Changes to contentEditable or attributeEditable attributes
should not cause the corresponding section to be marked
as dirty (oe_dirty). This would otherwise cause an extra
editor save() for those, wrongly marking untouched
templates as `noupdate`, and possibly triggering access
right errors.
If the salary compuation gives a salary of zero, skip the creation of the account.move.line (not good to have lines at 0).
Fixes lp:1298116, opw 605816
The field date_close is only computed when writing the state done. In v8, the phonecalls are always created in state done if the user is not in the group crm.group_scheduled_calls (displays menus to schedule calls.
As the field date_closed is then almost never set, change the date field by the one displayed in the form view. opw 614893
[IMP] Recheck should be type object and procure_method read only when not in draft
[FIX] Inversion of moves in the correct way and assigning production_id
As the moves are split the other way, the original move needs to be done. Also the production_id for linking the
new to be produced moves and the production order must be written on those.
[IMP] Clean
A previous refactoring brought a bom_line_ids field on the mrp.bom, thus
deprecating the _child_compute method. But the previous refactoring did
not go through all the views, breaking everything that relied on the
_child_compute (tree view, report). As the bom_line_ids refers to the
mrp.bom.line model (introduced by this previous refactoring, note:
_child_compute returned mrp.bom record) and that we can't make a treeview
showing different model, this patch introduce a function field _get_child_bom_lines
on the mrp.line model, allowing to go through the bom_line_ids of a mrp.bom.line
if this mrp.bom.line refers to a mrp.bom.
[IMP] Rename bom_line_ids to child_line_ids in mrp_bom_line to avoid confusion
Module description of procurement was deprecated (talking about mrp, ...) and in product_extended
it described things not implemented in the module.
In _bom_find, we passed a UoM which was not used in Saas-4 and it would not be logical that you
need to select a BoM that matches the UoM, so I removed it.
In the demo data, there was still a push rule which triggered a move from output to pack. The copy=False
is correct for production_id when you would have these push rules.
For the properties: we want to allow to take a bom which has no properties, but only when there is no other
BoM matching the properties we pass.
Update module descriptions
[IMP] production_id copy + no round
[IMP] _bom_find without uom, property correction
Simplify the action_consume of the consumption lines after the corrections
by Kevin Wang. Also the UoMs are revised as the action_consume uses the default UoM
of the product.
We have to avoid circular boms where a child bom should not contain the product that
represents the parent bom, but it is possible for example to use another product of the parent bom in
the child bom.
As the consume line move has no procurement rule, its origin will have no description. So, when there is
none it will also check the description of the previous move (when passed to procurement for example) This way
the chained moves or purchase order for example will have the MO-number as origin and not nothing.
[IMP] Change assignation
[IMP] UoM changes continuation
[IMP] Make sure we can use 2 times the same product in a BoM
[IMP] Source document for consume lines to procurement
This reverts commit d4972ffdb6.
Seems to break some cases, at least in _product_reserve from stock/stock.py
Actual use case:
SELECT product_uom, sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_dest_id=%s AND location_id<>%s AND product_id=3645 AND state='done' GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | 6
SELECT product_uom,-sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_id=%s AND location_dest_id<>%s AND product_id=%s AND state in ('done', 'assigned') GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | -6
results += cr.dictfetchall()
total = 0.0
results2 = 0.0
for r in results:
amount = uom_obj._compute_qty(cr, uid, r['product_uom'], r['product_qty'], context.get('uom', False))
results2 += amount
total += amount
Total = 1, amount = -5
It should actually be
Total = 0, amount = -6
The Edit button never appeared anymore for these users.
The idea was that they should see an edit button with
limited editing capabilities depending on their other
access rights.
For example, someone with only Sales Manager access and
'Display Editor Bar on Website'
would be able to edit online quotes from the website_quote
module, but not change the actual website pages or menus,
for instance.
Denis Ledoux
Olivier Dony
Christophe Matthieu
Christophe Simonis
qdp-odoo
Raphael Collet
Thibault Delavallée
dhr-odoo
Martin Trigaux
Simon Lejeune
Josse Colpaert
Alexandre Fayolle
kevin wang
xmo-odoo
Erwin van der Ploeg
Fabien Meghazi
Jérome Maes
Nick-OpusVL