odoo
/
odoo
2
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Activity

[IMP]: purchase: Improved xml_id reference of purchase orders 

bzr revid: rpa@tinyerp.com-20120711170758-52xt4mgjltod650b
This commit is contained in:
Rucha (Open ERP) 2012-07-11 22:37:58 +05:30
parent bed063e0df
commit 3612035b2e
12 changed files with 55 additions and 55 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
addons/purchase/purchase_demo.xml
View File

@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
<field eval="[(4, ref('group_purchase_user'))]" name="groups_id"/>
</record>
<workflow action="purchase_confirm" model="purchase.order" ref="order_purchase2"/>
<workflow action="purchase_confirm" model="purchase.order" ref="order_purchase6"/>
<workflow action="purchase_confirm" model="purchase.order" ref="purchase_order_2"/>
<workflow action="purchase_confirm" model="purchase.order" ref="purchase_order_6"/>
<record id="stock.res_company_1" model="res.company">
<field eval="1.0" name="po_lead"/>

16
addons/purchase/purchase_order_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase1}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_1}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_1
invoice_method: order
order_line:
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
product_qty: 4.0
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase2}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_2}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_3
invoice_method: picking
order_line:
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
product_qty: 5
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase3}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_3}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_12
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_2
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
product_qty: 10.0
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase4}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_4}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_4
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_14
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
product_qty: 7.0
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase5}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_5}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_19
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_22
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
product_qty: 3
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase6}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_6}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_22
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_38
@ -71,8 +71,8 @@
price_unit: 154.5
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase7}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_16
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_7}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_4
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_12
product_qty: 5

20
addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
View File

@ -3,52 +3,52 @@
-
I confirm the purchase order.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase4}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_4}
-
I check the "Approved" status after confirmed RFQ.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase4}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_4}:
- state == 'approved'
-
First I cancel receptions related to this order if order shipped.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase4"))
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_4"))
self.pool.get('stock.picking').action_cancel(cr, uid, [picking.id for picking in order.picking_ids])
-
I check order status in "Shipping Exception".
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase4"))
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_4"))
assert order.state == "except_picking", "order should be in Ship Exception state after cancel shipment"
-
Now I am able to cancel purchase order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")])
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_4")])
-
I check that order is cancelled.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase4}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_4}:
- state == 'cancel'
-
After cancel the order, I check that it's related invoice cancelled.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase4"))
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_4"))
assert order.invoice_ids[0].state == "cancel", "order's related invoice should be cancelled"
-
Now again set cancelled order to draft.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
self.action_cancel_draft(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")])
self.action_cancel_draft(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_4")])
-
Now I again to cancel draft order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")])
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_4")])
-
I check that order is cancelled.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase4}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_4}:
- state == 'cancel'

8
addons/purchase/test/process/generate_invoice_from_reception.yml
View File

@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-
I confirm another order where invoice control is 'Bases on incoming shipments'.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase2}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_2}
-
I check that the invoice of order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase2"))
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_2"))
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 0, "Invoice should not be generated on order confirmation."
-
Now I create an invoice for order on reception.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
pick_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('purchase_id','=',ref('order_purchase2'))])
pick_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('purchase_id','=',ref('purchase_order_2'))])
self.action_invoice_create(cr, uid, pick_ids, ref('account.expenses_journal'))
-
I check that the invoice of order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase2"))
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_2"))
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."

8
addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
View File

@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
-
I confirm purchase order which has invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase6}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_6}
-
In order to test create invoice for purchase order line.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
invoice_line_obj = self.pool.get('purchase.order.line_invoice')
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase6"))
context.update({'active_model': 'purchase.order', 'active_ids': [ref("order_purchase6")]})
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_6"))
context.update({'active_model': 'purchase.order', 'active_ids': [ref("purchase_order_6")]})
for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
invoice_line_obj.makeInvoices(cr, uid, purchase_line.id, context=context)
-
I check the invoice of order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase6"))
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_6"))
for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
-

6
addons/purchase/test/process/merge_order.yml
View File

@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
In order to merge RFQ, I merge two RFQ which has same supplier and check new merged order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
new_id = self.do_merge(cr, uid, [ref('order_purchase3'), ref('order_purchase7')])
order3 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('order_purchase3'))
order7 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('order_purchase7'))
new_id = self.do_merge(cr, uid, [ref('purchase_order_4'), ref('purchase_order_7')])
order3 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('purchase_order_4'))
order7 = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('purchase_order_7'))
total_qty = sum([x.product_qty for x in order3.order_line] + [x.product_qty for x in order7.order_line])
assert order3.state == 'cancel', "Merged order should be canceled"

18
addons/purchase/test/process/rfq2order2done.yml
View File

@ -3,22 +3,22 @@
-
I check the total untaxed amount of the RFQ is correctly computed
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase1, string: The amount of RFQ is not correctly computed}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_1, string: The amount of RFQ is not correctly computed}:
- sum([l.price_subtotal for l in order_line]) == amount_untaxed
-
I confirm the RFQ.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase1}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_1}
-
I check the "Approved" status after confirmed RFQ.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase1}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_1}:
- state == 'approved'
-
I check that the invoice details which is generated after confirmed RFQ.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1"))
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1"))
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) >= 1, "Invoice is not generated more or less than one"
for invoice in purchase_order.invoice_ids:
assert invoice.state == "draft", "Invoice state should be draft"
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
I check that Reception details after confirmed RFQ.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1"))
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1"))
assert len(purchase_order.picking_ids) >= 1, "You should have only one reception order"
for picking in purchase_order.picking_ids:
assert picking.state == "assigned", "Reception state should be in assigned state"
@ -46,21 +46,21 @@
Reception is ready for process so now done the reception.
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking}: |
pick_ids = self.pool.get('purchase.order').browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1")).picking_ids
pick_ids = self.pool.get('purchase.order').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1")).picking_ids
partial_id = self.create(cr, uid, {},context={'active_model': 'stock.picking','active_ids': [pick_ids[0].id]})
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [partial_id])
-
I check that purchase order is shipped.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
assert self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1")).shipped == True,"Purchase order should be delivered"
assert self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1")).shipped == True,"Purchase order should be delivered"
-
I Validate Invoice of Purchase Order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
import netsvc
invoice_ids = [x.id for x in self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1")).invoice_ids]
invoice_ids = [x.id for x in self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1")).invoice_ids]
wf_service = netsvc.LocalService("workflow")
for invoice in invoice_ids:
wf_service.trg_validate(uid, 'account.invoice', invoice, 'invoice_open', cr)
@ -68,5 +68,5 @@
I check that purchase order is invoiced.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
assert self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase1")).invoiced == True,"Purchase Order should be invoiced"
assert self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_1")).invoiced == True,"Purchase Order should be invoiced"

6
addons/purchase/test/ui/delete_order.yml
View File

@ -5,18 +5,18 @@
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
try:
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase1")])
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_1")])
except Exception,e:
pass
-
I delete a draft order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase5")])
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_5")])
-
I delete a cancelled order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase7")])
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_order_7")])

4
addons/purchase/test/ui/duplicate_order.yml
View File

@ -4,5 +4,5 @@
I duplicate order.
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
context.update({'active_id':ref('order_purchase1')})
self.copy(cr, uid, ref('order_purchase1'), context)
context.update({'active_id':ref('purchase_order_1')})
self.copy(cr, uid, ref('purchase_order_1'), context)

4
addons/purchase/test/ui/print_report.yml
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
import netsvc, tools, os
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.purchase.quotation').create(cr, uid, [ref('purchase.order_purchase1'),ref('purchase.order_purchase2')], {}, {})
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.purchase.quotation').create(cr, uid, [ref('purchase.purchase_order_1'),ref('purchase.purchase_order_2')], {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'purchase-request_quotation'+format), 'wb+').write(data)
-
@ -11,6 +11,6 @@
-
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
import netsvc, tools, os
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.purchase.order').create(cr, uid, [ref('purchase.order_purchase1'),ref('purchase.order_purchase2')], {}, {})
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.purchase.order').create(cr, uid, [ref('purchase.purchase_order_1'),ref('purchase.purchase_order_2')], {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'purchase-purchase_order_report'+format), 'wb+').write(data)

4
addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_11}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_12
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_6
product_qty: 10
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_12}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_22
order_line:
- product_id: product.product_product_12

12
addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
View File

@ -9,28 +9,28 @@
-
In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_11}
-
I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation it should not an Approve state.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should not be in Approved state.}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should not be in Approved state.}:
- state != 'approved'
-
I Approved the purchase order.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase11}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: purchase_order_11}
-
I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
- state == 'approved'
-
I confirmed the purchase order of amount of less than Limit amount.
-
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_12}
-
I check that the order is in approved state.
-
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_12, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
- state == 'approved'