Otherwise, if done with the superuser:
- The multi-company rules won't work, the user will have the amount of all invoices, cross-companies
- The amount currency will always be the currency of the superuser
Explicitely refresh invoice browse_record(...) in order to have correct 'date' in account.move.
Use context_today() date instead of time.strftime() for date_invoice. (opw 611210)
At the confirmation of a bank statement, the name may not be set (e.g. generated by point of sale). This field is not requred so make a fallack on the statement line (which is required).
When the context contains 'recompute': False, the recomputation was not even
prepared. Now both create() and write() prepare the recomputation by invoking
method modified(). The flag only controls whether method recompute() is invoked.
In addintion, the former flag 'no_store_function' was converted to the flag
'recompute', so that both create() and write() use the same flag.
Fixes#1456
Avoid revalidating the complete account moves
that contain the lines being reconciled.
The reconciliation does not change the validity
of those moves anyway.
This represents a very important speed up of
reconciliation when moves with several hundred
lines are involved.
The residual amount is typically needed to render the
online payment forms (payment acquirers).
Payments on the other hand rely on account.move.line,
something that portal users should never be allowed to read.
Removing the field from the view by setting a model-level
group permission ensures they will not see an error.
The forward port of the fix 3609ba10f2 will be done separately, as the mrp scheduler has been completely refactored from saas-5.
Conflicts:
addons/l10n_be_coda/wizard/account_coda_import.py
addons/point_of_sale/static/src/xml/pos.xml
addons/procurement/schedulers.py
When computing the price difference lines, in move_line_get of account_anglo_saxon, we loop on the result of super call for each lines (n * n times) to compute the price difference.
The product_id was used to match the returned line and the original invoice line. This was wrong as we could get several lines with the same product_id (and then get n * n price difference lines).
This patch adds the line id to the result of move_line_get (from account) so that account_anglo_saxon can filter more efficiently and only get one price difference per invoice line.
Fixes#704
Problem: the field account_invoice.reconciled was invalidated by a workflow
signal sent from the compute method of the field. The purpose of the signal was
to re-open the invoice when the account move lines were no longer reconciled,
for instance after cancelling a reconciliation.
Solution: modify the workflow such that it makes an automatic transition from
'paid' to 're-open' when the condition 'not reconciled' is met. This works
because the field 'reconciled' is stored, and each recomputation forces a
reevaluation the workflow. The signal to re-open the invoice is thus no longer
necessary.
There is no reason to propagate the context in those buttons.
Besides, it leads to issues concerning the email template, rendering the wrong res_id because the active_id was wrongly propagated
During the conversion of account_invoice.py to the new API, the date_invoice written on the invoice has been moved in the end of the action_move_create method.
But, the method _get_analytic_lines needs it sooner.
* remove old 'day', 'month', 'field' and replace them by the actual
date/datetime field
* remove weird cast to char when creating the view to prevent crash
when grouping on them
* remove duplicates (such as 'creation_date' and 'create_date')
* fix typing errors (field type date defined as a datetime in the
postgres view)
* fix search view definition
- display_name uses name_get and not the other way around:
name_get should not call _compute_display_name, _compute_display_name should call name_get.
The previous behaviour was not backward-compatible with the old api.
All the models redefining name_get would have 2 different behaviors between name_get and display_name.
- Do not set an inverse function to display_name:
In most cases, writing on display_name writes on _rec_name (if any, not mandatory).
If the display_name computation is redefined, we need to redefine as well the inverse method to avoid unexpected behaviour
This required to also modify tests in base_import as readonly fields are avoided.
- Remove search method on display_name:
For the same reason as for the first point, it could be good that searching on display_name use name_search (and not the other way around).
However doing this would be very inefficiant (need to do the search, without limit, extract the ids of the name_get result just to generate
a subdomain ('id', 'in', [...]). As in most cases it would anyway mean to search on the _rec_name it's better to directly do so.
- Changing label to avoid mismatch:
In view displaying the list of fields or when a match is made on the label of a field (e.g. when importing csv file,
matching is made on both label and technical name), the fact that display_name field has '
Calling it 'Display Name' will avoid most errors.
- remove display_name definition from website_forum_doc,ir_model:
These fields are doing the same thing as the display_name of the new api, we can remove them.
We need to keep the one for res.partner as it's a stored field.
When generating reconciled moves in bank statement, use the amount_currency field instead of amount for currency conversion.
Otherwise we would endup with moves with an amount of 0.
If we try to generate twice entries on the same fiscal year, we can get completly unrelated errors ("You can only reconcile journal items with the same partner").
With this, we make sure people will first cancel the entries before regeneraing the entries.
Rebranding has been done in:
- data/demo files
- html templates
- help notices
- comments
- logger messages
- and other various messages
(Commit taken from odoo-dev:8.0-improve-openerp-odoo-rlu at rev 7deaa08)
Closes#1260
Relying on the ordering by tax code is not sufficient,
as some tax declarations such as the Luxemburg one,
show tax case codes not ordered numerically
Original fix courtesy of Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Fixes: lp:1168948
Rebase of: PR #759