opw-617036:
In my current timesheet, if you add a a required field on the timesheet ids lines, and add data in the summary tab, it was possible to validate the timesheet lines while requried fields were missing.
In edit mode, in a *2many with many2many_tags, when adding a new tag when none was set, discarding the form let the new tags displayed while it shouldn't (only a display issue, the tag wasn't added in database)
Fixes#2926
The cleditor width does not include the margins. Setting 100% will make the editable area too large (104%) on Firefox (opw 611700).
This issue was already fixed in newer releases, from commit 9247c37de7
Nevertheless, it introduced a new issue: while editing the form, the content of widgets html which were located in hidden notebook pages weren't displayed when displaying the page content.
opw-614448
By default, on binary images read, the server returns the binary size
This is possible that two images have the exact same size
Therefore we trigger the change in case the image value hasn't changed
So the image is re-rendered correctly
If an action unlink the current records (e.g. unreconcile on account.move.reconcile), trigger history_back to avoid errors when trying to reload inexistant record (opw 607883)
This is a partial backport of saas-4 code (rev c0db6ae, 162ad1c) and should not be forward ported.
When searching for a record in a m2o field, if we click on 'search more' we loose the focus on the field and select the first suggestion (which triggers potential on_change). This prevents the selection for this case.
In editable list, on keypress enter, the _next method is called, saving the current line and starting the edition of the next one
The _next is triggered before the date(time) field change event, and, therefore, the saved value of the date(time) field is the old one
On SearchPopupCreation, if we have initial_ids - 1st search_read() will be
missing custom context defined on the field.
1. defined view like this: <field name='my_many2one_field_id' context="{'test': 1}"/>
2. in we expand the list of available item, name_search() has 'test' in context
3. in we click on 'Search More', search_read() is missing 'test' in context
4. if we change filter add/remove item, search_read() will have 'test' in context
Step 3. is wrong, should also have 'test' in context
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1209295 fixed
bzr revid: mat@openerp.com-20140311091522-03imwd5rj3rmwapl
IME are ways to input language which can't trivially map to a keyboard
(e.g. CJK language) with a standard-ish keyboard. For japanese IME
this is done by entering text phonetically: text is entered in romaji
and automatically converted to hiragana (or katakana) when it matches
the transcription a japanese syllable (~phoneme?) e.g. to (と). The
text is then split and reprocessed with sequences of hiragana being
converted to kanji (or not), and the possibility to pick the right
kanji when multiple kanji match e.g. for "Tokyo" toukyou -> とうきょう
-> 東京.
But to do the edition, keyboard keys are used. For the japanese IMEs
(tested on Windows, OSX and Linux) [Space] will do the initial
conversion from kana to kanji (and allow selecting an other conversion
or a different kana split) and [Return] will validate the current
conversion (removing the underline marking "unvalidated" kana or kanji
groups).
And that's where the problem hit: IME + browser combinations may or
may not suppress part of all of the event. Firefox will trigger a
keydown of the key which "starts" IME input (e.g. "t") and will
trigger a keyup for the validation key (return), except on Linux where
the initial keydown is suppressed. Inbetween these, it will fire no
keydown, keyup or keypress event but will fire input events (at least
on an input element) every time the displayed text changes.
Meanwhile webkit browsers will, for each press on the keyboard during
IME,
* trigger a keydown with the keyCode 229
* trigger a keyup event with the keycode of the key which was actually
hit
* trigger input events every time the displayed text changes
This include meta-operation uses of [Space] and [Return].
MSIE has the same behavior (including triggering the input event), but
the keydown event is augmented with ``key`` and ``char`` attributes
providing the character matching the key hit to trigger the change.
Although the triggering of the input even is useless for the purpose
of the editable list (especially here, the purpose of validating a
list row with [Return] one fact stands out: keypress is never
triggered during IME operations, hitting the [Return] key outside of
IME will trigger keydow, keypress, keyup but doing so during IME will
only trigger the first and last.
Thus by changing the binding from keyup (return) to keypress (return)
for a line validation, spurious validation during IME text entry
should be avoided. This seems to work correctly on MSIE (Windows),
Firefox (Windows, OSX, Linux), Chrome (Windows, OSX, Linux) and Safari
(OSX), after testing in IE9, IE10, Chrome 31, Firefox 25 and Safari 7,
and a quick test on a task's o2m did not reveal any regression.
note: not all differences between various browser/os combinations were
inspected in details, there may well be further differences which were
not noticed or not relevant to this precise issue.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20131206124431-q4a9l1gn9wjtmlvz