In some cases (e.g. with record rules), the name_get might not have access
to the parent name. Therefore a parent_name related field solves the
issue (as it read with as superuser).
Compute methods could give results that should not be considered as default
values. For instance, a related field usually defaults to a null value, which
is then set to the field with its inverse method by create(). This may violate
a non-null constraint if the original field is required. Therefore, compute
methods are no longer used to determine default values.
Rev f2cf6ced1 modified RFC2822 parsing in order to better support
unicode characters inside the Name part of an address header.
However the patch broke handling of multiple addresses (comma
separated) - silently discarding all recipients except the
first one, as soon as any non-ASCII character was present.
This patch restores the functionality while preserving the
fix from f2cf6ced1, and simplifies the code using email.utils
utility functions.
Fixes (again) lp:1272610, OPW 607683
This solves a subtle issue: in the following case, the class Bar should
override the default value set by Foo. But in practice it was not working,
because _defaults is looked up before field.default.
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'foo': fields.char('Foo'),
}
_defaults = {
'foo': "Foo",
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
foo = fields.Char(default="Bar")
The change makes field.default and the model's _defaults consistent with each
other.
also fix the corresponding text and add explicit sequence number because I
don't understand what the bloody hell it does without that, except that it's
not the right thing. At all.
Consider the following example:
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'state': fields.selection([('a', 'A')]),
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
state = fields.Selection(selection_add=[('b', 'B')])
The attribute 'column' of the field does not have the full selection list,
therefore the column object cannot not be reused, even a copy of it. The
solution is to systematically recreate the column from the field's final
specification, except for function fields that have no sensible way for being
recreated.
* fix mapping handling to match JS impl: current value set as _value instead
of being lost
* add handling of integer parameter
* only set _size and _last if current iterable is sized
Changed render_att_att to return an iterable of pairs instead of a pair, and
dispatched t-att on whether its result is a Mapping.
Also changed qweb test runner so it uses ordereddict for JSON mapping in
params, otherwise iteration order (and thus order of attributes in output) is
unpredictable and results don't/can't match expectations (as both are
strings).
Note that this relies on JS implementation details wrt iteration order of
mappings. Tests would probably be somewhat less brittle if rendering output
was parsed to XML... if that's possible (?)
* document qweb based (mostly) on JS version
* convert JS qweb tests to (mostly) language-independent XML so they can be
used for JS and Python implementations
* add some more tests (e.g. precedence between t-value and body in t-set)
* remove ``t-import``
* fix parity in foreach(dict) (and rename some variables to make array and
object versions more similar)
A security has been introduce in eb9113c04d to restrict access to orphan attachments to employees only
Assets need to be build and accessed as superuser, thus
This reverts commit d4972ffdb6.
Seems to break some cases, at least in _product_reserve from stock/stock.py
Actual use case:
SELECT product_uom, sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_dest_id=%s AND location_id<>%s AND product_id=3645 AND state='done' GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | 6
SELECT product_uom,-sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_id=%s AND location_dest_id<>%s AND product_id=%s AND state in ('done', 'assigned') GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | -6
results += cr.dictfetchall()
total = 0.0
results2 = 0.0
for r in results:
amount = uom_obj._compute_qty(cr, uid, r['product_uom'], r['product_qty'], context.get('uom', False))
results2 += amount
total += amount
Total = 1, amount = -5
It should actually be
Total = 0, amount = -6
The Edit button never appeared anymore for these users.
The idea was that they should see an edit button with
limited editing capabilities depending on their other
access rights.
For example, someone with only Sales Manager access and
'Display Editor Bar on Website'
would be able to edit online quotes from the website_quote
module, but not change the actual website pages or menus,
for instance.
Christophe Simonis
Julien Legros
Arthur Maniet
Fabien Meghazi
Raphael Collet
Olivier Dony
Jeremy Kersten
Denis Ledoux
Xavier Morel
Martin Trigaux
Alexandre Fayolle
Christophe Matthieu