[FIX] purchase: updating existing PO should keep origin
When a make to order product is sold, a purchase order is created or added to an existing one. In the second case, the origin of the sale order was lost. It is now added to the existing source. opw 656688
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cd03ed7fe
commit
44eeb387d3
|
@ -1506,9 +1506,12 @@ class procurement_order(osv.osv):
|
|||
if available_draft_po_ids:
|
||||
po_id = available_draft_po_ids[0]
|
||||
po_rec = po_obj.browse(cr, uid, po_id, context=context)
|
||||
|
||||
po_to_update = {'origin': po_rec.origin and ', '.join([po_rec.origin, procurement.origin]) or procurement.origin}
|
||||
#if the product has to be ordered earlier those in the existing PO, we replace the purchase date on the order to avoid ordering it too late
|
||||
if datetime.strptime(po_rec.date_order, DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT) > purchase_date:
|
||||
po_obj.write(cr, uid, [po_id], {'date_order': purchase_date.strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)}, context=context)
|
||||
po_to_update.update({'date_order': purchase_date.strftime(DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT)})
|
||||
po_obj.write(cr, uid, [po_id], po_to_update, context=context)
|
||||
#look for any other PO line in the selected PO with same product and UoM to sum quantities instead of creating a new po line
|
||||
available_po_line_ids = po_line_obj.search(cr, uid, [('order_id', '=', po_id), ('product_id', '=', line_vals['product_id']), ('product_uom', '=', line_vals['product_uom'])], context=context)
|
||||
if available_po_line_ids:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue