When rpmdeps files a perl script, it attempts to determine what it provides
and what it requires. Often the requires are incorrect, within the context
of Wind River Linux. This results in an error that DNF is unable to install
a package due to one or more unresolved dependencies.
In RPM5 we had disabled this behavior, the alternative is to require that all
perl scripts be 'complete', in that they only require things they absolutely
need and that OE provides. If we ever enforce that, this commit can be
reverted. Until they fall back to prior behavior (which also matches ipkg
and deb style packages.)
(From OE-Core rev: bd8e5dc3ebabb3d88169e2f848219ca201fa5fdb)
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Also modify a Python script (pythondistdeps.py) to use Python 3.
(From OE-Core rev: 18116c1490e6ef09ad5046db7f90dbcbe4caf595)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will send the output from rpmfcPrint() to stdout. This is an
alternative to using the --rpmfcdebug option, which will send the same
output to stderr. The two options have totally different use cases
though. While --alldeps is used when the output from rpmfcPrint() is
what is wanted, --rpmfcdebug can be used together with the other
output options, e.g., --requires, without affecting their output.
(From OE-Core rev: 7a4794534bb2e67c61262361f907eced18ec69cc)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This avoids the following warning:
warning: Ignoring invalid regex %{_docdir}
when runing `rpmdeps -R <file>`, since %{_docdir} is only defined when
parsing a spec file.
(From OE-Core rev: c128e19d25f2015ce1bed13b423ac0d6e619ef5e)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it
is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such.
(From OE-Core rev: 8d9cca4956ba1d8438e185af8baa2b64809d7c86)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rather than trying to call rpmdeps with the correct arguments to work
with the sysroot as was done in package.bbclass, create a wrapper for
it like all the other native tools already had.
(From OE-Core rev: 8279881fb0a65b238c6d484a45a71b6c4dd433e2)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use a loop rather than calling create_wrapper for each individual
tool.
(From OE-Core rev: d052c534c5099b9927ec84b23e01341f0aa3ce7d)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently the file encodes full paths to various host tools in the
HOSTTOOLS directory which is bad in native and target cases. We can
simply use the versions from PATH quite safely in OE.
(From OE-Core rev: be901200d94beaa35e1d05eb502b117b3b523609)
(From OE-Core rev: 2a12c159aae9877a05e0ba023de278cdca59ac45)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These tools are not currently used for anything, but we should
still provide working versions of them.
[YOCTO #11400]
(From OE-Core rev: da11fbde6f8164e2774068b99bab84e4b6084713)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The rpm 5 has a rpm-build package, so here should use RPROVIDES rather
than PROVIDES to keep compatibility.
(From OE-Core rev: de2ee88f9cc0fc8d6d92ac2a79364e79a99ae98e)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
rpm 5.x was packaging build tools separately, so we need to unbreak
things that relied on that.
[YOCTO #11167]
(From OE-Core rev: 3b5ac72bdf76ac8ff98dc3c882a4edc77c6e2c33)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The dnf stack is written and tested against rpm 4.x. So if we want to use dnf for packaging,
we should also use rpm 4 - there's simply too much work involved in making rpm 5 work with it due
to significant API differences, and supporting that going forward.
(From OE-Core rev: 2358e786ec8d1199d90e181eb5d8d00816f669b4)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Mark Hatle
Peter Kjellerstedt
Richard Purdie
Alexander Kanavin
Robert Yang