The report includes all due payments, not only the one after the maturity date.
The maturity date is displayed in the report so no confusion is possible for payments below the maturity date.
Fixes#3064
To valid all editable list line, we iterate on the lines and set the editor form with the line value, using set_value.
The _inhibit_on_change_flag should be set to True to avoid triggering on changes events
opw-617395
When validating a SO containing a `make to stock` + `manufacture` product
(with bom + orderpoint), we have the following stock moves:
* Product move
* Manufacturing order
Selling 1 such product would yield 2 as incoming quantity, an
inconsistency that this commit solves by setting the location_id of the
product move to the MO's location_dest_id (in the same fashion that
the create_pickings method does in an mts/buy case)
opw-616229
This is related to rev. a218a9ed3f
The condition is good, but not in the right place: It should be done once all read_slice (all columns records) are fetched, not at each read_slice end
Some prices, as standard_price, being a property, are company dependent. Therefore, when browsing as superuser, force_company is mandatory to get the property of the user company
[FIX] account: Preserve analytic account on tax lines which are on same general account as invoice line
After careful analysis, I'm now convinced it is a good thing to preserve
the analytic account on taxes line which have the same general account
as the invoice line.
This is the best default case and will save time for users,
while leaving the flexibility to adapt the analytic account on
taxes manually.
[FIX] account: Error when manually adding analytic account in the generated tax lines on an invoice
fixes#374
fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ocb-addons/+bug/1084822
The fix considers invoice tax lines with different analytic account
are equivalent for the purpose of checking if the list of tax line
is complete.
Caveat, this changes the structure of keys in the dictionary
returned by account.invoice.tax's compute method, I suppose this
is ok for the master branch.
opw-617036:
In my current timesheet, if you add a a required field on the timesheet ids lines, and add data in the summary tab, it was possible to validate the timesheet lines while requried fields were missing.
When a line is not present in the partial delivery wizard, computation variables are initialized with generic values (zero quantity, zero price,...). Instead of setting the uom to False, keep the quantity of the move.
This makes a difference only when the quantity of the move is 0. That means that the move will be marked as complete and can be processed.
This avoids trying to update the stock.move with a uom at False. opw 616844
This is a workaround for an ORM limitation. A stored function field is
not updated when it should if the "source" field is also a stored function
field
In certain cases, before running an update unregistered models will try to
register hooks. Trying to wrap create and write on these will cause
AttributeError on model_obj which would be None
Signed-off-by: Sandy Carter <sandy.carter@savoirfairelinux.com>
Implements the UoS TODO items on stock.picking.do_partial() to fix#1432.
Add a new method _compute_uos_qty() on product.product to computes
product's invoicing quantity in UoS from quantity in UoM.
The created invoice will use the product_uos of the stock.move, meaning keeping
the quantity specified on the partial picking and the unit of measure of the
original stock.move (e.g. recieving 1 dozen from a 12 unit picking should either
get uos=dozen, uos_qty=1 or uos=unit, uos_qty=12, not a mix of both)
Fixes#1432, opw 611479
General totals were not computed at all, due to the condition "if not self.ids" which was always true as self.ids wasn't set.
Besides, a parameter allows to display only partner with balance greater than 0, which was completely ignored by the totals computation methods: The totals always included all partners, even those having balance equals to 0
When generating the report 'Timesheet Profit', got a warning "The domain term '('user_id', '=', [...])' should use the 'in' or 'not in' operator."
This warning is due to the use of the '=' operator to compare the field 'user_id' while the reports sends a list of ids.
Fallback to still accept a single id in case of customised reports.
Source and destination locations are required and not displayed in the form view.
Adding new items when recieving a picking can not be easily guessed as we can put different locations for each line, using default locations may not be the expected result.
Instead should modify the original picking or create new one.
Fixes#2074, opw 612768
At the end of the onchange call product_id_change, the uom may have changed (e.g. if product in different category).
To compute the quantity, we need to use the new uom and not the first one (that may be Unit, default value)
Julien Legros
Martin Trigaux
Denis Ledoux
Manuel Vázquez Acosta
Stéphane Bidoul
Sheth Sunny
Thibault Delavallée
Christophe Simonis
Paramjit Singh Sahota
Mohammad Alhashash
Sandy Carter
Jeremy Kersten
Antonio Esposito
Ravi Gohil
Frederic van der Essen