To distinguish two ir.attachment 'File Content', we base it on the file
size (this I imagine is for efficiency).
This is done by setting bin_size in the context. Doing this, the
returned db_datas field will be the file size of the converted to base64
content (if no filestore).
But this size is returned in string format, so "get_nice_size" (in
openerp/osv/fields.py) which gets this size calculates the length of the
string. e.g: if the size is '2142' get_nice_size will return 4.
This fix solves this by converting the string to an integer, thus
unifying it with the filestore case (where we use os.path.getsize which
return an integer).
Also, the field presenting the issue (FieldBinaryFile) has been changed
so it is always updated even if the size is the same (as it was already
done by 3632949 for FieldBinaryImage widget).
closes#7223
opw-643071
Required after e17844c946 which
enabled graceful shutdown of workers, including the cron worker.
The latter may typically be busy on long-running tasks that
will not be aborted by a simple graceful shutdown request.
A typical shutdown sequence initiated by a daemon manager such
as start-stop-daemon will involve multiple SIGTERM signals to
ensure the process really stops in a timely manner.
This was not possible after e17844c946
if any cron worker was busy.
Remove languages that were not translated fro, the list of installable languages.
Installing languages with no translations (en_CA) has no effect and having a too
long list is misleading. Sorry Klingon.
Adding languages that were translated but not installable (fr_CA, en_AU)
When setting a custom filter with as domain
[(0, '=', 1)]
the domain was rejected, because (0, '=', 1) wasn't
considered as a valid leaf, while it is.
This is because the Javascript converts this domain
using list instead of tuple
[(0, '=', 1)] -> [[0, '=', 1]]
And therefore, comparing the "list" leaf
to the TRUE/FALSE leaf tuple failed.
Ensuring "element" as a tuple solves the issue.
opw-640306
When importing a CSV file with an "id" column containing
external IDs (XML IDs), the system automatically creates
or updates the corresponding ir.model.data entries.
This would fail for regular users who do not have
create/write access on this internal model.
The ir.ui.view.graph_get() method depended on the natural
semi-random order of Python dict keys in the _columns dict.
When the number and/or names of the _columns happened to
yield the o2m field of the "incoming transitions" *before*
the "outgoing transitions" of the "Node model"
(e.g. workflow activity), it would swap the incoming and
outgoing transitions fields around, causing a crash later
in the `tools.graph.process` method (currently an infinite
loop in the `tree_order()` method of tools.graph.py).
Closes#3614
Fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-server/+bug/1316948
opw-633765
When reading over IN_MAX (currently 1000) records, the select is slip into
subsets of IN_MAX records. However the list of ids was split using set() method
which removes order that may have been pass. The subsets are ordered using
_order attribute but the subsets were not ordered between themself.
This is an issue in case of browsing a o2m field with more than 1000 lines as it
will return sorted blocked but the order of the blocks is the order of the
contained ids (e.g. split(2, [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) -> [[2,1], [4,3], [5]]).
Removes the set() to make sure the order of the given ids is preserved.
opw 616070, linked to #439
`setLang` alters the "browse" context of the documents
being printed, but it must also discard any values
already cached, as they could be using a different language.
This is the case when the report uses translatable fields
on `res.partner`, because `setLang` is usually called
with the target partner language, hence prefetching
the translatable fields with the user's language instead
of the partner's language.
E.g. `setLang(o.partner_id.lang)` will cache any
translatable field on `o.partner_id` in the language of
the *user*, not the *partner*.
When exporting the content of a one2many, if the first row got an empty value,
it was filled with the name_get of all lines and skipped the next lines.
The guessed reason of this was for the representation of the m2m lines but was
left after a proper export of m2m has been implemented (91cafbe).
This code was problematic as it prevented to properly export records with
an empty value on the first line (e.g. credit amount on account.move.line).
Fixes#4218, opw 620178
When updating translations, the source (`src`) is irrelevant for
`field` and `help` translations. Theses translation types are only
matched through their `name`.
fails due to ir.config_parameter permission
At rev. 80017b04c2
ir.config_parameter model has been restricted to employees
Getting parameter from this model should therefore
be done as SUPERUSER_ID where the uid could
be a user which is not an employee.
Closes#5280
This rev. is related to eb9113c04d
if a model or a resource id is not defined on an attachment
restrict access to employees only if the creator
of this attachment is not the current user.
So non-employees can access their attachments without
models/resource id, which includes attachment of
discussions threads.
Fixes#4309Closes#4310
Since revs 53582c2ea6 & f65c913027,
this was no more possible for portal users to read groups
on purpose, for privacy reasons.
fields_get of res.users model is overriden, for
the access rights form view features
(The groups selections and checkboxes).
At each call to fields_get, which happens at each call
to fields_view_get on the res.users model, operations are
done on the model res.groups (basically, to
build the selection groups and checkboxes). So,
each time a view of model res.users is displayed,
whatever the view, operations on res.group model were performed.
The thing is, these operations on res.groups
are actually needed only for the user access rights
view, or at least only for users having the group
Administration > Access rights. These group operations
aren't needed for the preferences view, nor for portal users.
We therefore avoid to do these if the user is not part of the
Administration > Access rights group, which lead to
performances improvment, and solves the fact
portal users couldn't access their user preferences view.
opw-627391
It's always dangerous because (cascade-)deleting workitems
has a great chance of killing the workflow instances they
belong to, putting the records in the workflow limbo
permanently. (They will appear stuck as they don't have
enough workitems anymore)
In addition, in some rare cases a subflow activity is
converted into a regular activity during an update, and
nullifying the `subflow_id` column is all there is to
fixing the corresponding workitems. It will simply take
them out of their subflow, and back into the main flow.
This is the case for the modification of the purchase.order
workflow in Odoo 8 (saas-5), for the picking subflow.
When the ORM is cleaning up related attachments upon record deletion, the
search() method hides the attachment of the record that is being deleted.
If the same file is used exactly once in another attachment, the reference
count will be 1 and the file will be deleted.
Christophe Simonis
Martin Trigaux
Laetitia Gangloff
Nicolas Lempereur
Olivier Dony
Laurent Mignon (ACSONE)
Denis Ledoux
Thomas Rehn
dhr-odoo
Alejandro Santana
David Monjoie
Christophe Combelles
Ravi Gohil
Goffin Simon
Nicolas Martinelli
Stefan Rijnhart
Holger Brunn