9
0
Fork 0

Partition layer updates

- route MEMGETINFO through partition layer
- use dev_erase/dev_protect instead of direct pointers

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Sascha Hauer 2008-08-13 14:37:13 +02:00
parent 1fbb5f65d6
commit 9e64db6342
1 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -87,10 +87,7 @@ static int part_erase(struct device_d *dev, size_t count, unsigned long offset)
{
struct partition *part = dev->type_data;
if (part->physdev->driver->erase)
return part->physdev->driver->erase(part->physdev, count, offset + part->offset);
return -1;
return dev_erase(part->physdev, count, offset + part->offset);
}
/**
@ -105,10 +102,7 @@ static int part_protect(struct device_d *dev, size_t count, unsigned long offset
{
struct partition *part = dev->type_data;
if (part->physdev->driver->protect)
return part->physdev->driver->protect(part->physdev, count, offset + part->offset, prot);
return -1;
return dev_protect(part->physdev, count, offset + part->offset, prot);
}
/**
@ -131,7 +125,7 @@ static int part_memmap(struct device_d *dev, void **map, int flags)
return 0;
}
return -1;
return -ENOSYS;
}
/**
@ -203,6 +197,8 @@ static int part_ioctl(struct device_d *dev, int request,
offset = (off_t)buf;
offset += part->offset;
return dev_ioctl(part->physdev, request, (void *)offset);
case MEMGETINFO:
return dev_ioctl(part->physdev, request, buf);
}
return -ENOSYS;