base.bbclass: fix substring matching in COMMERCIAL_LICENSE
Previously, if for example you had a package called "mx", and a second package called "libomxil" listed in COMMERCIAL_LICENSE (without mx being listed there), it would match mx as being commercially licensed because mx is a substring of libomxil. Fix the search to ensure it only matches the listed package name exactly. (From OE-Core rev: b23e51e6c961cf3f7e2aaf89648fecce78424c99) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
52835dd301
commit
95d3988846
|
@ -340,9 +340,9 @@ python () {
|
|||
if license == "INVALID":
|
||||
bb.fatal('This recipe does not have the LICENSE field set (%s)' % pn)
|
||||
|
||||
commercial_license = bb.data.getVar('COMMERCIAL_LICENSE', d, 1)
|
||||
commercial_license = " %s " % bb.data.getVar('COMMERCIAL_LICENSE', d, 1)
|
||||
import re
|
||||
pnr = pn.replace('+', "\+")
|
||||
pnr = "[ \t]%s[ \t]" % pn.replace('+', "\+")
|
||||
if commercial_license and re.search(pnr, commercial_license):
|
||||
bb.debug(1, "Skipping %s because it's commercially licensed" % pn)
|
||||
raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("because it may require a commercial license to ship in a product (listed in COMMERCIAL_LICENSE)")
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue