Create config fragment if the user makes modifications to kernel config.
User may change .config e.g. by directly editing it or by running the
'do_menuconfig' bitbake task. Devtool generates one monolithic fragment
by simply doing a diff between .config and .config.baseline files in the
source directory. If either of these files is missing, the config
fragment is not gerenrated or updated. The output is a file,
'devtool-fragment.cfg' that gets added to SRC_URI in the recipe (as well
as copied into the 'oe-local-files' directory if that is present in the
source tree).
${S}/.config will be a symlink to ${B}/.config. We need to do this as
devtool is not able to access ${B} because ${B} is set in a .bbappend in
the workspace layer which is not parsed by devtool itself.
[YOCTO #8999]
(From OE-Core rev: 524da136e5b837a60682516ac08f3092c635e934)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Copy kernel config is copied to the source directory at a later phase in
_extract_source() so that it gets copied when devtool sync is done, too.
(From OE-Core rev: ff895be7a46c4b3b1b791e5387490d90bb34fce2)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I should have adjusted this in OE-Core commit
80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac where the behaviour changed.
(From OE-Core rev: 13409a2b899bb74b8060c840b8c7ef8759d099cb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If files would be overwritten by the deployment, preserve them in a
separate location on the target so that they can be restored if you
later run devtool undeploy-target.
At the same time, also check for sufficient space before starting the
operation so that we avoid potentially failing part way through.
Fixes [YOCTO #8978].
(From OE-Core rev: a2da55712691bcf1066c53d813107d75213d6b10)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you want to put the target device back to exactly how it was before
devtool deploy-target started poking things into it, then it would make
things easier if you didn't have to figure out which recipes were
deployed. Now that we have the list stored on the target we can
determine this reliably, so add a -a/--all option to undeploy-target to
undeploy everything that has been deployed.
One of the side-effects of this is that the dry-run functionality for
undeploy-target had to be reimplemented to actually run the script on
the target, since we have no way of knowing what's been deployed from
the host side. We don't need to do the same for deploy-target though
since we know exactly which files will be deployed without referring to
the target.
(From OE-Core rev: 41fed83060f0041e14e455d1446397bda277d953)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When running devtool deploy-target, we save a list of deployed files,
and this list is used by devtool undeploy-target (or the next time
deploy-target is run if the list is present, in case any files have been
renamed or deleted since the first time). We were writing this file to
the host, but it makes more sense to write the list to the target
instead, so that if we for example swap in a different board, or switch
hosts, things will work as expected.
In order to do this properly we have to construct a shell script and
ship it over to the target so we can run it. The manifest is written out
to a hidden directory in the root (/.devtool).
Fixes [YOCTO #7908].
(From OE-Core rev: a16a0c9334b785e2df896266c8911a2c7a1806b8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Get the default value for updateserver from the configuration file and
show it in the help; also only make the parameter optional if it's
specified. This means we can also drop the check in the function as
argparse will then ensure it's specified if there's no config setting.
(From OE-Core rev: 82497bde58fc8bdae8d8acfbf025a1a90b14cc3e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a long description used when running --help on the specific command.
(From OE-Core rev: eb7787d1652fd84a149fd394969f4f1099406051)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting
to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular
order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those
modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as
being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands
and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of
the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no
built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add,
but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be
extended by any plugin as desired.
To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group=
parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify
an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the
list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to
force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use
subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and
optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers
appear first).
(From OE-Core rev: e1b9d31e6ea3c254ecfe940fe795af44761e0e69)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we didn't make any changes to the file then there's no point warning
the user that we have done.
(From OE-Core rev: 391b9ba30d802ac420ddf382588e03e718861c01)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If files had been created next to the recipe (for example devtool add,
edit the source and commit and then devtool update-recipe), running
devtool reset failed to preserve those files and gave an error due
to trying to rmdir the directory containing them which wasn't empty.
Fix the preservation of files in the "attic" directory properly so
we catch anything under the directory for the recipe, and replicate
the same structure in the attic directory rather than slightly
flattening it as we were before.
(From OE-Core rev: bbe63eb97ae7f78959f117d6066ef821c4da1c77)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Looking at Chris Larson's code for starting the user's editor for
"recipetool newappend" it was slightly better than what I wrote for
"devtool edit-recipe" in that it checks VISUAL as well as EDITOR and
defaults to vi if neither are set, so break this out to its own function
and call it from both places. The broken out version passes shell=True
however in case it's a more complicated command rather than just a name
of an executable.
(From OE-Core rev: 184a256931e8cdc7bea97a905c4e67a435964de0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There is no -N/--name option for devtool, that's a recipetool option -
with devtool you just specify the name as a positional argument.
(From OE-Core rev: d2bc0cba5ca8a7220ffe1ef96acf856fe972ce7c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix a regression introduced in in OE-Core revision
aedfc5a5db1c4b2b80a36147c9a13b31764d91dd where specifying a local source
tree without specifying a name resulted in a traceback.
Fixes [YOCTO #9086].
(From OE-Core rev: 67ea9d21f20a371a0ee443b46326018cb1527b62)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's going to be more common for users not to have the prepared source
tree for a recipe already, so the default behaviour ought to be to
extract it for them from the recipe. Change the default to extract
(effectively making the -x option a no-op) and add a --no-extract/-n
option to disable it. Later we can look at trying to be smart and
reusing an existing source tree instead of erroring out if it exists;
for now this is just the default reversal.
(From OE-Core rev: 80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting source for a recipe, if there are additional custom
tasks run that make changes to the source, create a commit in the
generated git branch so they are contained. This is particularly
useful for tasks that come before do_patch since otherwise the changes
might get incorporated in the first applied patch, but otherwise it
helps avoid the tree being dirty at any point.
Fixes [YOCTO #7626].
(From OE-Core rev: 997a77d9b20af1778b804778e5d8c8a7424f7582)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you need to set EXTRA_OECONF for a recipe, you need to know what
options the configure script actually supports; the configure script
however is only accessible from within a devshell and (at least in the
case of autotooled software fetched from an SCM repository) may not
actually exist until do_configure has run. Thus, provide a "devtool
configure-help" subcommand that runs the configure script for a recipe
with --help and shows you the output through a pager (e.g. less),
prefaced by a header describing the current options being specified.
There is basic support for autotools, cmake and bare configure scripts.
The cmake support is a little hacky since cmake doesn't really have a
concise help option that lists user-defined knobs (without actually
running through the configure process), however that being a design
feature of cmake there's not much I can think of to do about that at
the moment.
(From OE-Core rev: 0e5d84d9705091b338000ef02720cfa090f76888)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we run the tasks required to extract the source for a recipe (e.g.
within "devtool modify" or "devtool extract") if one of those tasks
fails you get a bb.build.FuncFailed exception; handle this properly so
you don't see a traceback.
(From OE-Core rev: 95d8631b3bdf216001e57f48277535c65a4cc49e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a recipe generated by "devtool add" has been modified since then when
you run "devtool reset", it will be moved into the "attic" subdirectory
of the workspace in case those modifications need to be preserved. It
seems natural that if those modifications were worth preserving we
should warn the user if such a file exists when they run "devtool add"
to create the same recipe again, so they can pick up where they left off
if they want to.
(From OE-Core rev: 0a39b907ff997c3a62c92ab22325c726b612de5b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Provide an option to devtool build-image to specify the list of packages
instead of taking the list of packages produced by recipes in the
workspace. Sometimes you don't want all of these packages; other times
you want to add more.
This is the most immediate fix for [YOCTO #8855], though it is a little
crude so I would like to provide better means of customising the image
contents later.
(From OE-Core rev: b3a44951a74fe58714b72e71a7a558b67a71e1e3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
standard.py is getting a bit large; move the "utility" commands to
another module.
(From OE-Core rev: 5089b93f5b341dc28c343f7afe15efda2081ed36)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes you don't want to build an entire project, just a subdirectory
of it; add a --src-subdir option to make that easier. (We still look for
a single subdirectory in what gets unpacked, e.g. what you might find
within a tarball, so whatever you specify with this option is added onto
the end of that.)
(From OE-Core rev: 59682d78f95732e014f78f13e0a05f843860d9bb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add the ability to install additional pre-built items (from shared
state) into the extensible SDK. This can already be done implicitly by
adding something to DEPENDS within a recipe you're working on and then
running "devtool build", but it's useful to be able to explicitly
install things particularly if you're using the extensible SDK as a
traditional toolchain.
Note that for this command to be useful you need to have SSTATE_MIRRORS
set in your SDK configuration, and that mirror needs to be populated
with sstate artifacts for recipes you wish to be able to install.
(From OE-Core rev: 3474a42954908d1688fd3a6cb600eed315b27833)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Make the following improvements to the SDK update process:
* Use a manifest file with sha256sums to track files other than sstate
and metadata that we need to update - e.g. conf files. This allows us
to handle where files such as auto.conf may or may not be present,
as well as the configuration changing without affecting task signatures
- we still want the config files copied in that case rather than it
saying nothing needs to be done.
* Write the SSTATE_MIRRORS_append to site.conf rather than local.conf
so that local.conf remains static (since we don't want to trigger an
update every time). Also, If there is an SSTATE_MIRRORS value already
set in the configuration we can skip this and assume it contains the
needed packages.
* Allow the update process to be run in any directory, don't assume
we're already at the base of the SDK
* Where practical, fetch remote files into a temporary location and
then move them to the desired location at the end, to avoid a
failed update leaving the SDK in a broken state.
* Update all installed do_populate_sysroot / do_packagedata tasks
instead of using the SDK targets. This ensures any item installed
through dependencies after installation (e.g. when running
"devtool build") won't go stale.
(From OE-Core rev: 3d35631121f0e030bc8151f5c23d84008d06f44b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Use tempfile.mkdtemp() instead of hardcoding temp dir
* Set a variable early for the temp locked sigs file and use that
everywhere
* Delete the temp dir at the end
(From OE-Core rev: bad5d1a8c047a8118d30d9fa708b021d1599e0dc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool build, you need to have the pkgdata written out at
the end, so that if what you're adding is a library and the next thing
you add is something that depends on that library, the necessary
information to map the dependency back to the recipe is present. In
practical terms all this means is we need do_packagedata to run in
addition to do_populate_sysroot.
This does mean that do_package needs to run which wasn't running before,
and that means that the few package QA tests that run within do_package
such as installed-vs-shipped will now be run. This may be a bit
bothersome, and prompted a fix for one of our oe-selftest tests as a
result, but I don't see an easy way around it. Ultimately if you care
about using the recipe in an image you'll need to fix any such errors
anyway.
Fixes [YOCTO #8887].
(From OE-Core rev: 6579c7120ee5a541427ff5b6b07f838d52f9fe7c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a variable SDK_INCLUDE_PKGDATA which you can set to "1" to include
pkgdata for all recipes in the world target. There are a couple of uses
for this:
1) If you use "devtool add" to add a recipe that builds something which
depends on anything in world, the dependency can then be correctly
mapped to the recipe providing it and that recipe can be added to
DEPENDS, since we have the pkg-config and shared library dependency
data within pkgdata.
2) You'll be able to search for these recipes and any files they
package for the target with "devtool search" since that also uses
pkgdata
This of course assumes you've tailored world through EXCLUDE_FROM_WORLD
to only include recipes you'd want built in your distro, but I think
that's a reasonable assumption; failing that there is a
WORLD_PKGDATA_EXCLUDE variable that you can set to exclude any recipes
you don't want.
Note that this patch relies on functionality implemented in a recent
BitBake patch and will not work without it.
Implements [YOCTO #8600].
(From OE-Core rev: 67149ea097d6fab7496b43e85a40853f40bd527e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rather than horrible workarounds, use the new --setscene-only option
of bitbake to pre-populate the SDK structures.
(From OE-Core rev: 38237b7ac53c416f85c4a70a61acafc3404c8b5f)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's logical that you would want to build BBCLASSEXTENDed items
separately through devtool build, so simply allow that - we're just
passing the name verbatim to bitbake, so all it means is adjusting the
validation.
(From OE-Core rev: 25dc5ac42c9da53c01416e7fdcc819d729281133)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the recipe file itself was created in the workspace, and it uses
BBCLASSEXTEND (e.g. through devtool add --also-native), then we need to
clean the other variants as well.
(From OE-Core rev: e1bf6a30679a83d4dbcf37276204f639541e95f9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We're doing this in a couple of places, let's just find the recipe file
if it exists within the workspace (which it will if it's been added
through "devtool add") when we read in the workspace.
(From OE-Core rev: 81cf5580993c99050e3f4d6d891bc67534721487)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes you need to build a variant of a recipe for the build
host as well as for the target (i.e. BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"); add a
--also-native command line option to "recipetool create" that enables
this and plumb it through from an identical option for "devtool add".
(We could conceivably do the same for nativesdk, but I felt it might be
confusing within the context of the extensible SDK, where nativesdk
isn't really relevant to the user.)
(From OE-Core rev: f3bea83db173cce921a9a30f04e88b7e3ed98854)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We need to run the clean for all recipes that are being reset before we
start deleting things from the workspace; if we don't, recipes providing
dependencies may be missing when we come to clean a recipe later (since
we don't and couldn't practically reset them in dependency order). This
also improves performance since we have the startup startup time for the
clean just once rather than for every recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: c10a2de75a99410eb5338dd6da0e0b0e32bae6f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For debugging purposes it's useful to be able to skip the preparation
step so you can inspect what the state of the build system is first.
(From OE-Core rev: 0bba4b5afd2ce2c3a79445eee886979a77f1a4d8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Running "raise" with no arguments here is invalid, we're not in
exception handling context. Rather than also adding code to catch the
exception I just moved the check out to the parent function from which
we can just exit.
(From OE-Core rev: 0164dc66467739b357ab22bf9b8c0845f3eff4a4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Clone the correct path - we need .git on the end
* Pull from the specified path instead of expecting a remote to be set
* up in the repo already (it isn't by default)
(From OE-Core rev: 1a60ee8bd21e156022c928f12bb296ab5caaa766)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We read the updateserver setting from the config file but we never
actually used that value - the code then went on to use only the value
supplied on the command line.
Fix courtesy of Dmitry Rozhkov <dmitry.rozhkov@intel.com>
(From OE-Core rev: 1c85237803038fba539d5b03bf4de39d99380684)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Copied layers with 'cp -a' instead of calling shutil.copytree as
copytree fails to copy broken symlinks.
More pythonic fix would be to use copytree with 'ignore' parameter,
but this could slow down copying complex directory structures.
[YOCTO #8825]
(From OE-Core rev: e5b841420b9fdd33829f7665a62cd06a3017f7e6)
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Much of this was copy/pasted from the extract subcommand code; make it
specific to sync.
(From OE-Core rev: 08ca966dd48db881d8bfb7d7fa0aba49f1f7cffe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We deliberately leave the source tree alone when resetting in case it
contains any work in progress belonging to the user; tell them that
we're doing this so they aren't surprised about it still existing later
on.
(From OE-Core rev: 1c616802ba2cfb37f8403f1dc6cf91ce3bd99ac2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a recipe in the workspace actually exists as a file within the
workspace (e.g. after doing "devtool add" or "devtool upgrade") then
show the path to the recipe file on the status line for the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 29833828a90c8433af3b231b50e99cd97edf19ff)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As per the changes to "devtool add", make the source tree path optional
and use the default path if none is specified.
(From OE-Core rev: 83707d1334fb094fd1877bcfd07a83866601048a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Having to specify -f is a little bit ugly when a URI is distinctive
enough to recognise amongst the other positional parameters, so take it
as an optional positional parameter. -f/--fetch is still supported, but
deprecated.
(From OE-Core rev: aedfc5a5db1c4b2b80a36147c9a13b31764d91dd)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
recipetool create now has all the logic in it for auto-detecting the
name and version, and using those in the file name - so we can make the
name an optional parameter for devtool add and we pick up the file name
that recipetool has used after the fact.
(From OE-Core rev: 70ab08146e930f1fc55fdf5726a87303e20bd60f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Assuming we're fetching source remotely (from a URI) we can default the
source tree that will be extracted from it to a "sources" directory
under the workspace in order to save the user specifying it if they
don't have a preferred location.
(From OE-Core rev: ffdad964c7271972e4b067e4898bf7c338c25b68)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The bbappend already exists at this point, so we know what its path is -
there's no need to figure it out from scratch here.
(From OE-Core rev: c0754d672966901f22dff1bcd40bbd08d1219c7a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We're repeating this in a couple of places, so we might as well have a
function to do it.
(From OE-Core rev: 67a28109a1ee1383d1b17a8dafa4fe510948238b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a few clarifying words.
(From OE-Core rev: 2103fa9dc7faf2189c8b426b87fb9d421a9983ac)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add an "edit-recipe" subcommand that runs your default editor (as
specified by the EDITOR environment variable) on the specified recipe in
the workspace. Note that by default the recipe file itself must be in
the workspace - i.e. as a result of "devtool add" or "devtool upgrade";
however there is a -a/--any-recipe option to override this.
(From OE-Core rev: dbfe8fa2e86c2bb50bef47c389017cdf93543321)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the SDK update server hasn't been set in the config (when building
the extensible SDK this would be set via SDK_UPDATE_URL) and it wasn't
specified on the command line then we were failing with a traceback
because we didn't pass the default value properly - None is interpreted
as no default, meaning raise an exception if no such option exists.
Additionally we don't need the try...except anymore either because with
a proper default value, NoSectionError is caught as well.
(From OE-Core rev: 9763c1b83362f8445ed6dff2804dd7d282861f79)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add 'do_kernel_configme' and 'do_kernel_configcheck' to
SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS of kernel packages. These tasks should not be run
because kernel meta in the srctree is not necessarily up-to-date or
even present which causes build failures and/or invalid kernel config.
Especially so because 'do_patch' which is a dependency of
'do_kernel_configme' is not being run.
We now store .config in the srctree and 'do_configure' task is able to
run successfully.
(From OE-Core rev: 7ce4c18a4ba1ebcb9f46e652a881ace1f21d2292)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This makes the correct kernel config to be used when building kernel
from srctree (extrernalsrc). If no kernel config is present in the
builddir 'do_configure' task copies .config from the srctree.
(From OE-Core rev: 3b516332e038a587685f6e0c14a7f04990bdd6cc)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use bb.utils.edit_metadata() to replace some of the logic in this
function; this avoids us effectively having two implementations of the
same thing. In the process fix the following issues:
* Insert values before any leading comments for the next variable
instead of after them
* Insert overridden variables (e.g. RDEPENDS_${PN}) in the correct place
* Properly handle replacing varflag settings (e.g. SRC_URI[md5sum])
(From OE-Core rev: 0f81b83fc5fd908efa7f6b837137830ca65f6ed6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Make some minor clarifications to help text
* Drop ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter and just put the defaults in the
text itself where needed (because otherwise you get defaults shown for
store_true options which is somewhat confusing).
(From OE-Core rev: a90ffea30c4578fd6acda2c5945b816ad33b13f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Enable access to the configuration object in register_commands() so that
we can read configuration values there; this allows us to show the
task that will be run in the command line help for the build subcommand.
(From OE-Core rev: 142d006de3235a034839ef7bbe147c56fc7af04a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use a bbappend file to set PARALLEL_MAKE instead of a postfile; this
is a bit neater and only affects the specified recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: b5bafc845892ac39f85f3642b120fb7b785a3d58)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is just belt-and-braces but we ought to use try..finally in this
kind of situation, so just do it.
(From OE-Core rev: a30b407474d4eb6620f1ec549b54187ebbaff008)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Print the SUMMARY value for each matched item assuming it's not the
default.
(From OE-Core rev: 596dee8882ebddb45a6cce9f12aa919107106156)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This function is no longer required to be defined for a plugin, so drop
it where it's a no-op.
(From OE-Core rev: 49716a5e27e704598321bd6c82275b16afc444aa)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rather than reconstructing the output path for packages, use the proper
variable.
(From OE-Core rev: 06d47777ed1650c479fadf98388f9a3a1f1f9eda)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For subcommands that don't actually involve the workspace, don't
auto-create the workspace.
(From OE-Core rev: 90cba7992bc1d227e242666cd486414bd4a45f7e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're upgrading a git recipe to a revision on a release branch
that's different to the branch for the current revision, then you'll
need to update the branch parameter in SRC_URI, so add a --srcbranch/-B
command-line parameter to let you do that easily. It handles both when
the branch is stated verbatim in the recipe, and when a reference to
another variable is used (a common convention is to use a SRCBRANCH
variable for this, though the code doesn't care what variable is used
if any).
(From OE-Core rev: e49a66fd898dd44e54c77a838ebef3d983ed2a03)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're upgrading a recipe that fetches from git, and we've simply
fetched a tarball of the repo instead of directly from the upstream repo
(this can happen if you have PREMIRRORS set up as in poky with a core recipe,
e.g. kernelshark) then we won't have any new revisions, and the checkout
will fail with "fatal: reference is not a tree: <hash>". To avoid this,
do a "git fetch" before checking out the new revision.
(From OE-Core rev: c4daebf3fe797a8063dcbc2ab229be2fbedc8134)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're upgrading a git recipe the recipe file usually won't need
renaming; for some unknown reason we were throwing an error here which
isn't correct.
(From OE-Core rev: 656348dff9bc9dd1cafc8fff11e5e374e3667f0f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This code was clearly never tested. Fix the following issues:
* Actually set SRCREV if it's been specified
* Enable history tracking and reparse so that we handle if variables are
set in an inc file next to the recipe
* Use a more accurate check for PV being in the recipe which will work
if it's in an inc file next to the recipe
(From OE-Core rev: 8b8f04226ebf464fa61c05ca7af7c6cbda392339)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you did a "devtool add" followed by "devtool upgrade" and then did
a "devtool reset" on the recipe you upgraded, the first recipe would
also be deleted from the workspace - this was because we were
erroneously adding the entire "recipes" subdirectory and its contents to
be tracked for removal on reset. Remove the unnecessary call to
os.path.dirname() that caused this.
(From OE-Core rev: 65354e066f87df7d3138adceb22d6a05d1685904)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The external source of kernel has been patched during the
construction of git repository. Include the do_patch task in the
SRCTREECOVEREDTASKS.
(From OE-Core rev: 0731c5a9e98f7b7f6e5ada9bbb99acb3f5884516)
Signed-off-by: Tzu-Jung Lee <roylee17@currantlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The sync command is similar to the extract command, except it
fetches the sync'ed and patched branch to an existing git repository.
This enables users to keep track the upstream development while
maintaining their own local git repository at the same time.
(From OE-Core rev: e2fe4c99f1020a20b579832c4feafcd0e9bc2f75)
Signed-off-by: Tzu-Jung Lee <roylee17@currantlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For modify / extract / upgrade, if the specified "recipe" is not
actually a recipe but a virtual target such as virtual/kernel, map it
correctly to the actual recipe and make sure we use that name within the
workspace. Thanks to Chris Larson for reminding me this was still broken
and for a hint on how to fix it.
(From OE-Core rev: 1f7752282ffb47d2621030ddb2fa42a5e491d6d2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If recipe parsing fails we need to exit out instead of attempting to use
the data object that's set to None, which resulted in a traceback.
(From OE-Core rev: a46fb1a06be2df00a0bceb4e60ebdecb55b5974c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use "git cherry" against the original tag that we made when we extracted
the source in order to find the revisions that are definitely new. This
allows you to modify a commit in the middle of the series and then run
devtool update-recipe and not have the subsequent patches unnecessarily
modified.
Fixes [YOCTO #8388].
(From OE-Core rev: 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The name of the directory for local source files under srctree is
'oe-local-files', not 'local-files'. Fixes a bug that slipped through
in b7ab82485e4514e07ab8a76e554da27ddc92e6c0.
(From OE-Core rev: 68cbe684fe6d8fe3a44e47ed85837d09077df6d5)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Enable variable history tracking so that the variables are updated in
the correct file - i.e. in the file they are already defined.
[YOCTO #7715]
(From OE-Core rev: b54796d013c562972e962126400503085281b425)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This change makes it possible to have local files (non-remote SRC_URI
files, i.e. files that are located in the "recipe space") under the
srctree even if S!=WORKDIR. The files must be placed under the
'local-files' subdirectory.
Complements the previous patch that imports local files into srctree.
[YOCTO #7602]
(From OE-Core rev: b7ab82485e4514e07ab8a76e554da27ddc92e6c0)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* extract: Copy all local source files (i.e. non-compressed/non-arcived
SRC_URI files that have file:// URI prefix) - excluding patches - to
the srctree repository. The files will be placed in a subdirectory
called 'oe-local-files'. The oe-local-files directory is not committed
to the Git repository, but, marked to be ignored by a .gitignore file.
The developer can manually add and commit the files to Git if the
changes to them need to be tracked.
Before this patch, local source files (were copied (and committed) to
the srctree repository only in some special cases (basically when
S=WORKDIR) when doing devtool-extract. For most of the packages local
files were not copied at all.
* update-recipe: This patch causes the local files to be 'synced' from
the srctree (i.e. from the 'oe-local-files' subdirectory) to the
layer. Being 'synced' means that in addition to copying modified
files over the original sources, devtool will also handle removing and
adding local source files and updating the recipe accordingly. We
don't want to create patches against the local source files but rather
update them directly. Thus, 'oe-local-file' directory is ignored in
patch generation when doing update-recipe, even if committed to Git.
This functionality is only enabled if the 'oe-local-files' directory
is present in srctree.
[YOCTO #7602]
(From OE-Core rev: a3bb5bd25b72bd1bcc156dabd0ffa2d9184bb160)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Helper function for replacing a pattern like:
target_dir = os.path.dirname(target)
bb.utils.mkdirhier(target_dir)
shutil.move(source, target)
(From OE-Core rev: c09e5b11225a673534594c3642ceead3eb5653a3)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Implement new function that handles patch file generation. The new
function also does the discovery of new, updated and deleted patches.
(From OE-Core rev: 183812e60e1dce09c77b41a5a927ab7fb6fdcf9d)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When adding multiple new patches append them to SRC_URI in correct order
so that they apply correctly.
(From OE-Core rev: 819680092c1b49c16f4ab01d135d44311a9dacca)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We only need the base configuration to get the variable values we want
to get here, there's no need to parse recipes / load the cache.
(From OE-Core rev: 84172ff7b325f081dba6430fd27f12e3745838b5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Do not change change current working directory permanently, but, only
for the duration of tinfoil initialization instead. The previous fix
caused very unintuitive behavior where using relative paths were solved
with respect to the builddir instead of the current working directory.
E.g. calling "devtool extract zlib ./zlib" would always create create
srctree in ${TOPDIR}/zlib, independent of the users cwd.
(From OE-Core rev: 4c7f159b0e17a0475a4a4e9dc4dd012e3d2e6a1f)
(From OE-Core rev: 05060699e63cd25d089e83e9aa56c11d5baa8fd8)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Adds a subcommand to search to find the target recipe name providing
some file or capability. This is implemented by searching on recipe
name, package name, description, package contents (file names), and
runtime file provides. For example:
$ devtool search libGL
mesa
$ devtool search X11
xextproto
libxxf86vm
xf86driproto
xf86vidmodeproto
libxfixes
xproto
libx11
...
$ devtool search /bin/sed
busybox
sed
This is particularly useful within the extensible SDK but is also made
available in devtool alongside the build system.
Note of course that because this searches pkgdata, useful results depend
upon do_packagedata(_setscene) having executed for the recipe being
searched for.
(From OE-Core rev: 48cbde0ea77ed20126eceba5feb37c42a9229500)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We ship the runqemu script and if we build QEMU itself within the
extensible SDK, then it would be nice to be able to run it. This is a
very thin wrapper around runqemu, supplying the machine and image name
so the user doesn't need to. (This subcommand is only available within
the extensible SDK since it only really makes sense there where it is
otherwise hard to run runqemu directly.)
Implements [YOCTO #6657].
(From OE-Core rev: abca7a0cac7068ffe6a6b873d0842f804388b621)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a means of creating recipes for package files or archives that
contain a directory structure to be installed verbatim, for example an
rpm file. (We mostly just re-use bin_package here and skip some of the
normal build system checks.) This support is available in "recipetool
create" and "devtool add" which wraps the former.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e0a6b2e6f16185f8032d36b77d40802bc388987)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that this bbappend ought to just
be deleted at the end of the build. This keeps things simple; you never
have to remember to delete any files to get back to where you were
before with the image. This means we can also drop the slightly awkward
message reminding the user how to do that. I've also updated the test to
look at the image manifest to determine if the command has worked
instead of looking for the (now deleted) bbappend.
(From OE-Core rev: f6b90bceaedf9bad3d111e6ca1fa79e59f472c73)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Make image optional for the extensible SDK (auto-determine it based on
the targets the SDK was built for)
* Check that specified recipe is in fact an image
(From OE-Core rev: 8884875aacfedc69cc72898684e391e69fea00ba)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user is running "devtool build-image" within the extensible SDK
then they probably won't know where to find the resulting output files,
so we should tell them explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: 9baf9fd7a53142a98c7f1cd49c7b001760af51f9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We build recipes and include packages into the image, adjust the
terminology used in code and messages accordingly. Also fix a few typos.
(From OE-Core rev: 866f6e2de20b7022803e53c4de3ff341521b4db5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we end up printing a message about the build directory being the same
as the source, we should print that first and then print the message
about the recipe file possibly needing to be edited to the end so that
it has slightly more impact.
(From OE-Core rev: 97398d14c444fe2408dd6101ef46a0a406924bb5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the fetched source isn't already a git repository, initialise it as
one and then branch and tag, just as we do with "devtool modify". This
makes it easier to make changes, commit them and then use the
"devtool update-recipe" command to turn those commits into patches
on the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 2dd865086c37c9eff63c6d0bbfa9f2e909f9fffe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Some recipes don't extract any source (for example, opkg-keyrings). We
were producing a traceback in this case because we weren't checking if
the directory existed.
(From OE-Core rev: 087ca0c644aad19e6e7d3921f99f3056471deb65)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Recipes that use work-shared (such as libgcc) are capable of unpacking
the source, but it doesn't necessarily unpack to ${WORKDIR}/${BP}. Use
the last part of the actual S value instead which is more likely to
work.
(From OE-Core rev: 0bab8086fdef93b88d5ec6b88b07ccc921dd786f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you try to use "devtool modify -x" or "devtool extract" on a recipe
where do_unpack has been set as noexec (e.g. glibc-locale), then we get
an error because the expected source wasn't ever unpacked. Do a check up
front for noexec being set on do_unpack and error out with a reasonable
message if that's the case.
(From OE-Core rev: 39a93c85e798e72edd6ab3c05f8adbb1a97e893e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we were adding a recipe for software that would typically be built
in the same directory as the source, we were always using a separate
build directory unless the user explicitly specified not to, leading to
errors for software that doesn't expect to be built that way (such as
Python modules using distutils). Split out the code that makes this
determination automatically from the "devtool modify" and "devtool
upgrade" code and re-use that here so the behaviour is consistent.
(From OE-Core rev: 320585b7ff6340df0b0dbc63f95ed3ca8fc3a993)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These functions ostensibly allowed parsing a recipe without bbappends
but this clearly hadn't been tested because a variable was unassigned in
both of them in that case.
(From OE-Core rev: d2bb9f08303bb120e811c03af2f5339e8f262cfa)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes, particularly if you extracted the source to /tmp which is on
tmpfs, the external source tree that is being pointed to may no longer
exist when you come to run "devtool build" or "devtool update-recipe"
etc. Make all of the commands that need to check for a recipe being in
the workspace call a single function and have that function additionally
check the source tree still exists where appropriate.
(From OE-Core rev: 0c3f289576a2ab35b1d1d8854d6763553cc3bf09)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is not actually used for anything - I thought that we would need to
use it within devtool to set global configuration, but we're able to do
everything we need within the bbappends it creates, which also saves on
parse time. If we're not going to use work-config.inc let's just drop it
completely.
(From OE-Core rev: 84a1f82acd3b6ebb3c073aae6b996d2203dad2ce)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Markus Lehtonen
Paul Eggleton
Richard Purdie
Ed Bartosh
Tzu-Jung Lee