Just because a recipe uses pkgconfig, it doesn't mean that it's -dev
package should RDEPENDS on pkgconfig. I can understand the thinking
that lead to this but it makes sense to be able to install the package
when pkgconfig hasn't been built.
Currently you can also get failures where pkgconfig wasn't built yet
a -dev package is included that depends on it leading to rootfs failures.
I considered making this a RRECOMMENDS but it should probably be an
RSUGGESTS at best given the tenuous pkgconfig requirement any given
-dev package has.
(From OE-Core rev: 8f41b69578eef5ea750e8f93dcd9d37375ce7d88)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As discussed on the mailing lists, using a suffix to package names is
hard and has lead to many recipes having to do PKGSUFFIX games. Its
looking extremely hard to scale nativesdk much further without hacking
many recipes.
By comparison, using a prefix like multilib does works much better and
doesn't involve "hacking" as many recipes. This change converts nativesdk
to use a prefix using the existing multilib infrastructure.
(From OE-Core rev: 81813c0e322dc04ce4b069117188d8a54dfddb8c)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For -nativesdk, the dependency should be pkgconfig-nativesdk instead of
pkgconfig.
(From OE-Core rev: 36c0d1fdc71f9c63699049911aeddb07a746ca4a)
Signed-off-by: Lianhao Lu <lianhao.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, pkgconfig dependencies get added to -dev packages which install
pc files however nothing in the system makes bitbake aware of these
dependencies so images can fail with pkgconfig being missing.
This change explictly adds in the pkgconfig RDEPENDS to the -dev packages
and hence makes bitbake aware of the dependency.
(From OE-Core rev: 23e773eb8b70a5e36270b2e6415512b7dc4f1e05)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Richard Purdie
Lianhao Lu
Richard Purdie
Richard Purdie
Marcin Juszkiewicz