package.bbclass: enable the use of package_qa_handle_error

This will allow the reporting of these errors as either WARNINGs (default)
or ERRORs if installed_vs_shipped is added to the ERROR_QA of the policy
file (such as a <distro_name>.conf file.

V2: found the code I had intended to send instead of that other junk,
    was just not watching what I pushed on that one, sorry. (this is edit in
    no in the actual commit message)

(From OE-Core rev: 20d4205a4e408b6a99db392d4df458156113106a)

Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Saul Wold 2012-07-02 17:40:37 -07:00 committed by Richard Purdie
parent f47c151aea
commit 0a1d5f5977
1 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -988,9 +988,13 @@ python populate_packages () {
unshipped.append(path)
if unshipped != []:
bb.warn("For recipe %s, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:" % pn)
for f in unshipped:
bb.warn(" " + f)
msg = pn + ": Files/directories were installed but not shipped"
if "installed_vs_shipped" in (d.getVar('INSANE_SKIP_' + pn, True) or "").split():
bb.note("Package %s skipping QA tests: installed_vs_shipped" % pn)
else:
for f in unshipped:
msg = msg + "\n " + f
package_qa_handle_error("installed_vs_shipped", msg, d)
bb.build.exec_func("package_name_hook", d)