generic-poky/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc

48 lines
1.9 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

#
# Default virtual providers
#
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/db ?= "db"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/db-native ?= "db-native"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver ?= "xserver-xorg"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver-xf86 ?= "xserver-xorg"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/egl ?= "mesa"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgl ?= "mesa"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgles1 ?= "mesa"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgles2 ?= "mesa"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/mesa ?= "mesa"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives ?= "opkg"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/update-alternatives-native ?= "opkg-native"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11 ?= "libx11"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_xf86-video-intel ?= "xf86-video-intel"
#
# Default virtual runtime providers
#
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives ?= "update-alternatives-cworth"
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_apm ?= "apm"
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_alsa-state ?= "alsa-state"
#
# Default recipe providers
#
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib ?= "dbus-glib"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_dbus-glib-native ?= "dbus-glib-native"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gdk-pixbuf ?= "gdk-pixbuf"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_libgcc ?= "libgcc"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_nativesdk-libgcc ?= "nativesdk-libgcc"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers ?= "linux-libc-headers"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_nativesdk-linux-libc-headers ?= "nativesdk-linux-libc-headers"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_matchbox-panel ?= "matchbox-panel-2"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_opkg ?= "opkg"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_opkg-native ?= "opkg-native"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_nativesdk-opkg ?= "nativesdk-opkg"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_console-tools ?= "kbd"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_gzip-native ?= "pigz-native"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_make ?= "make"
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_udev ?= "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES','systemd','systemd','udev',d)}"
default-providers: Set the preferred provider for bluez There is a need for a default provider for bluez now that bluez5 recipe is also present. After the introduction of bluez5 recipe, the following warnings are displayed: "NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime libasound-module-bluez (bluez4, bluez5) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match libasound-module-bluez" Upon debug, bitbake shows: DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez4 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez4-4.101 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez4-4.101-r5 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez5 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez5-5.7 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] DEBUG: checking PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez5-5.7-r0 (value None) against ['bluez4', 'bluez5'] Bitbake is faced with the question "what should provide libasound-module-bluez?" which is a runtime name. It needs to try and find a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry which matches this but those use *build time* naming. So it converts "libasound-module-bluez" into the canonical ${PN} of bluez4 and bluez5 and then tries to look those up. What it actually should do is go one step further of mapping bluez4/bluez5 into the virtual/bluez but that does not happen. Bug opened on this issue: YB5044 https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5044 [YOCTO #5030] (From OE-Core rev: 6f07d066074b1e01ff3c16408812e6b6d5e531ac) Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2013-08-21 13:02:03 +00:00
# There are issues with runtime packages and PREFERRED_PROVIDER, see YOCTO #5044 for details
# on this rather strange entry.
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_bluez4 ?= "bluez4"
# Alternative is ltp-ddt in meta-oe: meta-oe/recipes-devtools/ltp-ddt/ltp-ddt_0.0.4.bb
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_ltp ?= "ltp"