lib/oe/utils: 'Fix' oe.utils.contains() behaviour
Currently oe.utils.contains(X, "A", true, false) will return true for substring matches, e.g. if X = "ABC". This is not what most users expect from the function. In the common OE use of this function there is the case of "touchscreen" and "screen" being used as independent variables. Whilst it could be argued there isn't a problem in that specific case (touchscreens are usually on screens), there is no substring usage of this function is OE-Core so this patch changes the behaviour to match only full strings. It also fixes a bug where duplicate entries would confuse multiple matches, e.g. contains(X, ["A", "B"], ...) would match X = "A A" which is clearly wrong. (From OE-Core rev: 5c09cbe3bf456e968fc853827698eb18b62e8348) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b163a0bca6
commit
3300065035
|
@ -35,16 +35,15 @@ def version_less_or_equal(variable, checkvalue, truevalue, falsevalue, d):
|
|||
return falsevalue
|
||||
|
||||
def contains(variable, checkvalues, truevalue, falsevalue, d):
|
||||
val = bb.data.getVar(variable,d,1)
|
||||
val = d.getVar(variable, True)
|
||||
if not val:
|
||||
return falsevalue
|
||||
matches = 0
|
||||
if type(checkvalues).__name__ == "str":
|
||||
checkvalues = [checkvalues]
|
||||
for value in checkvalues:
|
||||
if val.find(value) != -1:
|
||||
matches = matches + 1
|
||||
if matches == len(checkvalues):
|
||||
val = set(val.split())
|
||||
if isinstance(checkvalues, basestring):
|
||||
checkvalues = set(checkvalues.split())
|
||||
else:
|
||||
checkvalues = set(checkvalues)
|
||||
if checkvalues.issubset(val):
|
||||
return truevalue
|
||||
return falsevalue
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue