odoo
/
odoo
2
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Activity

[MERGE] refactoring of tests to be executed as normal users instead of administrator, fixed some security rules 

bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20130912085812-xvmjoa5fjis0l2ws
This commit is contained in:
Martin Trigaux 2013-09-12 10:58:12 +02:00
parent d2e389900a bed4a740d4
commit ab7d8c4ccf
95 changed files with 1232 additions and 345 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
addons/account/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ for a particular financial year and for preparation of vouchers there is a modul
'account_unit_test.xml',
],
'test': [
'test/account_test_users.yml',
'test/account_customer_invoice.yml',
'test/account_supplier_invoice.yml',
'test/account_change_currency.yml',

10
addons/account/test/account_customer_invoice.yml
View File

@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
-
In order to test account invoice I create a new customer invoice
-
I will create bank detail
I will create bank detail with using manager access rights because account manager can only create bank details.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_manager'
-
!record {model: res.partner.bank, id: res_partner_bank_0}:
state: bank
@ -11,6 +14,11 @@
footer: True
bank: base.res_bank_1
bank_name: Reserve
-
Test with that user which have rights to make Invoicing and payment and who is accountant.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_user'
-
I create a customer invoice
-

5
addons/account/test/account_invoice_state.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Test with that user which have rights to make Invoicing.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_user'
-
In order to test Confirm Draft Invoice wizard I create an invoice and confirm it with this wizard
-

5
addons/account/test/account_supplier_invoice.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Test with that Finance manager who can only create supplier invoice.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_manager'
-
In order to test account invoice I create a new supplier invoice
-

32
addons/account/test/account_test_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
-
Create a user as 'Accountant'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Accountant
login: acc
password: acc
email: accountuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Accountant.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_user}:
groups_id:
- account.group_account_user
- base.group_partner_manager
-
Create a user as 'Financial Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Financial Manager
login: fm
password: fm
email: accountmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Financial Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_manager}:
groups_id:
- account.group_account_manager
- base.group_partner_manager

5
addons/account/test/account_validate_account_move.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Test validate account move with user who is accountant which have its rights.'
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_user'
-
In order to test the account move lines in OpenERP, I create account move
-

1
addons/account_voucher/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ This module manages:
'account_voucher_data.xml',
],
'test' : [
'test/account_voucher_users.yml',
'test/case5_suppl_usd_usd.yml',
'test/account_voucher.yml',
'test/sales_receipt.yml',

6
addons/account_voucher/test/account_voucher.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
-
I check the voucher module with user who is accountant.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_voucher_user'
-
In order to check account voucher module in OpenERP I create a customer voucher
-

32
addons/account_voucher/test/account_voucher_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
-
Create a user as 'Accountant for account voucher'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_voucher_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Voucher Accountant
login: vacc
password: acc
email: accountant@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups to Accountant for account voucher.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_voucher_user}:
groups_id:
- base.group_partner_manager
- account.group_account_user
-
Create a user as 'Financial Manager for account voucher'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_voucher_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Financial Manager for voucher
login: fmv
password: fmv
email: finmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups to Financial Manager for account voucher.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_account_voucher_manager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_partner_manager
- account.group_account_manager

5
addons/account_voucher/test/case_eur_usd.yml
View File

@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
##YAML test on the account_voucher as depicted in this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/954155
-
Only manager can create and take decision about bank and currency there I checkd this test with user who is finance manager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_voucher_manager'
-
In order to check the payment with multi-currency in OpenERP,
I create an invoice in EUR and make payment in USD based on the currency rating.

5
addons/account_voucher/test/sales_payment.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
I test sales payment with user who is accountant.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_voucher_user'
-
Create an invoice for the partner Seagate with amount 450.0
-

5
addons/account_voucher/test/sales_receipt.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Accountant can also be created receipt and validate it there for I checked it with that user who is accountant.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_account_voucher_user'
-
Creating a Voucher Receipt for partner Seagate with amount 30000.0
-

1
addons/crm/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ Dashboard for CRM will include:
'crm_action_rule_demo.xml',
],
'test': [
'test/crm_access_group_users.yml',
'test/crm_lead_message.yml',
'test/lead2opportunity2win.yml',
'test/lead2opportunity_assign_salesmen.yml',

1
addons/crm/security/crm_security.xml
View File

@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
<record id="base.group_sale_salesman" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">User: Own Leads Only</field>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_sales_management"/>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
<field name="comment">the user will have access to his own data in the sales application.</field>
</record>

31
addons/crm/test/crm_access_group_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
-
Create a user as 'Crm Salesmanager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: crm_res_users_salesmanager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Crm Sales manager
login: csm
password: csm
email: crmmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Crm Salesmanager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: crm_res_users_salesmanager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_manager
-
Create a user as 'Crm Salesman'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: crm_res_users_salesman}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Crm Salesman
login: csu
password: csu
email: crmuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Crm Salesman.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: crm_res_users_salesman}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_salesman_all_leads
- base.group_partner_manager

11
addons/crm/test/crm_lead_cancel.yml
View File

@ -1,21 +1,24 @@
-
I set a new sale team (with Marketing at parent) .
I set a new sale team (with Marketing at parent) giving access rights of salesman.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesmanager'
-
!python {model: crm.lead}: |
section_id = self.pool.get('crm.case.section').create(cr, uid, {'name': "Phone Marketing", 'parent_id': ref("crm.crm_case_section_2")})
self.write(cr, uid, [ref("crm_case_1")], {'section_id': section_id})
-
I check unqualified lead .
Salesman check unqualified lead .
-
!assert {model: crm.lead, id: crm.crm_case_1, string: Lead is in new stage}:
- stage_id.sequence == 1
-
I escalate the lead to parent team.
Salesman escalate the lead to parent team.
-
!python {model: crm.lead}: |
self.case_escalate(cr, uid, [ref("crm_case_1")])
-
I check the lead is correctly escalated to the parent team.
Salesman check the lead is correctly escalated to the parent team.
-
!assert {model: crm.lead, id: crm.crm_case_1, string: Escalate lead to parent team}:
- section_id.name == "Marketing"

6
addons/crm/test/crm_lead_merge.yml
View File

@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
-
During a mixed merge (involving leads and opps), data should be handled a certain way following their type (m2o, m2m, text, ...) Start by creating two leads and an opp.
During a mixed merge (involving leads and opps), data should be handled a certain way following their type (m2o, m2m, text, ...) Start by creating two leads and an opp and giving the rights of Sales manager.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesmanager'
-
!record {model: crm.lead, id: test_crm_opp_1}:
type: 'opportunity'

5
addons/crm/test/crm_lead_message.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give the access rights of Salesman to communicate with customer.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesman'
-
Customer interested in our product, so he sends request by email to get more details.
-

9
addons/crm/test/crm_lead_onchange.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
I create a lead record to call a partner onchange, stage onchange and mailing opt-in onchange method.
Sales manager create a lead record to call a partner onchange, stage onchange and mailing opt-in onchange method.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesmanager'
-
!record {model: crm.lead, id: crm_case_25}:
name: 'Need more info about your pc2'
@ -7,7 +10,7 @@
type: opportunity
stage_id: crm.stage_lead1
-
I create a lead record to call a mailing opt-out onchange method.
Sales manager create a lead record to call a mailing opt-out onchange method.
-
!record {model: crm.lead, id: crm_case_18}:
name: 'Need 20 Days of Consultancy'
@ -15,7 +18,7 @@
stage_id: crm.stage_lead1
opt_out: True
-
I create a phonecall record to call a partner onchange method.
Sales manager create a phonecall record to call a partner onchange method.
-
!record {model: crm.phonecall, id: crm_phonecall_5}:
name: 'Bad time'

5
addons/crm/test/crm_lead_unlink.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
I Unlink the Lead.
Only Sales manager Unlink the Lead so test with Manager's access rights'.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesmanager'
-
!python {model: crm.lead}: |
self.unlink(cr, uid, [ref("crm_case_4")])

5
addons/crm/test/lead2opportunity2win.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Giving access rights of salesman to convert the lead into opportunity.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesman'
-
In order to test the conversion of a lead into a opportunity,
-

49
addons/crm/test/lead2opportunity_assign_salesmen.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,30 @@
-
During a lead to opp conversion, salesmen should be assigned to leads following the round-robin method. Start by creating 6 leads (1 to 6) and 4 salesmen (A to D).
During a lead to opp conversion, salesmen should be assigned to leads following the round-robin method. Start by creating 4 salesmen (A to D) and 6 leads (1 to 6).
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_01}:
name: 'Test user A'
login: 'tua'
new_password: 'tua'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_02}:
name: 'Test user B'
login: 'tub'
new_password: 'tub'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_03}:
name: 'Test user C'
login: 'tuc'
new_password: 'tuc'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_04}:
name: 'Test user D'
login: 'tud'
new_password: 'tud'
-
Salesman also creates lead so giving access rights of salesman.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesman'
-
!record {model: crm.lead, id: test_crm_lead_01}:
type: 'lead'
@ -37,27 +62,7 @@
partner_name: 'Agrolait SuperSeed SA'
stage_id: stage_lead1
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_01}:
name: 'Test user A'
login: 'tua'
new_password: 'tua'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_02}:
name: 'Test user B'
login: 'tub'
new_password: 'tub'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_03}:
name: 'Test user C'
login: 'tuc'
new_password: 'tuc'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: test_res_user_04}:
name: 'Test user D'
login: 'tud'
new_password: 'tud'
-
I create a mass convert wizard and convert all the leads.
Salesman create a mass convert wizard and convert all the leads.
-
!python {model: crm.lead2opportunity.partner.mass}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'crm.lead', 'active_ids': [ref("test_crm_lead_01"), ref("test_crm_lead_02"), ref("test_crm_lead_03"), ref("test_crm_lead_04"), ref("test_crm_lead_05"), ref("test_crm_lead_06")], 'active_id': ref("test_crm_lead_01")})

5
addons/crm/test/phonecalls.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Salesman check the phone calls data so test with the access rights of salesman.
-
!context
uid: 'crm_res_users_salesman'
-
I schedule a phone call with a customer.
-

2
addons/event/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Key Features
'email_template.xml',
],
'demo': ['event_demo.xml'],
'test': ['test/process/event_draft2done.yml'],
'test': ['test/ui/event_users.yml','test/process/event_draft2done.yml'],
'css': ['static/src/css/event.css'],
'installable': True,
'application': True,

1
addons/event/security/event_security.xml
View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
<record id="group_event_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">User</field>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
<field name="category_id" ref="module_category_event_management"/>
</record>

5
addons/event/test/process/event_draft2done.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give the access rights of Event user to organize an event and also do registration.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_eventuser'
-
I want to organize an event,
into this conference I should create two registration.

30
addons/event/test/ui/event_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Event manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_eventmanager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Event manager
login: em
password: em
email: eventmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Event manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_eventmanager}:
groups_id:
- event.group_event_manager
-
Create a user as 'Event user'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_eventuser}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: User
login: eu
password: eu
email: eventuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Event user.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_eventuser}:
groups_id:
- event.group_event_user

1
addons/hr/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ You can manage:
],
'demo': ['hr_demo.xml'],
'test': [
'test/hr_users.yml',
'test/open2recruit2close_job.yml',
'test/hr_demo.yml',
],

5
addons/hr/test/hr_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give the access rights of Hr Officer to create employee.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_hr_officer'
-
!record {model: hr.job, id: job_developer, view: False}:
no_of_employee: 0.0

42
addons/hr/test/hr_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
-
Create a user as 'HR Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR manager
login: hrm
password: hrm
-
I added groups for HR Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_manager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_manager
-
Create a user as 'HR Officer'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_officer}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR Officer
login: hro
password: hro
-
I added groups for HR Officer.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_officer}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_user
-
Create a user as 'Employee'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_employee}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Employee
login: emp
password: emp
-
I added groups for Employee.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_employee}:
groups_id:
- base.group_user

5
addons/hr/test/open2recruit2close_job.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give the access rights of Hr Officer to the user to test the process of Human Resource Management.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_hr_officer'
-
In order to test the process of Human Resource Management, I open Job Postion for "Developer".
-

19
addons/hr_attendance/test/attendance_process.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
-
Create a user as 'HR Attendance Officer'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_attendance_officer}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR Officer
login: ao
password: ao
-
I added groups for HR Attendance Officer.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_attendance_officer}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_user
-
Give the access rights of Hr Officer to test attendance process.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_attendance_officer'
-
In order to test attendance process in OpenERP, I entry of SignIn of employee.
-

7
addons/hr_holidays/security/ir_rule.xml
View File

@ -15,5 +15,12 @@
<field name="groups" eval="[(4,ref('base.group_hr_user'))]"/>
</record>
<record id="resource_leaves_officer" model="ir.rule">
<field name="name">Leaves Officer</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_resource_calendar_leaves"/>
<field name="domain_force">[(1,'=',1)]</field>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4,ref('base.group_hr_user'))]"/>
</record>
</data>
</openerp>

3
addons/hr_recruitment/security/hr_recruitment_security.xml
View File

@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
<field name="domain_force">['|',('company_id','=',False),('company_id','child_of',[user.company_id.id])]</field>
</record>
<record id="base.group_hr_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_survey_user'))]"/>
</record>
</data>
</openerp>

20
addons/hr_recruitment/test/recruitment_process.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
-
In Order to test process of Recruitment,
Create a user as 'HR Recruitment Officer'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_recruitment_officer}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR Recruitment Officer
login: hrro
password: hrro
email: hrofcr@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for HR Recruitment Officer.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_hr_recruitment_officer}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_user
-
In Order to test process of Recruitment so giving HR officer's rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_hr_recruitment_officer'
-
An applicant is interested in the job position. So he sends a resume by email.
-

1
addons/hr_timesheet/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ up a management by affair.
],
'demo': ['hr_timesheet_demo.xml'],
'test': [
'test/hr_timesheet_users.yml',
'test/test_hr_timesheet.yml',
'test/hr_timesheet_report.yml',
'test/hr_timesheet_demo.yml',

5
addons/hr_timesheet/test/hr_timesheet_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give the access rights of Hr Officer to create employee.
-
!context
uid: 'res_hr_timesheet_officer'
-
!record {model: hr.analytic.timesheet, id: working_hours_coding, view: False}:
user_id: base.user_demo

42
addons/hr_timesheet/test/hr_timesheet_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
-
Create a user as 'HR timesheet Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR timesheet manager
login: hrtm
password: hrtm
-
I added groups for HR timesheet Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_manager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_manager
-
Create a user as 'HR timesheet Officer'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_officer}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: HR timesheet Officer
login: hrto
password: hrto
-
I added groups for HR timesheet Officer.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_officer}:
groups_id:
- base.group_hr_user
-
Create a user as 'Timesheet Employee'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_employee}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Timesheet Employee
login: empt
password: empt
-
I added groups for Timesheet Employee.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_hr_timesheet_employee}:
groups_id:
- base.group_user

10
addons/hr_timesheet/test/test_hr_timesheet.yml
View File

@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
-
In order to test hr_timesheet Module in OpenERP, I make "Sign In/Sign Out for Project" to encode and
track time spent on the different projects.
-
Give the access rights of Hr Officer to create employee.
-
!context
uid: 'res_hr_timesheet_officer'
-
I create employee "Gilles Gravie" as "User".
-
@ -9,6 +14,11 @@
name: Gilles Gravie
parent_id: 'hr.employee_al'
user_id: 'base.user_demo'
-
Give the access rights of Employee to Sign In/Sign Out in Project.
-
!context
uid: 'res_hr_timesheet_employee'
-
On "Sign In/Sign Out by Project" wizard i click on "Sign In/Sign Out" button of this wizard.
-

1
addons/mrp/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ Dashboard / Reports for MRP will include:
#TODO: This yml tests are needed to be completely reviewed again because the product wood panel is removed in product demo as it does not suit for new demo context of computer and consultant company
# so the ymls are too complex to change at this stage
'test': [
'test/mrp_users.yml',
'test/order_demo.yml',
'test/order_process.yml',
'test/cancel_order.yml',

9
addons/mrp/mrp.py
View File

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ from openerp.osv import fields, osv, orm
from openerp.tools import DEFAULT_SERVER_DATETIME_FORMAT, DATETIME_FORMATS_MAP
from openerp.tools import float_compare
from openerp.tools.translate import _
from openerp import tools
from openerp import tools, SUPERUSER_ID
from openerp import SUPERUSER_ID
#----------------------------------------------------------
@ -817,7 +817,10 @@ class mrp_production(osv.osv):
account = wc.costs_hour_account_id.id
if value and account:
amount += value
analytic_line_obj.create(cr, uid, {
# we user SUPERUSER_ID as we do not garantee an mrp user
# has access to account analytic lines but still should be
# able to produce orders
analytic_line_obj.create(cr, SUPERUSER_ID, {
'name': wc_line.name + ' (H)',
'amount': value,
'account_id': account,
@ -833,7 +836,7 @@ class mrp_production(osv.osv):
account = wc.costs_cycle_account_id.id
if value and account:
amount += value
analytic_line_obj.create(cr, uid, {
analytic_line_obj.create(cr, SUPERUSER_ID, {
'name': wc_line.name+' (C)',
'amount': value,
'account_id': account,

1
addons/mrp/security/mrp_security.xml
View File

@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
<record id="group_mrp_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">User</field>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_manufacturing"/>
</record>
<record id="group_mrp_manager" model="res.groups">

5
addons/mrp/test/cancel_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
MRP user can cancelled Production Order, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_mrp_user'
-
I first confirm order for PC Assemble SC349.
-

31
addons/mrp/test/mrp_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
-
Create a user as 'MRP Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_mrp_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: MRP Manager
login: mam
password: mam
email: mrp_manager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for MRP Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_mrp_manager}:
groups_id:
- mrp.group_mrp_manager
- account.group_account_user
-
Create a user as 'MRP User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_mrp_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: MRP User
login: mau
password: mau
email: mrp_user@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for MRP User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_mrp_user}:
groups_id:
- mrp.group_mrp_user

5
addons/mrp/test/order_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
MRP user can create Production Order, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_mrp_user'
-
I create Production Order of PC Assemble SC349 to produce 5.0 Unit.
-

34
addons/mrp/test/order_process.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
MRP user can doing all process related to Production Order, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_mrp_user'
-
I compute the production order.
-
@ -23,6 +28,7 @@
I confirm the Production Order.
-
!workflow {model: mrp.production, action: button_confirm, ref: mrp_production_test1}
-
I check details of Produce Move of Production Order to trace Final Product.
-
@ -58,6 +64,16 @@
assert move_line.product_uos.id == order_line.product_uos.id, "UOS is not correspond in 'To consume line'."
assert move_line.location_id.id == routing_loc or order.location_src_id.id, "Source location is not correspond in 'To consume line'."
assert move_line.location_dest_id.id == source_location_id, "Destination Location is not correspond in 'To consume line'."
-
I consume raw materials and put one material in scrap location due to waste it.
-
!python {model: mrp.production}: |
scrap_location_ids = self.pool.get('stock.location').search(cr, uid, [('scrap_location','=',True)])
scrap_location_id = scrap_location_ids[0]
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("mrp_production_test1"))
for move in order.move_lines:
if move.product_id.id == ref("product.product_product_6"):
move.action_scrap(5.0, scrap_location_id)
-
I check details of an Internal Shipment after confirmed production order to bring components in Raw Materials Location.
-
@ -155,17 +171,7 @@
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("mrp_production_test1"))
assert order.state == 'in_production', 'Production order should be in production State.'
-
I consume raw materials and put one material in scrap location due to waste it.
-
!python {model: mrp.production}: |
scrap_location_ids = self.pool.get('stock.location').search(cr, uid, [('scrap_location','=',True)])
scrap_location_id = scrap_location_ids[0]
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("mrp_production_test1"))
for move in order.move_lines:
if move.product_id.id == ref("product.product_product_6"):
move.action_scrap(5.0, scrap_location_id)
move.action_consume(move.product_qty)
-
I produce product.
-
!python {model: mrp.product.produce}: |
@ -183,7 +189,10 @@
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("mrp_production_test1"))
assert order.state == 'done', "Production order should be closed."
-
I check Total Costs at End of Production.
I check Total Costs at End of Production as a manager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_mrp_manager'
-
!python {model: mrp.production}: |
order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("mrp_production_test1"))
@ -217,6 +226,9 @@
assert line.product_uom_id.id == wc.product_id.uom_id.id, "UOM is not correspond."
-
I print a "BOM Structure".
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_mrp_user'
-
!python {model: mrp.production}: |
import os

2
addons/mrp_operations/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ So, that we can compare the theoretic delay and real delay.
'mrp_operations_demo.yml'
],
'test': [
# 'test/workcenter_operations.yml',
'test/workcenter_operations.yml',
],
'installable': True,
'auto_install': False,

24
addons/mrp_operations/test/workcenter_operations.yml
View File

@ -1,6 +1,24 @@
-
Create a user as 'MRP User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_operation_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: MRP User
login: maou
password: maou
email: mrp_operation_user@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for MRP User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_operation_user}:
groups_id:
- mrp.group_mrp_user
-
In order to test mrp_operations with OpenERP, I refer created production order of PC Assemble SC349
with routing - Manual Component's Assembly to test complete production process with respect of workcenter.
with routing - Manual Component's Assembly to test complete production process with respect of workcenter with giving access rights of MRP User.
-
!context
uid: 'res_mrp_operation_user'
-
I compute the production order.
-
@ -92,7 +110,7 @@
I print a Barcode Report of Operation line.
-
!python {model: mrp_operations.operation.code}: |
import netsvc, tools, os
from openerp import netsvc, tools
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.mrp.code.barcode').create(cr, uid, [ref('mrp_operations.mrp_op_1'),ref('mrp_operations.mrp_op_2'),ref('mrp_operations.mrp_op_3'),ref('mrp_operations.mrp_op_4'),ref('mrp_operations.mrp_op_5')], {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'mrp_operations-barcode_report.'+format), 'wb+').write(data)
@ -101,7 +119,7 @@
I print Workcenter's Barcode Report.
-
!python {model: mrp.workcenter}: |
import netsvc, tools, os
from openerp import netsvc, tools
(data, format) = netsvc.LocalService('report.mrp.wc.barcode').create(cr, uid, [ref('mrp.mrp_workcenter_0'),ref('mrp.mrp_workcenter_1')], {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'mrp_operations-workcenter_barcode_report.'+format), 'wb+').write(data)

3
addons/mrp_repair/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ The following topics should be covered by this module:
'mrp_repair_report.xml',
],
'demo': ['mrp_repair_demo.yml'],
'test': ['test/test_mrp_repair_noneinv.yml',
'test': ['test/mrp_repair_users.yml',
'test/test_mrp_repair_noneinv.yml',
'test/test_mrp_repair_b4inv.yml',
'test/test_mrp_repair_afterinv.yml',
'test/test_mrp_repair_cancel.yml',

30
addons/mrp_repair/test/mrp_repair_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'MRP Repair Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_repair_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: MRP Manager
login: marm
password: marm
email: mrp_repair_manager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for MRP Repair Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_repair_manager}:
groups_id:
- mrp.group_mrp_manager
-
Create a user as 'MRP Repair User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_repair_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: MRP User
login: maru
password: maru
email: mrp_repair_user@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for MRP Repair User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_mrp_repair_user}:
groups_id:
- mrp.group_mrp_user

5
addons/mrp_repair/test/test_mrp_repair_afterinv.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
In order to test Invoice Method 'After Repair'.
In order to test Invoice Method 'After Repair' with giving the access rights of mrp user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_mrp_repair_user'
-
I confirm Repair order taking Invoice Method 'After Repair'.
-

5
addons/mrp_repair/test/test_mrp_repair_b4inv.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
Now I test for Invoice Method 'Before Repair'.
Now I test for Invoice Method 'Before Repair' with giving the access rights of mrp user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_mrp_repair_user'
-
I confirm Repair order for Invoice Method 'Before Repair'.
-

5
addons/mrp_repair/test/test_mrp_repair_cancel.yml
View File

@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
-
In order to test the cancel flow of mrp_repair module,
I start by creating new copy Repair order for "PC Assemble SC234" product.
I start by creating new copy Repair order for "PC Assemble SC234" product with giving access rights of mrp user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_mrp_repair_user'
-
!python {model: mrp.repair}: |
copy_id = self.copy(cr, uid, ref("mrp_repair_rmrp1"))

5
addons/mrp_repair/test/test_mrp_repair_noneinv.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
In order to test "mrp_repair" module, I start with confirm state, and start repair.
In order to test "mrp_repair" module, I start with confirm state, and start repair with giving the access rights of mrp user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_mrp_repair_user'
-
I confirm Repair order for Invoice Method 'No Invoice'.
-

1
addons/project/security/project_security.xml
View File

@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
<record id="group_project_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">User</field>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_project_management"/>
</record>

1
addons/project_issue/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ It allows the manager to quickly check the issues, assign them and decide on the
],
'demo': ['project_issue_demo.xml'],
'test': [
'test/issue_users.yml',
'test/subscribe_issue.yml',
'test/issue_process.yml',
'test/issue_demo.yml'

6
addons/project_issue/test/issue_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Test the whole create project issue with project manager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_project_issue_manager'
-
!record {model: project.issue, id: project_task_1, view: False}:
task_id: 'project.project_task_17'
@ -6,3 +11,4 @@
!record {model: project.issue, id: project01, view: False}:
project_id: 'project.project_project_2'
name: 'OpenERP Integration'

5
addons/project_issue/test/issue_process.yml
View File

@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
self.send_mail(cr, uid, [new_id], context=ctx)
except Exception, e:
pass
-
Only project manager can create Task for Issue, so let's check data with giving the access rights of manager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_project_issue_manager'
-
I create Task for Issue.
-

30
addons/project_issue/test/issue_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Project manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_project_issue_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Project Manager
login: prim
password: prim
email: issuemanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Project manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_project_issue_manager}:
groups_id:
- project.group_project_manager
-
Create a user as 'Project user'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_project_issue_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Project User
login: priu
password: priu
email: issueuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Project user.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_project_issue_user}:
groups_id:
- project.group_project_user

2
addons/project_issue/test/subscribe_issue.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-
In Order to test process of Issue in OpenERP, Custmer send the issue by email.
In Order to test process of Issue in OpenERP, Customer send the issue by email.
-
!python {model: mail.thread}: |
request_file = open(openerp.modules.module.get_module_resource('project_issue','test', 'issue.eml'),'rb')

1
addons/purchase/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Dashboard / Reports for Purchase Management will include:
'res_config_view.xml',
],
'test': [
'test/ui/purchase_users.yml',
'test/process/cancel_order.yml',
'test/process/rfq2order2done.yml',
'test/process/generate_invoice_from_reception.yml',

2
addons/purchase/purchase_order_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
-
Give access rights of Purchase user to create purchase order
-
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_1}:
partner_id: base.res_partner_1

5
addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Purchase user can also cancel order therfore test with that user which have Purchase user rights.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_user'
-
In order to test the cancel flow, I start it from canceling confirmed purchase order.
-

5
addons/purchase/test/process/generate_invoice_from_reception.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Purchase user can create an invoice for order on receptions therfore test with that user which have Purchase user rights.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_user'
-
I confirm another order where invoice control is 'Bases on incoming shipments'.
-

13
addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Purchase User confirm the order and create invoice based on purchase order line.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_user'
-
I confirm purchase order which has invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
-
@ -17,10 +22,4 @@
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_order_6"))
for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
-
I set the default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
-
!python {model: purchase.config.settings}: |
new_id = self.create(cr, uid, {'default_invoice_method': 'manual'})
self.execute(cr, uid, [new_id])
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."

5
addons/purchase/test/process/merge_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give access rights of Purchase user to merge two RFQ.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_user'
-
In order to merge RFQ, I merge two RFQ which has same supplier and check new merged order.
-

5
addons/purchase/test/ui/delete_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give access rights of Purchase user to delete purchase order
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_user'
-
In order to test to delete process on purchase order.
-

30
addons/purchase/test/ui/purchase_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Purchase manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Purchase Manager
login: pm
password: pm
email: purchasemanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Purchase manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_manager}:
groups_id:
- purchase.group_purchase_manager
-
Create a user as 'Purchase user'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Purchase User
login: pu
password: pu
email: purchaseuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Purchase user.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_user}:
groups_id:
- purchase.group_purchase_user

1
addons/purchase_requisition/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ keep track and order all your purchase orders.
],
'auto_install': False,
'test': [
'test/purchase_requisition_users.yml',
'test/purchase_requisition_demo.yml',
'test/purchase_requisition.yml',
'test/cancel_purchase_requisition.yml',

1
addons/purchase_requisition/security/purchase_tender.xml
View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
<record id="group_purchase_requisition_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">User</field>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('purchase.group_purchase_user'))]"/>
<field name="category_id" ref="module_category_purchase_requisition"/>
</record>

5
addons/purchase_requisition/test/cancel_purchase_requisition.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give access rights of Purchase Requisition User to cancelled requisition
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_requisition_user'
-
I cancel requisition.
-

5
addons/purchase_requisition/test/purchase_requisition.yml
View File

@ -30,6 +30,11 @@
assert line.product_id.id == procurement.product_id.id, "Product is not correspond."
assert line.product_uom_id.id == procurement.product_uom.id, "UOM is not correspond."
assert line.product_qty == procurement.product_qty, "Quantity is not correspond."
-
Give access rights of Purchase Requisition User to open requisition
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_requisition_user'
-
I open another requisition.
-

5
addons/purchase_requisition/test/purchase_requisition_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Give access rights of Purchase Requisition User to create requisition
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_purchase_requisition_user'
-
In order to test process of the purchase requisition ,I create requisition
-

30
addons/purchase_requisition/test/purchase_requisition_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Purchase Requisition Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_requisition_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Purchase requisition Manager
login: prm
password: prm
email: requisition_manager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Purchase Requisition Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_requisition_manager}:
groups_id:
- purchase_requisition.group_purchase_requisition_manager
-
Create a user as 'Purchase Requisition User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_requisition_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Purchase requisition User
login: pru
password: pru
email: requisition_user@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Purchase Requisition User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_purchase_requisition_user}:
groups_id:
- purchase_requisition.group_purchase_requisition_user

1
addons/resource/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ associated to every resource. It also manages the leaves of every resource.
'depends': ['process'],
'data': [
'security/ir.model.access.csv',
'security/resource_security.xml',
'resource_view.xml',
],
'demo': ['resource_demo.xml'],

1
addons/resource/security/ir.model.access.csv
View File

@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ access_resource_calendar,resource.calendar,model_resource_calendar,base.group_sy
access_resource_calendar_attendance,resource.calendar.attendance,model_resource_calendar_attendance,base.group_system,1,1,1,1
access_resource_resource,resource.resource,model_resource_resource,base.group_system,1,0,0,0
access_resource_resource_all,resource.resource all,model_resource_resource,,1,0,0,0
access_resource_calendar_leaves_user,resource.calendar.leaves,model_resource_calendar_leaves,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
access_resource_calendar_leaves,resource.calendar.leaves,model_resource_calendar_leaves,base.group_system,1,1,1,1

1 id name model_id:id group_id:id perm_read perm_write perm_create perm_unlink
3 access_resource_calendar_attendance resource.calendar.attendance model_resource_calendar_attendance base.group_system 1 1 1 1
4 access_resource_resource resource.resource model_resource_resource base.group_system 1 0 0 0
5 access_resource_resource_all resource.resource all model_resource_resource 1 0 0 0
6 access_resource_calendar_leaves_user resource.calendar.leaves model_resource_calendar_leaves base.group_user 1 0 0 0
7 access_resource_calendar_leaves resource.calendar.leaves model_resource_calendar_leaves base.group_system 1 1 1 1

16
addons/resource/security/resource_security.xml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<openerp>
<data noupdate="1">
<record model="ir.rule" id="resource_own_leaves">
<field name="name">Resource: see own leaves</field>
<field name="model_id" ref="model_resource_calendar_leaves"/>
<field name="groups" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
<field name="domain_force">['|',
('resource_id', '=', False),
('resource_id.user_id', '=', user.id),
]</field>
</record>
</data>
</openerp>

1
addons/sale/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ The Dashboard for the Sales Manager will include
],
'demo': ['sale_demo.xml'],
'test': [
'test/create_sale_users.yml',
'test/sale_order_demo.yml',
'test/manual_order_policy.yml',
'test/cancel_order.yml',

5
addons/sale/test/cancel_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Salesman can also cancel order therefore test with that user which have salesman rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_salesman'
-
In order to test the cancel sale order.
I confirm order (with at least 2 lines)

30
addons/sale/test/create_sale_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Salesmanager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_salesmanager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Sales manager
login: sm
password: sm
email: salesmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Salesmanager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_salesmanager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_manager
-
Create a user as 'Salesman'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_salesman}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Salesman
login: su
password: su
email: salesman@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Salesman.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_salesman}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_salesman_all_leads

5
addons/sale/test/delete_order.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Sales manager can only delete order therefore test with that user which have sales manager rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_salesmanager'
-
I try to delete In progress order and check Error Message.
-

5
addons/sale/test/sale_order_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Test the data with salesman,
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_salesman'
-
In order to test process of the Sale Order, I create sale order
-

3
addons/sale_stock/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ You can choose flexible invoicing methods:
'process/sale_stock_process.xml',
],
'demo': ['sale_stock_demo.xml'],
'test': ['test/cancel_order_sale_stock.yml',
'test': ['test/sale_stock_users.yml',
'test/cancel_order_sale_stock.yml',
'test/picking_order_policy.yml',
'test/prepaid_order_policy.yml',
'test/sale_order_onchange.yml',

18
addons/sale_stock/test/cancel_order_sale_stock.yml
View File

@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
-
In order to test the cancel sale order.
In order to test the cancel sale order with that user which have salesman rights.
First I confirm order.
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: sale.sale_order_8}
-
I send delivery in two shipments, so I am doing a partial delivery order.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
context={}
delivery_orders = self.search(cr, uid, [('sale_id','=',ref("sale.sale_order_8"))])
first_picking = self.browse(cr, uid, delivery_orders[-1], context=context)
if first_picking.force_assign(cr, uid, first_picking):
@ -20,12 +24,22 @@
delivery_orders = self.search(cr, uid, [('sale_id','=',ref("sale.sale_order_8"))])
last_delivery_order_id = delivery_orders[-1]
self.pool.get('stock.picking').signal_button_cancel(cr, uid, [last_delivery_order_id])
-
Only Stock User can change data related warehouse therefore test with that user which have stcok user rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_stock_user'
-
I run the scheduler.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
self.run_scheduler(cr, uid)
-
Salesman can also check order therefore test with that user which have salesman rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
I check order status in "Ship Exception".
-
@ -65,4 +79,4 @@
I check state of order in 'In Progress'.
-
!assert {model: sale.order, id: sale.sale_order_8, string: Sale order should be In progress state}:
- state == 'progress'
- state == 'progress'

25
addons/sale_stock/test/picking_order_policy.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
In order to test process of the Sale Order,
In order to test process of the Sale Order with access rights of saleman,
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
First I check the total amount of the Quotation before Approved.
-
@ -40,11 +43,21 @@
assert procurement.product_qty == order_line.product_uom_qty, "Qty is not correspond."
assert procurement.product_uom.id == order_line.product_uom.id, "UOM is not correspond."
assert procurement.procure_method == order_line.type, "Procurement method is not correspond."
-
Only stock user can change data related warehouse therefore test with that user which have stock user rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_stock_user'
-
I run the scheduler.
-
!python {model: procurement.order}: |
self.run_scheduler(cr, uid)
-
Salesman can also check order therefore test with that user which have salesman rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
I check the details of delivery order after confirmed quotation.
-
@ -136,6 +149,11 @@
assert inv_line.price_unit == so_line.price_unit , "Price Unit is not correspond."
assert inv_line.quantity == (so_line.product_uos and so_line.product_uos_qty) or so_line.product_uom_qty , "Product qty is not correspond."
assert inv_line.price_subtotal == so_line.price_subtotal, "Price sub total is not correspond."
-
Only Stock manager can open the Invoice therefore test with that user which have stock manager rights,
-
!context
uid: 'res_stock_manager'
-
I open the Invoice.
-
@ -157,6 +175,11 @@
journal_ids[0], ref('account.cash'),
ref('account.period_8'), journal_ids[0],
name='test')
-
To test process of the Sale Order with access rights of saleman,
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
I check the order after paid invoice.
-

5
addons/sale_stock/test/prepaid_order_policy.yml
View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
-
Now I confirm the Quotation with "Pay before delivery" policy.
Now I confirm the Quotation with "Pay before delivery" policy with access rights of salesman.
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
!workflow {model: sale.order, action: order_confirm, ref: sale.sale_order_4}
-

10
addons/sale_stock/test/sale_order_onchange.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Only sales manager Creates product so let's check with access rights of salemanager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesmanager'
-
In order to test the onchange of the Sale Order, I create a product
-
@ -5,6 +10,11 @@
name: 'Devil Worship Book'
list_price: 66.6
procure_method: 'make_to_order'
-
In sale order to test process of onchange of Sale Order with access rights of saleman.
-
!context
uid: 'res_sale_stock_salesman'
-
Now i create a sale order that uses my new product
-

61
addons/sale_stock/test/sale_stock_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
-
Create a user as 'Stock Salesmanager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_sale_stock_salesmanager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock Sales manager
login: ssm
password: ssm
email: ss_salesmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Salesmanager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_sale_stock_salesmanager}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_manager
-
Create a user as 'Stock Salesman'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_sale_stock_salesman}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock Salesman
login: ssu
password: ssu
email: ss_salesman@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Stock Salesman.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_sale_stock_salesman}:
groups_id:
- base.group_sale_salesman_all_leads
-
Create a user as 'Stock User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_stock_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock User
login: sau
password: sau
email: stock_user@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Stock User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_stock_user}:
groups_id:
- stock.group_stock_user
-
Create a user as 'Stock Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_stock_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock Manager
login: sam
password: sam
email: admin@portal.example.com
email: stock_manager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Stock Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_stock_manager}:
groups_id:
- stock.group_stock_manager

9
addons/stock/__openerp__.py
View File

@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ Dashboard / Reports for Warehouse Management will include:
'sequence': 16,
'demo': [
'stock_demo.xml',
# 'stock_demo.yml',
],
'data': [
'security/stock_security.xml',
@ -91,9 +90,11 @@ Dashboard / Reports for Warehouse Management will include:
'res_config_view.xml',
],
'test': [
# 'test/opening_stock.yml',
# 'test/shipment.yml',
# 'test/stock_report.yml',
'test/stock_users.yml',
'stock_demo.yml',
'test/opening_stock.yml',
'test/shipment.yml',
'test/stock_report.yml',
],
'installable': True,
'application': True,

2
addons/stock/security/stock_security.xml
View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
<record id="group_stock_manager" model="res.groups">
<field name="name">Manager</field>
<field name="category_id" ref="base.module_category_warehouse_management"/>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('group_stock_user'))]"/>
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('group_stock_user')), (4, ref('account.group_account_user'))]"/>
<field name="users" eval="[(4, ref('base.user_root'))]"/>
</record>

128
addons/stock/stock_demo.yml
View File

@ -1,99 +1,107 @@
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_refrigerator}:
name: Refrigerator
Only stock manager can create location,warehouse and product, so let's check data with giving the access rights of manager
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_manager'
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_monitor}:
name: chicago shop
usage: internal
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_delivery_counter}:
name: Delivery Counter
!record {model: stock.location, id: stock_location_output}:
name: Output
usage: internal
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_refrigerator_small}:
name: Small Refrigerator
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_monitor_small}:
name: Small chicago shop
usage: internal
location_id: location_refrigerator
location_id: location_monitor
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_opening}:
name: opening
usage: inventory
-
!record {model: stock.location, id: location_convenience_shop}:
name: Convenient Store
!record {model: stock.location, id: stock_location_3}:
name: IT Suppliers
usage: supplier
-
!record {model: stock.warehouse, id: warehouse_icecream}:
name: Ice Cream Shop
lot_input_id: location_refrigerator
lot_stock_id: location_refrigerator
lot_output_id: location_delivery_counter
!record {model: stock.warehouse, id: stock_warehouse_shop0}:
name: Chicago Warehouse
lot_input_id: location_monitor
lot_stock_id: location_monitor
lot_output_id: stock_location_output
-
!record {model: product.product, id: product_icecream}:
default_code: 001
name: Ice Cream
type: product
categ_id: product.product_category_1
list_price: 100.0
standard_price: 70.0
uom_id: product.product_uom_kgm
uom_po_id: product.product_uom_kgm
procure_method: make_to_stock
!record {model: product.product, id: product_product_6}:
default_code: LCD15
name: 15” LCD Monitor
type: consu
categ_id: product.product_category_8
list_price: 1200.0
standard_price: 800.0
uom_id: product.product_uom_unit
uom_po_id: product.product_uom_unit
property_stock_inventory: location_opening
valuation: real_time
cost_method: average
property_stock_account_input: account.o_expense
property_stock_account_output: account.o_income
description: Ice cream can be mass-produced and thus is widely available in developed parts of the world. Ice cream can be purchased in large cartons (vats and squrounds) from supermarkets and grocery stores, in smaller quantities from ice cream shops, convenience stores, and milk bars, and in individual servings from small carts or vans at public events.
property_stock_account_input: account.conf_o_income
property_stock_account_output: account.a_expense
-
!record {model: stock.production.lot, id: lot_icecream_0}:
name: Lot0 for Ice cream
product_id: product_icecream
Stock user can handled production lot,inventory and picking, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user
-
!record {model: stock.production.lot, id: lot_icecream_1}:
name: Lot1 for Ice cream
product_id: product_icecream
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_user'
-
!record {model: stock.inventory, id: stock_inventory_icecream}:
name: Inventory for icecream
!record {model: stock.production.lot, id: lot_monitor_0}:
name: Lot0 for LCD Monitor
product_id: product_product_6
-
!record {model: stock.inventory.line, id: stock_inventory_line_icecream_lot0}:
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
inventory_id: stock_inventory_icecream
!record {model: stock.production.lot, id: lot_monitor_1}:
name: Lot1 for LCD Monitor
product_id: product_product_6
-
!record {model: stock.inventory, id: stock_inventory_0}:
name: Starting Inventory
state: draft
-
!record {model: stock.inventory.line, id: stock_inventory_line_3}:
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
inventory_id: stock_inventory_0
product_qty: 50.0
prod_lot_id: lot_icecream_0
location_id: location_refrigerator
prod_lot_id: lot_monitor_0
location_id: location_monitor
-
!record {model: stock.inventory.line, id: stock_inventory_line_icecream_lot1}:
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
inventory_id: stock_inventory_icecream
!record {model: stock.inventory.line, id: stock_inventory_line_monitor}:
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
inventory_id: stock_inventory_0
product_qty: 40.0
prod_lot_id: lot_icecream_1
location_id: location_refrigerator
prod_lot_id: lot_monitor_1
location_id: location_monitor
-
!record {model: stock.picking, id: outgoing_shipment}:
type: out
location_dest_id: location_delivery_counter
location_dest_id: stock_location_output
-
!record {model: stock.move, id: outgoing_shipment_icecream}:
!record {model: stock.move, id: outgoing_shipment_monitor}:
picking_id: outgoing_shipment
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
product_qty: 130.0
location_id: location_refrigerator
location_dest_id: location_delivery_counter
location_id: location_monitor
location_dest_id: stock_location_output
-
!record {model: stock.picking, id: incomming_shipment}:
type: in
invoice_state: 2binvoiced
partner_id: base.res_partner_address_9
location_dest_id: location_refrigerator
location_dest_id: location_monitor
-
!record {model: stock.move, id: incomming_shipment_icecream}:
!record {model: stock.move, id: incomming_shipment_monitor}:
picking_id: incomming_shipment
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
product_qty: 50.0
location_id: location_convenience_shop
location_dest_id: location_refrigerator
location_id: stock_location_3
location_dest_id: location_monitor

92
addons/stock/test/opening_stock.yml
View File

@ -1,67 +1,87 @@
-
I update the price of the Ice-cream.
Only stock manager can change the price and update stock of products, so let's check data with giving the access rights of manager
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_manager'
-
I update the price of the 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!python {model: stock.change.standard.price}: |
context.update({'active_model':'product.product', 'active_id': ref('product_icecream'), 'active_ids':[ref('product_icecream')]})
context.update({'active_model':'product.product', 'active_id': ref('product_product_6'), 'active_ids':[ref('product_product_6')]})
-
!record {model: stock.change.standard.price, id: change_price}:
new_price: 120
new_price: 1500
-
!python {model: stock.change.standard.price}: |
self.change_price(cr, uid, [ref('change_price')], context=context)
-
I check price of Ice-cream after update price.
I check price of 15” LCD Monitor after update price.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
assert product.standard_price == 120, "Price is not updated."
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.standard_price == 1500, "Price is not updated."
-
I update the current stock of the Ice-cream with 10 kgm in Small Refrigerator in lot0.
I update the current stock of the 15” LCD Monitor with 10 unit in stock location shop1 in lot0.
-
!record {model: stock.change.product.qty, id: change_qty}:
location_id: location_refrigerator_small
location_id: location_monitor_small
new_quantity: 10
product_id: product_icecream
prodlot_id: lot_icecream_1
product_id: product_product_6
prodlot_id: lot_monitor_1
-
!python {model: stock.change.product.qty}: |
self.change_product_qty(cr, uid, [ref('change_qty')], context=context)
-
I check available stock of Ice-cream after update stock.
I check available stock of 15” LCD Monitor after update stock.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.qty_available == 10, "Stock is not updated."
-
Stock user can merge inventory, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_user'
-
I merge inventory.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory.merge }: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_icecream'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')]})
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_0'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_0')]})
-
!record {model: stock.inventory.merge, id: merge_inventory}:
-
!python {model: stock.inventory.merge }: |
self.do_merge(cr, uid, [ref('merge_inventory')], context=context)
-
Only stock manager cancelled inventory, so let's check data with giving the access rights of manager
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_manager'
-
I cancel inventory.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
self.action_cancel_inventory(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')])
self.action_cancel_inventory(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_0')])
-
stock user can reset inventory, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_user'
-
I reset to draft inventory.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
self.action_cancel_draft(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')])
self.action_cancel_draft(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_0')])
-
I confirm physical inventory of Ice-cream which are came in different lots.
I confirm physical inventory of 15” LCD Monitor which are came in different lots.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
self.action_confirm(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')], context=context)
self.action_confirm(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_0')], context=context)
-
I check move details after confirmed physical inventory.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
inventory = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_inventory_icecream'), context=context)
inventory = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_inventory_0'), context=context)
assert len(inventory.move_ids) == len(inventory.inventory_line_id), "moves are not correspond."
for move_line in inventory.move_ids:
for line in inventory.inventory_line_id:
@ -77,15 +97,15 @@
I split inventory line.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory.line.split}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory.line', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_line_icecream_lot0'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_line_icecream_lot0')]})
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory.line', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_line_3'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_line_3')]})
-
!record {model: stock.inventory.line.split, id: split_inventory_lot0}:
use_exist: True
line_exist_ids:
- quantity: 6
prodlot_id: lot_icecream_0
prodlot_id: lot_monitor_0
- quantity: 4
prodlot_id: lot_icecream_0
prodlot_id: lot_monitor_0
-
!python {model: stock.inventory.line.split }: |
self.split_lot(cr, uid, [ref('split_inventory_lot0')], context=context)
@ -93,39 +113,49 @@
I fill inventory line.
-
!python {model: stock.fill.inventory}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_icecream'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')]})
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.inventory', 'active_id': ref('stock_inventory_0'), 'active_ids': [ref('stock_inventory_0')]})
-
!record {model: stock.fill.inventory, id: fill_inventory}:
location_id: location_refrigerator
location_id: location_monitor
recursive: True
-
!python {model: stock.fill.inventory }: |
self.fill_inventory(cr, uid, [ref('fill_inventory')], context=context)
-
Now I check vitual stock of Ice-cream after confirmed physical inventory.
Now I check vitual stock of 15” LCD Monitor after confirmed physical inventory.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.virtual_available == 100, "Vitual stock is not updated."
-
I close physical inventory of Ice-cream.
Only stock manager can close physical inventory, so let's check data with giving the access rights of manager
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_manager'
-
I close physical inventory of 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
self.action_done(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')], context=context)
self.action_done(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_0')], context=context)
-
I check closed move and real stock of Ice-cream after closed physical inventory.
Stock user can check closed move and real stock, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_user'
-
I check closed move and real stock of 15” LCD Monitor after closed physical inventory.
-
!python {model: stock.inventory}: |
inventory = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_inventory_icecream'), context=context)
inventory = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_inventory_0'), context=context)
assert inventory.state == 'done', "inventory is not closed."
for move_line in inventory.move_ids:
assert move_line.state == 'done', "Move is not closed."
product = self.pool.get('product.product').browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
product = self.pool.get('product.product').browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
product.qty_available == 100, "Real stock is not updated."
-
I check stock in lot.
-
!python {model: stock.production.lot}: |
lot = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('lot_icecream_0'), context=context)
lot = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('lot_monitor_0'), context=context)
assert lot.stock_available == 50, "Stock in lot is not correspond."

356
addons/stock/test/shipment.yml
View File

@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
-
I confirm outgoing shipment of 130 kgm Ice-cream.
Stock manager can only test whole process related to Shipment, so let's check data with stock manager.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_manager'
-
I confirm outgoing shipment of 130 Unit 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!workflow {model: stock.picking, action: button_confirm, ref: outgoing_shipment}
-
I check shipment details after confirmed.
I check shipment details after confirmation.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("outgoing_shipment"))
@ -12,121 +17,25 @@
assert move_line.state == "confirmed", "Move should be confirmed."
-
Now I check vitual stock of Ice-cream after confirmed outgoing shipment.
Now, I check virtual stock of 15” LCD Monitor after confirming outgoing shipment.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
product.virtual_available == -30, "Vitual stock is not updated."
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.virtual_available == -30, "Virtual stock is not updated."
-
I confirm incomming shipment of 50 kgm Ice-cream.
I confirm incoming shipment of 50 Unit 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!workflow {model: stock.picking, action: button_confirm, ref: incomming_shipment}
-
I receive 40kgm Ice-cream so I make backorder of incomming shipment for 40 kgm.
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.picking', 'active_id': ref('incomming_shipment'), 'active_ids': [ref('incomming_shipment')]})
-
!record {model: stock.partial.picking, id: partial_incomming}:
move_ids:
- quantity: 40
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
move_id: incomming_shipment_icecream
location_id: location_convenience_shop
location_dest_id: location_refrigerator
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking }: |
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_incomming')], context=context)
-
I check backorder shipment after received partial shipment.
I split incoming shipment into lots. each lot contain 10 Unit 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
backorder = shipment.backorder_id
assert backorder, "Backorder should be created after partial shipment."
assert backorder.state == 'done', "Backorder should be close after received."
for move_line in backorder.move_lines:
assert move_line.product_qty == 40, "Qty in backorder does not correspond."
assert move_line.state == 'done', "Move line of backorder should be closed."
-
I receive another 10kgm Ice-cream.
-
!record {model: stock.partial.picking, id: partial_incomming}:
move_ids:
- quantity: 10
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
move_id: incomming_shipment_icecream
location_id: location_convenience_shop
location_dest_id: location_refrigerator
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking }: |
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_incomming')], context=context)
-
I check incomming shipment after received.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
assert shipment.state == 'done', "shipment should be close after received."
for move_line in shipment.move_lines:
assert move_line.product_qty == 10, "Qty does not correspond."
assert move_line.product_id.virtual_available == 20, "Virtual stock does not correspond."
assert move_line.state == 'done', "Move line should be closed."
-
I return last incomming shipment for 10 kgm Ice-cream.
-
!record {model: stock.return.picking, id: return_incomming}:
invoice_state: none
-
!python {model: stock.return.picking }: |
# this work without giving the id of the picking to return, magically, thanks to the context
self.create_returns(cr, uid, [ref('return_incomming')], context=context)
-
I cancel incomming shipment after return it.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
# the cancel is not on the return, but on the incomming shipment (which now has a quantity of 10, thanks to the
# backorder). This situation is a little weird as we returned a move that we finally cancelled... As result, only
# 30Kg from the original 50Kg will be counted in the stock (50 - 10 (cancelled quantity) - 10 (returned quantity))
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("incomming_shipment")], context=context)
-
I make invoice of backorder of incomming shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.invoice.onshipping}: |
shipment = self.pool.get('stock.picking').browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.picking', 'active_id': shipment.backorder_id.id, 'active_ids': [shipment.backorder_id.id]})
-
!record {model: stock.invoice.onshipping, id: invoice_incomming}:
group: False
-
!python {model: stock.invoice.onshipping }: |
self.create_invoice(cr, uid, [ref('invoice_incomming')], context=context)
-
I check invoice state of backorder of incomming shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
assert shipment.backorder_id.invoice_state == 'invoiced', 'Invoice state is not upadted.'
-
I check available stock after received incomming shipping.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
assert product.qty_available == 140, "Stock does not correspond."
assert product.virtual_available == 0, "Vitual stock does not correspond."
-
I split incomming shipment into lots. each lot contain 10 kgm Ice-cream.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
move_ids = [x.id for x in shipment.backorder_id.move_lines]
move_ids = [x.id for x in shipment.move_lines]
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.move', 'active_id': move_ids[0], 'active_ids': move_ids})
-
!record {model: stock.move.split, id: split_lot_incomming}:
!record {model: stock.move.split, id: split_lot_incoming}:
line_ids:
- name: incoming_lot0
quantity: 10
@ -136,23 +45,123 @@
quantity: 10
- name: incoming_lot3
quantity: 10
-
!python {model: stock.move.split }: |
self.split_lot(cr, uid, [ref('split_lot_incomming')], context=context)
self.split_lot(cr, uid, [ref('split_lot_incoming')], context=context)
-
I check move lines after spliting
I check move lines after splitting.
-
!python {model: stock.move}: |
lot = self.pool.get('stock.move.split').browse(cr, uid, ref('split_lot_incomming'), context=context)
mm = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment_monitor"))
lot = self.pool.get('stock.move.split').browse(cr, uid, ref('split_lot_incoming'), context=context)
lot_ids = self.pool.get('stock.production.lot').search(cr, uid, [('name','in',[x.name for x in lot.line_ids])])
assert len(lot_ids) == 4, 'lots of incomming shipment are not correspond.'
move_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('location_dest_id','=',ref('location_refrigerator')),('prodlot_id','in',lot_ids)])
assert len(move_ids) == 4, 'move lines are not correspond per prodcution lot after splited.'
assert len(lot_ids) == 4, 'lots of incoming shipment are not correspond.'
move_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('location_dest_id','=',ref('location_monitor')),('prodlot_id','in',lot_ids)])
assert len(move_ids) == 4, 'move lines are not correspond per production lot after splitting.'
for move in self.browse(cr, uid, move_ids, context=context):
assert move.prodlot_id.name in ['incoming_lot0', 'incoming_lot1', 'incoming_lot2', 'incoming_lot3'], "lot does not correspond."
assert move.product_qty == 10, "qty does not correspond per production lot."
context.update({'active_model':'stock.move', 'active_id':move_ids[0],'active_ids': move_ids})
-
I receive 40 units of 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.picking', 'active_id': ref('incomming_shipment'), 'active_ids': [ref('incomming_shipment')]})
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking}: |
partial = []
for move in self.pool.get('stock.picking').browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment")).move_lines:
if move.prodlot_id:
partial.append((0, 0, {
'quantity': move.product_qty,
'product_id': move.product_id.id,
'product_uom': move.product_uom.id,
'move_id': move.id,
'location_id': move.location_id.id,
'location_dest_id': move.location_dest_id.id,
'prodlot_id': move.prodlot_id.id,
'cost': move.product_id.standard_price
}))
partial_id = self.create(cr, uid, {'move_ids': partial}, context=context)
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [partial_id], context=context)
-
I check backorder shipment after receiving partial shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
backorder = shipment.backorder_id
assert backorder, "Backorder should be created after partial shipment."
assert backorder.state == 'done', "Backorder should be closed after received."
qty = 0
for move_line in backorder.move_lines:
assert move_line.state == 'done', "Move line of backorder should be closed."
qty += move_line.product_qty
assert qty == 40, "Qty in backorder does not correspond."
-
I receive another 10 units of 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!record {model: stock.partial.picking, id: partial_incoming}:
move_ids:
- quantity: 10
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
move_id: incomming_shipment_monitor
location_id: stock_location_3
location_dest_id: location_monitor
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking }: |
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_incoming')], context=context)
-
I check incoming shipment after receiving it.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
assert shipment.state == 'done', "shipment should be closed after receiving."
for move_line in shipment.move_lines:
assert move_line.product_qty == 10, "Qty does not correspond."
assert move_line.product_id.virtual_available == 20, "Virtual stock does not correspond."
assert move_line.state == 'done', "Move line should be closed."
-
I return last incoming shipment for 10 Unit 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!record {model: stock.return.picking, id: return_incoming}:
invoice_state: none
-
!python {model: stock.return.picking }: |
# this work without giving the id of the picking to return, magically, thanks to the context
self.create_returns(cr, uid, [ref('return_incoming')], context=context)
-
I cancel incoming shipment after returning it.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
# the cancel is not on the return, but on the incoming shipment (which now has a quantity of 10, thanks to the
# backorder). This situation is a little weird as we returned a move that we finally cancelled... As result, only
# 30Unit from the original 50Unit will be counted in the stock (50 - 10 (cancelled quantity) - 10 (returned quantity))
self.action_cancel(cr, uid, [ref("incomming_shipment")], context=context)
-
I make invoice of backorder of incoming shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.invoice.onshipping}: |
shipment = self.pool.get('stock.picking').browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.picking', 'active_id': shipment.backorder_id.id, 'active_ids': [shipment.backorder_id.id]})
-
!record {model: stock.invoice.onshipping, id: invoice_incoming}:
group: False
-
!python {model: stock.invoice.onshipping }: |
self.create_invoice(cr, uid, [ref('invoice_incoming')], context=context)
-
I check invoice status of backorder of incoming shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("incomming_shipment"))
assert shipment.backorder_id.invoice_state == 'invoiced', 'Invoice state is not updated.'
-
I check available stock after receiving incoming shipping.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.qty_available == 140, "Stock does not correspond."
assert product.virtual_available == 0, "Virtual stock does not correspond."
-
I check the stock valuation account entries.
-
@ -161,91 +170,90 @@
account_move_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('ref','=',incomming_shipment.name)])
assert len(account_move_ids), "account move should be created."
account_move = self.browse(cr, uid, account_move_ids[0], context=context)
assert len(account_move.line_id) == len(incomming_shipment.move_lines) + 1, 'accuont entries are not correspond.'
assert len(account_move.line_id) == len(incomming_shipment.move_lines) + 1, 'Accounting entries does not correspond.'
for account_move_line in account_move.line_id:
for stock_move in incomming_shipment.move_lines:
if account_move_line.account_id.id == stock_move.product_id.property_stock_account_input.id:
assert account_move_line.credit == 800.0, "Credit amount does not correspond."
assert account_move_line.credit == 14000.0, "Credit amount does not correspond."
assert account_move_line.debit == 0.0, "Debit amount does not correspond."
else:
assert account_move_line.credit == 0.0, "Credit amount does not correspond."
assert account_move_line.debit == 800.0, "Debit amount does not correspond."
-
I consume 1 kgm ice-cream from each incoming lots into internal production.
-
!record {model: stock.move.consume, id: consume_lot_incomming}:
product_qty: 1
location_id: location_refrigerator
-
!python {model: stock.move.consume}: |
self.do_move_consume(cr, uid, [ref('consume_lot_incomming')], context=context)
-
I scrap 10 gm ice-cream from each incoming lots into scrap location.
-
!record {model: stock.move.scrap, id: scrap_lot_incomming}:
product_qty: 0.010
-
!python {model: stock.move.scrap}: |
self.move_scrap(cr, uid, [ref('scrap_lot_incomming')], context=context)
-
I check stock in scrap location and refrigerator location.
-
!python {model: stock.location}: |
ctx = {'product_id': ref('product_icecream')}
refrigerator_location = self.pool.get('stock.location').browse(cr, uid, ref('location_refrigerator'), context=ctx)
assert refrigerator_location.stock_real == 135.96, 'stock does not correspond in refrigerator location.'
scrapped_location = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_location_scrapped'), context=ctx)
assert scrapped_location.stock_real == 0.010*4, 'scraped stock does not correspond in scrap location.'
-
I check availabile stock after consumed and scraped.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
assert product.qty_available == 135.96, "Stock does not correspond."
assert round(product.virtual_available, 2) == -4.04, "Vitual stock does not correspond."
assert account_move_line.debit == 14000.0, "Debit amount does not correspond."
-
I trace all incoming lots.
-
!python {model: stock.production.lot }: |
lot = self.pool.get('stock.move.split').browse(cr, uid, ref('split_lot_incomming'), context=context)
lot = self.pool.get('stock.move.split').browse(cr, uid, ref('split_lot_incoming'), context=context)
lot_ids = self.search(cr, uid, [('name', 'in', [x.name for x in lot.line_ids])])
self.action_traceability(cr, uid, lot_ids, context=context)
-
I check outgoing shipment after stock availablity in refrigerator.
I check outgoing shipment after stock availability in Chicago shop.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("outgoing_shipment"), context=context)
self.pool.get('stock.move').action_assign(cr, uid, [x.id for x in shipment.move_lines]) #TOFIX: assignment of move lines should be call before testing assigment otherwise picking never gone in assign state
#TOFIX: shipment should be assigned if stock available
#assert shipment.state == "assigned", "Shipment should be assigned."
#for move_line in shipment.move_lines:
# assert move_line.state == "assigned", "Move should be assigned."
self.pool.get('stock.move').action_assign(cr, uid, [x.id for x in shipment.move_lines])
assert shipment.state == "assigned", "Shipment should be assigned."
for move_line in shipment.move_lines:
assert move_line.state == "assigned", "Move should be assigned."
self.force_assign(cr, uid, [shipment.id])
context.update({'active_model':'stock.move', 'active_id':shipment.move_lines[0].id,'active_ids': [shipment.move_lines[0].id]})
-
I deliver 5kgm Ice-cream to customer so I make partial deliver
I scrap 4 units of 15” LCD Monitor into scrap location.
-
!record {model: stock.move.scrap, id: scrap_monitor1}:
product_qty: 4
-
!python {model: stock.move.scrap}: |
self.move_scrap(cr, uid, [ref('scrap_monitor1')], context=context)
-
I consume 4 units of 15” LCD Monitor.
-
!record {model: stock.move.consume, id: consume_monitor1}:
product_qty: 4
location_id: location_monitor
-
!python {model: stock.move.consume}: |
self.do_move_consume(cr, uid, [ref('consume_monitor1')], context=context)
-
I check stock in scrap location and stock location.
-
!python {model: stock.location}: |
ctx = {'product_id': ref('product_product_6')}
monitor_location = self.pool.get('stock.location').browse(cr, uid, ref('location_monitor'), context=ctx)
assert monitor_location.stock_real == 132.0, 'stock does not correspond in stock location shop0.'
scrapped_location = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('stock_location_scrapped'), context=ctx)
assert scrapped_location.stock_real == 4, 'scraped stock does not correspond in scrap location.'
-
I check available stock after consumed and scraped move.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert product.qty_available == 132.0, "Stock does not correspond."
assert round(product.virtual_available, 2) == -4.00, "Virtual stock does not correspond."
-
I deliver 5 Unit 15” LCD Monitor to customer partially.
-
!python {model: stock.partial.move}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.move', 'active_id': ref('outgoing_shipment_icecream'), 'active_ids': [ref('outgoing_shipment_icecream')]})
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.move', 'active_id': ref('outgoing_shipment_monitor'), 'active_ids': [ref('outgoing_shipment_monitor')]})
-
!record {model: stock.partial.move, id: partial_outgoing_icecream}:
!record {model: stock.partial.move, id: partial_outgoing_monitor}:
move_ids:
- quantity: 5
product_id: product_icecream
product_uom: product.product_uom_kgm
move_id: outgoing_shipment_icecream
location_id: location_refrigerator
location_dest_id: location_delivery_counter
product_id: product_product_6
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
move_id: outgoing_shipment_monitor
location_id: location_monitor
location_dest_id: stock_location_output
-
!python {model: stock.partial.move }: |
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_outgoing_icecream')], context=context)
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_outgoing_monitor')], context=context)
-
I packing outgoing shipment into box per 10kgm with unique tracking lot.
I pack outgoing shipment into box of 10 Unit with unique tracking lot.
-
!python {model: stock.move}: |
stock_split = self.pool.get('stock.split.into')
move = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('outgoing_shipment_icecream'), context=context)
move = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('outgoing_shipment_monitor'), context=context)
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.move', 'active_id': move.id, 'active_ids': [move.id]})
total_qty = move.product_qty
split_qty = 10
@ -254,7 +262,7 @@
stock_split.split(cr, uid, [split_id], context=context)
total_qty -= split_qty
-
I deliver outgoing shipment.
I deliver the outgoing shipment.
-
!python {model: stock.partial.picking}: |
context.update({'active_model': 'stock.picking', 'active_id': ref('outgoing_shipment'), 'active_ids': [ref('outgoing_shipment')]})
@ -266,7 +274,7 @@
self.do_partial(cr, uid, [ref('partial_outgoing')], context=context)
-
I check outgoing shipment after deliver.
I check outgoing shipment after delivery.
-
!python {model: stock.picking}: |
shipment = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("outgoing_shipment"), context=context)
@ -274,9 +282,9 @@
for move_line in shipment.move_lines:
assert move_line.state == "done", "Move should be closed."
-
I check availaible stock after deliver.
I check available stock after delivery.
-
!python {model: product.product}: |
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_icecream'), context=context)
assert round(product.qty_available, 2) == 5.96, "Stock does not correspond."
assert round(product.virtual_available, 2) == -4.04, "Vitual stock does not correspond."
product = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('product_product_6'), context=context)
assert round(product.qty_available, 2) == 6, "Stock does not correspond."
assert round(product.virtual_available, 2) == -4.00, "Virtual stock does not correspond."

13
addons/stock/test/stock_report.yml
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
-
Stock user can print all reports related to stock, so let's check data with giving the access rights of user.
-
!context
uid: 'res_users_stock_user'
-
I print a stock overview report of location.
-
@ -5,7 +10,7 @@
import os
import openerp.report
from openerp import tools
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('location_refrigerator')], 'lot.stock.overview', {}, {})
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('location_monitor')], 'lot.stock.overview', {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'stock-overview'+format), 'wb+').write(data)
-
@ -15,7 +20,7 @@
import os
import openerp.report
from openerp import tools
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('location_refrigerator')], 'lot.stock.overview_all', {}, {})
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('location_monitor')], 'lot.stock.overview_all', {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'stock-overviewall'+format), 'wb+').write(data)
-
@ -25,7 +30,7 @@
import os
import openerp.report
from openerp import tools
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_icecream')], 'stock.inventory.move', {}, {})
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('stock_inventory_0')], 'stock.inventory.move', {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'stock-stock_inventory_move.'+format), 'wb+').write(data)
-
@ -45,7 +50,7 @@
import os
import openerp.report
from openerp import tools
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('product_icecream')], 'stock.product.history', {}, {})
data, format = openerp.report.render_report(cr, uid, [ref('product_product_6')], 'stock.product.history', {}, {})
if tools.config['test_report_directory']:
file(os.path.join(tools.config['test_report_directory'], 'stock-product_stock_report.'+format), 'wb+').write(data)

30
addons/stock/test/stock_users.yml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
-
Create a user as 'Stock Manager'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_stock_manager}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock Manager
login: sam
password: sam
email: stockmanager@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Stock Manager.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_stock_manager}:
groups_id:
- stock.group_stock_manager
-
Create a user as 'Stock User'
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_stock_user}:
company_id: base.main_company
name: Stock User
login: sau
password: sau
email: stockuser@yourcompany.com
-
I added groups for Stock User.
-
!record {model: res.users, id: res_users_stock_user}:
groups_id:
- stock.group_stock_user