This allows to reset correctly the domain of UoM if the product is not set.
Without this patch, the domain used is the domain of the previous product in
the list.
opw-642074
When we change a product line of an account invoice, a current unit with
a invalid unit category was not dropped which should be since:
- it is different from a sale.order,,
- there is a domain on the unit of measure only allowing units from the product's unit category.
This fixes drop the current unit of mesure in this case.
opw-640985
On an invoice, tax lines are generated in tax_line field. When modifying
manually the tax amount, the recomputed tax_amount field was incorrect in
multicurrency environment, leading to an entry with different tax amount and
debit value.
opw 611474
If a company contact (a partner with a company set as parent) had invoices, and the company of this contact was duplicated, all the invoices lines were duplicated, on the original invoice moreover (new lines were added on existing invoices)
[FIX] account: Preserve analytic account on tax lines which are on same general account as invoice line
After careful analysis, I'm now convinced it is a good thing to preserve
the analytic account on taxes line which have the same general account
as the invoice line.
This is the best default case and will save time for users,
while leaving the flexibility to adapt the analytic account on
taxes manually.
[FIX] account: Error when manually adding analytic account in the generated tax lines on an invoice
fixes#374
fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ocb-addons/+bug/1084822
The fix considers invoice tax lines with different analytic account
are equivalent for the purpose of checking if the list of tax line
is complete.
Caveat, this changes the structure of keys in the dictionary
returned by account.invoice.tax's compute method, I suppose this
is ok for the master branch.
Explicitely refresh invoice browse_record(...) in order to have correct 'date' in account.move.
Use context_today() date instead of time.strftime() for date_invoice. (opw 611210)
The residual amount is typically needed to render the
online payment forms (payment acquirers).
Payments on the other hand rely on account.move.line,
something that portal users should never be allowed to read.
Removing the field from the view by setting a model-level
group permission ensures they will not see an error.
When computing the price difference lines, in move_line_get of account_anglo_saxon, we loop on the result of super call for each lines (n * n times) to compute the price difference.
The product_id was used to match the returned line and the original invoice line. This was wrong as we could get several lines with the same product_id (and then get n * n price difference lines).
This patch adds the line id to the result of move_line_get (from account) so that account_anglo_saxon can filter more efficiently and only get one price difference per invoice line.
Fixes#704
Prior to this fix, the domain was set in the onchange methods onchange_company_id. Therefore, if the onchange was not triggered, the domain wasnt apply (e.g. while editing an existing invoice).
On invoice residual amount computing, we ignore reconcile entries line if their invoice are not of the same type of the current invoice
The above revision(s) will be removed
bzr revid: dle@openerp.com-20140205100324-5tyquozmylcp40p1
Christophe Simonis
Nicolas Martinelli
Nicolas Lempereur
Rifakathusen Haradwala
Denis Ledoux
Stéphane Bidoul
Martin Trigaux
Ravi Gohil
Olivier Dony
Ruchir Shukla
Christophe Simonis
Denis Ledoux
Thibault Delavallée
Christophe Matthieu