debian-packaging
/
linux
8
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity
linux/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-r...

364 lines
12 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Blame History

From e4cd05a3420e6c3cefca3fd575d1c0b318afa60b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <e4cd05a3420e6c3cefca3fd575d1c0b318afa60b.1601675152.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
References: <5b5a156f9808b1acf1205606e03da117214549ea.1601675151.git.zanussi@kernel.org>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:26:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 190/333] workqueue: Use normal rcu
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.148-rt64.tar.xz
There is no need for sched_rcu. The undocumented reason why sched_rcu
is used is to avoid a few explicit rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pairs by
abusing the fact that sched_rcu reader side critical sections are also
protected by preempt or irq disabled regions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index eef77c82d2e1..29dc939dad4e 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ enum {
*
* PL: wq_pool_mutex protected.
*
- * PR: wq_pool_mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads.
+ * PR: wq_pool_mutex protected for writes. RCU protected for reads.
*
* PW: wq_pool_mutex and wq->mutex protected for writes. Either for reads.
*
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ enum {
*
* WQ: wq->mutex protected.
*
- * WR: wq->mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads.
+ * WR: wq->mutex protected for writes. RCU protected for reads.
*
* MD: wq_mayday_lock protected.
*/
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ struct worker_pool {
atomic_t nr_running ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/*
- * Destruction of pool is sched-RCU protected to allow dereferences
+ * Destruction of pool is RCU protected to allow dereferences
* from get_work_pool().
*/
struct rcu_head rcu;
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ struct pool_workqueue {
/*
* Release of unbound pwq is punted to system_wq. See put_pwq()
* and pwq_unbound_release_workfn() for details. pool_workqueue
- * itself is also sched-RCU protected so that the first pwq can be
+ * itself is also RCU protected so that the first pwq can be
* determined without grabbing wq->mutex.
*/
struct work_struct unbound_release_work;
@@ -357,20 +357,20 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
#include <trace/events/workqueue.h>
#define assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex() \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
- "sched RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
+ "RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
- "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
+ "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
- "sched RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
+ "RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
#define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) \
for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0]; \
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
* @pool: iteration cursor
* @pi: integer used for iteration
*
- * This must be called either with wq_pool_mutex held or sched RCU read
+ * This must be called either with wq_pool_mutex held or RCU read
* locked. If the pool needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the
* caller is responsible for guaranteeing that the pool stays online.
*
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
* @pwq: iteration cursor
* @wq: the target workqueue
*
- * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
+ * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or RCU read locked.
* If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
* responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
*
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
* @wq: the target workqueue
* @node: the node ID
*
- * This must be called with any of wq_pool_mutex, wq->mutex or sched RCU
+ * This must be called with any of wq_pool_mutex, wq->mutex or RCU
* read locked.
* If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
* responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
@@ -694,8 +694,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work)
* @work: the work item of interest
*
* Pools are created and destroyed under wq_pool_mutex, and allows read
- * access under sched-RCU read lock. As such, this function should be
- * called under wq_pool_mutex or with preemption disabled.
+ * access under RCU read lock. As such, this function should be
+ * called under wq_pool_mutex or inside of a rcu_read_lock() region.
*
* All fields of the returned pool are accessible as long as the above
* mentioned locking is in effect. If the returned pool needs to be used
@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
{
if (pwq) {
/*
- * As both pwqs and pools are sched-RCU protected, the
+ * As both pwqs and pools are RCU protected, the
* following lock operations are safe.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
@@ -1228,6 +1228,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work)))
return 0;
+ rcu_read_lock();
/*
* The queueing is in progress, or it is already queued. Try to
* steal it from ->worklist without clearing WORK_STRUCT_PENDING.
@@ -1266,10 +1267,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id);
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 1;
}
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
fail:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
local_irq_restore(*flags);
if (work_is_canceling(work))
return -ENOENT;
@@ -1383,6 +1386,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) &&
WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
return;
+ rcu_read_lock();
retry:
/* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */
if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
@@ -1441,10 +1445,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
/* pwq determined, queue */
trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, pwq, work);
- if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry))) {
- spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock);
- return;
- }
+ if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry)))
+ goto out;
pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++;
work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color);
@@ -1462,7 +1464,9 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
+out:
spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/**
@@ -2863,14 +2867,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
might_sleep();
- local_irq_disable();
+ rcu_read_lock();
pool = get_work_pool(work);
if (!pool) {
- local_irq_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return false;
}
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
/* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */
pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
if (pwq) {
@@ -2902,10 +2906,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
}
-
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return true;
already_gone:
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return false;
}
@@ -3352,7 +3357,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu)
* put_unbound_pool - put a worker_pool
* @pool: worker_pool to put
*
- * Put @pool. If its refcnt reaches zero, it gets destroyed in sched-RCU
+ * Put @pool. If its refcnt reaches zero, it gets destroyed in RCU
* safe manner. get_unbound_pool() calls this function on its failure path
* and this function should be able to release pools which went through,
* successfully or not, init_worker_pool().
@@ -3406,8 +3411,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer);
del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer);
- /* sched-RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */
- call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
+ /* RCU protected to allow dereferences from get_work_pool() */
+ call_rcu(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
}
/**
@@ -3514,14 +3519,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
put_unbound_pool(pool);
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
- call_rcu_sched(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq);
+ call_rcu(&pwq->rcu, rcu_free_pwq);
/*
* If we're the last pwq going away, @wq is already dead and no one
* is gonna access it anymore. Schedule RCU free.
*/
if (is_last)
- call_rcu_sched(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
+ call_rcu(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
}
/**
@@ -4221,7 +4226,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
* The base ref is never dropped on per-cpu pwqs. Directly
* schedule RCU free.
*/
- call_rcu_sched(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
+ call_rcu(&wq->rcu, rcu_free_wq);
} else {
/*
* We're the sole accessor of @wq at this point. Directly
@@ -4331,7 +4336,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
bool ret;
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ preempt_disable();
if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -4342,7 +4348,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works);
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ preempt_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -4368,15 +4375,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
if (work_pending(work))
ret |= WORK_BUSY_PENDING;
- local_irq_save(flags);
+ rcu_read_lock();
pool = get_work_pool(work);
if (pool) {
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
if (find_worker_executing_work(pool, work))
ret |= WORK_BUSY_RUNNING;
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
}
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -4561,7 +4568,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
unsigned long flags;
int pi;
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ rcu_read_lock();
pr_info("Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:\n");
@@ -4626,7 +4633,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/* used to show worker information through /proc/PID/{comm,stat,status} */
@@ -5013,16 +5020,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
* nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe
* to peek without lock.
*/
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(pwq->nr_active < 0);
if (pwq->nr_active) {
busy = true;
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
goto out_unlock;
}
}
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -5217,7 +5224,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
const char *delim = "";
int node, written = 0;
- rcu_read_lock_sched();
+ get_online_cpus();
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_node(node) {
written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written,
"%s%d:%d", delim, node,
@@ -5225,7 +5233,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
delim = " ";
}
written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n");
- rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ put_online_cpus();
return written;
}
--
2.17.1
View Git Blame Copy Permalink