Remove the hardcoded precision of 12 on factor and factor_inv,
to use the complete natural precision of NUMERIC types,
preserving all significant digits.
e.g. a UoM with a factor_inv of 6.0 used to be computed as:
factor_inv: 6.0 -> factor: 0.166666666667 (1.0/6.0, rounded to 12 digits) -> factor_inv: 5.999999999988 (1.0/factor)
which could lead to errors such 12*0.166666666667 = 2.000000000004 instead of 2.0
Slightly changed the way the ORM handles float fields to allow setting `digits=0`
as a way to explicitly require a NUMERIC value but without enforcing/rounding
the values at the ORM level, i.e. a truly full-precision field.
NUMERIC type has unlimited precision but is less efficient so should not be
used as the default behaviour, which is why we keep float8 as an alternative.
Modified the view to display the product UOM factor with a 5 digits value by default.
This value is for usability purpose only, the field still accepts bigger precision, by
setting the `digits` option on the field in the form view.
This change is safe in a stable series, the `digits=0` alternative is
treated the same as the default `digits=None` everywhere in the framework,
except when creating the database field.
During the update of a module, the existing foreign keys are dropped if they have a different ondelete_rule than the one specified on the field.
The foreign keys for many2one transiant -> non-transiant are created with cascade rule by default (see `m2o_add_foreign_key_checked` method) so the check needs to be realised in the same conditions.
If any missing or partially incorrect values cause
an exception other than a psycopg2 error, we should
still catch it, rollback that record and report
the error, rather than letting bubble and fail
without any feedback to the user.
Fixes#1485
When a record is created, the magic fields (id, create_date,...) are first removed from the vals as the user should not set a value for these.
However if a value for this is given in default value (e.g. defined in an ir.value), the creation would crash (sql error : column specified more than once) as the magic column would be added again.
At rev 84e9a67cdf a check to avoid the creation of ir.model.relation for custom modules was added. The condition is not correct as based on the string instead of the field name. We do not have access to column name at this level but the the m2m relation table do start with x_ for custom fields (see __init__ method).
orm: do not try to create ir.model.relation for custom m2m as self._module is either empty (for custom models), either the one of the last inheriting module (which is wrong). The field should be removed manually and should not be impacted by the uninstallation of modules. The removal of the relation table can be done when removing manually the custom field (see rev 6af3193).
ir.model: when removing a model, drop the table with the CASCADE instruction. This will remove left constraints from remaining m2m tables.
This means that dropping a table (either manually removing a custom model or uninstalling a module) will not drop the relation table for a custom m2m field. This is not ideal but better than the previous behaviour (which was to fail the DROP TABLE instruction and keep the table with a few columns and unconsistent data).
fixes#595
In the case where a property for the company exists but has no related record (e.g. in case of type m2o with no defined value), not setting a value to this field for a new record would create a new property (as browse_null is not an instance of browse_record)
_read_flat: remove duplicated fields in read call
get many2one: as False is instance of int, check the value of x first to avoid calling a name_get with a list of False
When we were reading twice a m2o field where at least one result is null, the first call to name_get would set the value to False instead of None and then accepted by the filter 'isinstance(x, (int,long))'
The get() method of m2o function fields is used for 2 different things:
- call the function defining the m2o
- get the name_get representation of the value
Until this pathc, only the first case was handled, resulting to a useless
recomputation of the field when reading it.
function fields for other records in the same model. Previously all function fields in the
current model were not computed for some reason not provided by the history.
We therefore compute effective store_ids on which the various trigerred
function fields will be computed again. Those ids are the ids given
in the store_get storage variable minus the deleted ones.
If the o2m field linked to the o2m is stored on a different table (eg: model with _inherit), previous request would crash as the field do not exists in the '_table' sql table
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20140327111241-klftr0s8v8i68nxp
If the o2m field linked to the o2m is stored on a different table (eg: inherit), previous request would crash as the field do not exists in the '_table' sql table
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20140324162130-fyotk8vqmkha43eb
- allow leading spaces in orderby spec for m2o columns
- extra test for read_group on multiple columns
- proper handling of groupby on numeric column with default order
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20140304152927-havybom9x1jgdzae
Fixed the implementation of the sorting for inherited
columns, many2one columns, and aggregated columns.
Added corresponding tests with increased coverage of
the read_group() method.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20140228173320-p8l0jc8op7xsgn1x
Sorting was done using a search on ids that where found in a custom SQL field,
only 1 record among aggregated records with same groupby value was used
when using search for ordering, resulting data ordered on
max(aggregated_data).field_value instead of sum(aggregated_data.field_value).
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1060086 fixed
bzr revid: acl@openerp.com-20140217172926-ka2fw8t2l3cqi7h3
- removing the need of the use of search when groupby is set on a relation
field.
- creation and use of dedicated helper method to compute the orderby clause
for easier reading
bzr revid: acl@openerp.com-20140217140144-2rm3o00g76tyhqxn
Sorting was done using a search on ids that where found in a custom SQL field,
only 1 record among aggregated records with same groupby value was used
when using search for ordering, resulting data ordered on
max(aggregated_data).field_value instead of sum(aggregated_data.field_value).
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/106086 fixed
bzr revid: acl@openerp.com-20140203125854-ypi0bu0lbhatg9b1
Cedric Snauwaert
Denis Ledoux
Martin Trigaux
Martin Ambroz
Samus CTO
Olivier Dony
dhr-odoo
Alexandre Fayolle
Mohammed Shekha
kevin wang
Jeremy Kersten
Christophe Simonis
Oliver Laurent
Thibault Delavallée
jba
Christophe Simonis
Anael Closson