We had a logic inversion that meant we where dropping quite a
significant number of events on the floor.... Fixed!
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
It's unlikely that someone wants to close the progress dialog
yet leave the UI (and BitBake process) running, so hook up
the progress dialogs delete-event to exit gtk.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
The recent change to Queue up events before the UI is spawned (in
26eda93337) broke the xmlrpc server because the
uievent implementation of BBUIEventQueue expects pickled strings for its
queue_event() method.
This is because the RPC exposed event.send() method must accept pickled
strings, but for xmlrpc event.send() is just mapped to queue_event().
Work around this by adding a send_event method which unpickles strings and
hands them off to queue_event() which can then be used for the remapping.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
This cleans up the knotty console messages to be a lot quieter and cleaning,
in keeping with the expectations of most users.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The various alternative UIs have been updated to once again be functional
with the latest bitbake internals. Each of the UIs still have much room for
functional improvement.
In particular, they have been updated to:
- interact with the new process based server
- handle the current set of events and notifications fired from the server
and its associated subsystems
(Bitbake rev: b947e7aa405966262c0614cae02e7978ec637095)
Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <robert@erafx.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Without sorting, it's very difficult to find the information you're
looking for. Now, the lists are all sorted alphabetically for easy
viewing.
(Bitbake rev: 80e3d3a130b9dee72c11c6946bb5ff7705111d7c)
Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <robert@erafx.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
(Bitbake rev: bdd7813d8eecf7b6b636322e748ca6bf69118513)
Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <robert@erafx.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
- Moved the logic for comparing revisions from cooker into command
- Removed 'Cooker' from the event names
- Renamed the 'ExitCode' event into CommandExit, and changed CommandFailed to
be a subclass of CommandExit
(Bitbake rev: c51ed5d7a9971fad6019dac6c35a71b8a54ab16a)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
As these may run the UI in a blocking fashion and then return the exit code,
'init' was an inappropriate name, and 'main' is more appropriate.
(Bitbake rev: 4d081a0ed759bd526ab01849d650bd9e8d80ddd1)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Rather than updating the progress bar based on the recipe being processed
(whether cached or parsed), consider only parsed recipes. This reduces the
instability in progress rate introduced by the cached entries, and allows the
ETA to be resurrected and be a bit more useful.
(Bitbake rev: 618480f7739f6ae846f67a57bee5a78efb37839d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Currently, the progress bar is an indication of the processing of our recipes,
which includes loading the cache file, then for each recipe, either adding the
existing cached information to the CacheData or parsing the recipe from disk.
These tasks clearly take different amounts of time, so the ETA is unreliable
today. We'll resurrect this functionality after we revamp the progress
handling, fully incorporating the load of the cache file.
(Bitbake rev: 80867372dcbef91ebaf7d77a77ca871741dd3f74)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This version uses a thread rather than a process, to avoid problems with
waitpid handling. This gives slightly less overall build time reduction than
the separate process for it did (this reduces a -c compile coreutils-native by
about 3 seconds, while the process reduced it by 7 seconds), however this time
is quite insignificant relative to a typical build.
The biggest issue with non-backgrounded syncing is the perceived delay before
work begins, and this resolves that without breaking anything, or so it seems.
(Bitbake rev: 5ab6c5c7b007b8c77c751582141afc07c183d672)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This kills firing of Msg* events in favor of just passing along LogRecord
objects. These objects hold more than just level and message, but can also
have exception information, so the UI can decide what to do with that.
As an aside, when using the 'none' server, this results in the log messages in
the server being displayed directly via the logging module and the UI's
handler, rather than going through the server's event queue. As a result of
doing it this way, we have to override the event handlers of the base logger
when spawning a worker process, to ensure they log via events rather than
directly.
(Bitbake rev: c23c015cf8af1868faf293b19b80a5faf7e736a5)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Stupdi typo/thinko from me had depexp exiting once recipes had parsed
as I'd used a return the while loop where I'd meant a continue...
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Construct a ProgressBar and pass it to the RunningBuild.handle_event() so
that goggle users are notified of metadata parsing progress.
UI's with status make users less nervous
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
It seems likely that the user would want to view the most recently emitted
messages so this patch sets the message dislay treeview to scroll to any
newly added rows.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
ProgressBar will be useful in other UI elements so make it it's own class.
Make ProgressBar a subclass of gtk.Dialog, rather than gtk.Window, so that we
can suggest the window manager parent the ProgressBar to the widget passed at
as parent.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Due to some recent change *somewhere* we need to explicitly look at the
name attribute on the instances class, rather than the name attribute of
the instance.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Move the test for ignored messages to the start of the message handling loop to
avoid doing work for messages which are only going to be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
Some of the events we where trying to look for have had their class names
changed, fix these references.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
..to make copy and paste of the logfile easier.
(Bitbake rev: 446cc0cebd4daff7f849717f4cb89ac1b4c6b755)
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Richard Purdie
Joshua Lock
Richard Purdie
Bob Foerster
Chris Larson
Bob Foerster
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer