| .. |
|
i18n
|
[MERGE] merged with main trunk
|
2013-10-10 15:32:12 +02:00 |
|
report
|
[MERGE] merged with main trunk
|
2013-10-10 15:32:12 +02:00 |
|
security
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-16 12:03:18 +02:00 |
|
static
|
[IMP] stock_picking_ui: new menu to select the picking by type or barcode + correctly restrict picking navigation by type in main screen
|
2013-10-03 11:49:04 +02:00 |
|
test
|
[MERGE] merged with main trunk
|
2013-10-10 15:32:12 +02:00 |
|
wizard
|
[MERGE] mergedf jke branch with removal of useless picking_id field on mrp.production + temporary commented crashing yaml test
|
2013-10-16 09:33:02 +02:00 |
|
__init__.py
|
[IMP] Invoice on picking cleaned
|
2013-08-04 13:53:25 +02:00 |
|
__openerp__.py
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-16 12:03:18 +02:00 |
|
board_warehouse_view.xml
|
[IMP] tests YAML stock
|
2013-06-30 22:13:23 +02:00 |
|
partner.py
|
[WIP] split stock module in stock and stock_account that installs itself only if account+stock are installed
|
2013-07-11 15:05:28 +02:00 |
|
partner_view.xml
|
[IMP]Remove type field from the modules
|
2012-08-09 11:35:16 +05:30 |
|
procurement.py
|
[FIX] stock, sale_stock: changed the way the procurements look for a suitable rule => Added a m2o field warehouse_id on procurement.order, procurement.rule and stock.move. There was a problem with MTO products because they weren't following the route of the chosen warehouse at all (since all warehouse were creating their rule in the same route, there was no garantee that the route chosen was included in the warehouse selected on the SO)
|
2013-10-22 14:06:05 +02:00 |
|
procurement_demo.xml
|
[IMP] Move route_ids from product from stock_location to stock and remove supply_method (change with route)
|
2013-09-09 13:55:15 +02:00 |
|
product.py
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-17 14:13:49 +02:00 |
|
product_view.xml
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-16 12:03:18 +02:00 |
|
res_config.py
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-16 12:03:18 +02:00 |
|
res_config_view.xml
|
merge sto sto_loc
|
2013-10-04 16:56:59 +02:00 |
|
stock.py
|
[FIX] stock, sale_stock: changed the way the procurements look for a suitable rule => Added a m2o field warehouse_id on procurement.order, procurement.rule and stock.move. There was a problem with MTO products because they weren't following the route of the chosen warehouse at all (since all warehouse were creating their rule in the same route, there was no garantee that the route chosen was included in the warehouse selected on the SO)
|
2013-10-22 14:06:05 +02:00 |
|
stock_data.xml
|
[MERGE] merged with main feature branch
|
2013-10-16 12:03:18 +02:00 |
|
stock_data.yml
|
[FIX] stock: xml_ids references due to the merge of stock and stock_location
|
2013-10-16 11:34:46 +02:00 |
|
stock_demo.xml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_demo.yml
|
[FIX] stock: xml_ids references due to the merge of stock and stock_location
|
2013-10-16 11:34:46 +02:00 |
|
stock_demo_pre.yml
|
[FIX] stock: xml_ids references due to the merge of stock and stock_location
|
2013-10-16 11:34:46 +02:00 |
|
stock_incoterms.xml
|
[IMP]remove tabs and add spaces instead of them
|
2012-06-28 12:10:05 +05:30 |
|
stock_location_data.xml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_location_demo_cpu1.xml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_location_demo_cpu3.yml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_orderpoint.xml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_orderpoint.yml
|
merge sto-stoloc data
|
2013-10-10 14:03:31 +02:00 |
|
stock_report.xml
|
[FIX] stock: allow modification of stock.picking.{in,out} reports via report designer
|
2013-08-23 15:12:14 +02:00 |
|
stock_sequence.xml
|
[WIP] Remove stock_journal, change name and origin of created procurement, remove some remaining picking in/out, add sequence on dropship
|
2013-07-25 16:43:35 +02:00 |
|
stock_view.xml
|
[FIX] stock, sale_stock: changed the way the procurements look for a suitable rule => Added a m2o field warehouse_id on procurement.order, procurement.rule and stock.move. There was a problem with MTO products because they weren't following the route of the chosen warehouse at all (since all warehouse were creating their rule in the same route, there was no garantee that the route chosen was included in the warehouse selected on the SO)
|
2013-10-22 14:06:05 +02:00 |
441d0bc009