lock_ptr); ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr2, &q, current); - spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); + spin_unlock(&hb2->lock); } } else { /* @@ -2351,7 +2397,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ret = rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter, 1); debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter); - spin_lock(q.lock_ptr); + spin_lock(&hb2->lock); + BUG_ON(&hb2->lock != q.lock_ptr); /* * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we * haven't already. diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c index 723fd3a..13b3c92 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); } +static int rt_mutex_real_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) +{ + return waiter && waiter != PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS; +} + /* * We can speed up the acquire/release, if the architecture * supports cmpxchg and if there's no debugging state to be set up @@ -196,7 +201,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we * dropped the locks. */ - if (!waiter) + if (!rt_mutex_real_waiter(waiter)) goto out_unlock_pi; /* @@ -399,6 +404,23 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, int chain_walk = 0, res; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + + /* + * In the case of futex requeue PI, this will be a proxy + * lock. The task will wake unaware that it is enqueueed on + * this lock. Avoid blocking on two locks and corrupting + * pi_blocked_on via the PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS + * flag. futex_wait_requeue_pi() sets this when it wakes up + * before requeue (due to a signal or timeout). Do not enqueue + * the task if PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS is set. + */ + if (task != current && task->pi_blocked_on == PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS) { + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); + return -EAGAIN; + } + + BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on)); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); waiter->task = task; waiter->lock = lock; @@ -423,7 +445,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters); __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); - if (owner->pi_blocked_on) + if (rt_mutex_real_waiter(owner->pi_blocked_on)) chain_walk = 1; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); } @@ -517,7 +539,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock, } __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner); - if (owner->pi_blocked_on) + if (rt_mutex_real_waiter(owner->pi_blocked_on)) chain_walk = 1; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags); @@ -551,7 +573,8 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; - if (!waiter || waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) { + if (!rt_mutex_real_waiter(waiter) || + waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) { raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); return; } diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h index 53a66c8..b43d832 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) /* * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.): */ +#define PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS ((struct rt_mutex_waiter *) 1) + extern struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock); extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *proxy_owner);