The path to where to install and find the sysroot components is used
in many places. This warrants it to get its own variable.
(From OE-Core rev: 70a84b525470f72339568409daf84845904e4cab)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
sstates are cleaned when ruining test_devtool_virtual_kernel_modify to
have a clean environment but this is affecting eSDK test that are
dependent of those sstates, hence “cleansstate” is replaced for
“clean”.
[YOCTO #11300]
(From OE-Core rev: 182fdb97ed6c11c7b55fdb99773da6f72c9828b3)
Signed-off-by: Jose Perez Carranza <jose.perez.carranza@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The recipe being tested (devtoo-test-patch-gz) by devtool has dependencies (at
least libxres and virtual/libx11) that cannot be built with poky-tiny distro so
skip the test for this particular policy.
[YOCTO #10891]
(From OE-Core rev: 03751783cb063bc6a57cd19357bc1016bfa2a814)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To generalize the unit test for other kernel providers, use virtual/kernel instead
of linux-yocto, allowing to run the selftest on non-poky distros, i.e. poky-tiny.
(From OE-Core rev: 087e1204fb27e2952f16c2e4761f5993b7722732)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* devtool: oeqa.selftest.devtool.DevtoolTests is taking 4 or more hours on the
autobuilder because the cleanall call deletes the tarball of the kernel
source, forcing a large clone which is especially long on an NFS mount.
The cleanall invocation isn't really required here and switching to clean
instead should avoid hours of re-cloning the same repository each time we
run oe-selftest on the autobuilder.
* buildoptions: We only need to ensure the first image isn't an incremental
image, clean will suffice here.
* runtime-test: no need to clean up the artefacts generated during the test,
let's leave that to a higher level process rather than using the cleanall
hammer.
(From OE-Core rev: 9c948d3de08f158387e08a17cdc0cedc7d26bb54)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Not sure why this cleanup is disabled but it clearly should be running
so enable it.
(From OE-Core rev: 83867079182d8b9e981935da2b254947a89097bb)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The purpose of this test case is to verify that
devtool modify works correctly when building
the kernel.
[YOCTO #10817]
(From OE-Core rev: 0fa3d331df7d5a5fbd8431febc75efe6bcc6f96b)
Signed-off-by: Jose Perez Carranza <jose.perez.carranza@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
get_bb_var calls bitbake every time it is used and every call
would take about 7 seconds. There are tests that calls get_bb_var
several times when they can use get_bb_vars. Also there are tests
that calls it to fetch the same variable over and over again.
This will optimize the use of get_bb_var and get_bb_vars for a
little speed up in the tests.
[YOCTO #11037]
(From OE-Core rev: e53f86ba8aeb6d2e9eb259329001d27d62401072)
Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently selftest doesn't use sstates because some tests
clean sstate cache; using sstates would give a performance
boost instead of building everything from scratch.
With this sstates are not corrupted using different methods
depending on tests:
devtool: These tests needed to delete the cache so SSTATE_DIR
as SSTATE_MIRRORS and set a temporal SSTATE_DIR.
sstatetests: This module already used a temporal SSTATE_DIR, so
just set up the SSTATE_MIRRORS.
Rest: Removed cleansstate, some of them required to force a
certain task, others were just removed or changed for another
task.
[YOCTO #10929]
(From OE-Core rev: 62c61087a10cc3b26fbff32c9e2efd1704a39724)
Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There is no common sysroot any more so add the libusb dependency using DEPENDS
and check for the output in the sysroot output directory so the tests
work with recipe specific sysroots.
(From OE-Core rev: ff30b833a423d300ec2b81bf80ef6733a6d8039b)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The -C option isn't available in versions of git older than 1.8.5,
and officially we only require git 1.8.3.1 or newer (and the latter is
the version you'll find on CentOS 7, so the test fails there). In any
case we can simply specify the working directory to runCmd() so just
do that instead.
(From OE-Core rev: ce5c7075d530c0950f2feed35f95fbcd9f50721f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The modify testcase had to be updated as it started failing when mdadm was
upgraded due to hardcoding version numbers in the test. I then noticed how
inefficient the test was and mostly rewrote it.
Start by changing the minor modification to change "Linux Software RAID" (the
subtitle of the man page) to "antique pin sardine" (a nonsense phrase that is
unlikely to appear upstream), and neaten the logic.
Start by not removing sstate at the beginning of the test. To ensure builds
happen we can use -f and -C, and iterating the sstate cache is time consuming.
Don't bitbake mdadm repeatedly until it stabilizes, we can start with bitbake -C
unpack to ensure that a full build is done from scratch.
os.path.join has the interesting quirk that join(/foo, /bar) results in /bar, so
use oe.path.join instead of working around that manually.
Don't repeatedly call get_bb_var(), each call results in a call to bitbake.
These changes reduce the runtime of the test from over 600 seconds to around 160
seconds on my machine.
(From OE-Core rev: fc97963bc61bf16112859fe1d7e460a13d34baca)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The recipes being replaced are not compatible with all distros, so
use mraa and virtual/make for some checks.
(From OE-Core rev: bb32b232d686d1c057dede6f61ed4051b0088673)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Test both for S == B and S != B.
(From OE-Core rev: 3b46c1ac203717d85a1e2e8da067a69f066b7037)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <olani@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The new mtd-utils (version 2.0) has been autotooled so the test needs to touch
Makefile.am instead of Makefile.
(From OE-Core rev: acce512a0b85853b5acf2ef07e4163a3b4f33a98)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add code to verify that not only does a change trigger a build, but so
does reverting that change.
Reverting a change in a devtool managed git repo may cause the current
checksum to match the checksum of a previous build, which will cause
bitbake to skip builds that are needed.
(From OE-Core rev: 58a31d8dd7293f14c70e56ec9639c420d15e7dfc)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Check that man .in file actually gets modified, since sed -i doesn't
fail if it it doesn't
* Use a variable for man file path
(From OE-Core rev: 9ad36e945fa5b03726f78ba99e823eade8daa710)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Test that devtool plugins are loaded in a well defined order.
(From OE-Core rev: 0de81f0c8b29d8b442b3d099c3bec3fd345b6bfe)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
(From OE-Core rev: 857c06d6a1d161bf5a01311d07758bd4241929a3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a file:// entry in SRC_URI with a subdir= parameter that
makes it extract into the source tree, then when you update that file in
oe-local-files and run devtool update-recipe then you want the original
file to be updated. This was made to work by OE-Core commit
9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309 together with
31f1bbad248c36a8c86dde4ff57ce42efc664082, however until now there was no
oe-selftest test to verify it.
Note that in order to succeed this test also requires the fix
"lib/oe/recipeutils: ignore archives by default in
get_recipe_local_files()" since the test recipe uses a local tarball.
(From OE-Core rev: 936eba3e1059d1dcd5e58c1ce76870fff7b11b3c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
(From OE-Core rev: e47d21624dfec6f71742b837e91da553f18a28c5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a test to ensure devtool update-recipe works properly on recipes
that contain only local files (since the other tests we have didn't test
that).
Relates to [YOCTO #10563].
(From OE-Core rev: bdc844b3f0c3fbddcd3523095899a5bd29797704)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
(From OE-Core rev: 9303d8055c45a0f6af295d70a6f6a8b9d8d8a7c9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a variable is being set in the recipe when we've explicitly passed
None as the value to _test_recipe_contents() indicating that it
shouldn't be set at all, then we should be printing out the variable
name in the assertion message but it seems like I forgot to do a
substitution. Also include the value for informational purposes.
(From OE-Core rev: 0dafcb158003fb13f82c266f607d9967fca321db)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
recipetool sets the LICENSE value based on licenses detected from the
source tree. If there are multiple licenses then they were being
separated by spaces, but this isn't actually legal formatting and if
you're using "devtool add" you get a warning printed when devtool
parses the recipe internally.
Earlier I had made a conscious decision to do it this way since it's up
to the user to figure out whether the multiple licenses should all apply
(in which case they'd be separated with &) or if there is a choice of
license (in which case | is the correct separator). However, I've come
to the conclusion that we can just default to & and then the ugly
warning goes away, and it's the safest alternative of the two (and most
likely to be correct, since it's more common to have a codebase which is
made up of code with different licenses, i.e. all of them apply to the
combined work).
I've tweaked the comment that we add to the recipe to explicitly state
that we've used & and that the user needs to change that if that's not
accurate.
Fixes [YOCTO #10413].
(From OE-Core rev: ecac6aee8cf3313350b58c21012bcd67cfb915e4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
OE-Core commit d3057cba0b01484712fcee3c52373c143608a436 fixed handling
of wildcard bbappends, which means that this test's expectations about
the bbappend file name are no longer met. devtool finish is meant to use
wildcard bbappends so fix the test accordingly.
(From OE-Core rev: 21603566e4a2e709dcb4a940b49d870c91c822be)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
(From OE-Core rev: fa550fcb9333d59b28fc0e4aebde888831410f5c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Current parsing was picking wrong targets, leading to the following problem:
AssertionError: Command 'bitbake Parsing recipes..done. -e' returned non-zero exit status 1:
(From OE-Core rev: eaf83a58825d91c7445835b27d843da7532c208b)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sets are safer when comparing internal elements and positions are not
important. This commit avoid errors observed on python3 builds as reported
on the below bugzilla entry.
[YOCTO #9661]
(From OE-Core rev: f6df164d09a4d4cf58977bf6cc0bc4f4bc71183a)
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
python3 standardises its use of iteration operations. Update
the code to match the for python3 requires.
(From OE-Core rev: 2476bdcbef591e951d11d57d53f1315848758571)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If fetching source from a git repository, typically within OpenEmbedded
we encourage setting SRCREV to a fixed revision, so change to do that by
default and add a -a/--autorev option to use "${AUTOREV}" instead.
(From OE-Core rev: 000480c42797dd2f03ebc3bc6d1dabfc6a7b75f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that make/remake needs a PREFERRED_PROVIDER, we need to set this
correctly during tests.
(From OE-Core rev: 1a41953331f42d69c0201dcfcbb7d8dc12422fde)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we add from a fetched URL we are supposed to turn the resulting
source tree into a git repository (if it isn't already one). However, we
were using the older deprecated option name here instead of the
positional argument, so "devtool add -f <url>" resulted in the repo
being created but "devtool add <url>" didn't, which was wrong.
Also update the oe-selftest tests to check that this worked.
(From OE-Core rev: a7b6b1f8cc1c096724f794ac9dee312b0f771f66)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is not the correct way to handle this - it significantly increases
the time taken to run oe-selftest anywhere MACHINE is set to some other
value (for example "qemux86-64"), because all of the artifacts for
qemux86 need to then be built as well when running the test. If we need
to skip these tests on non-QEMU machines, the devtool test already
demonstrates how to do that.
This reverts commit 169e1eaa4fc5ed03e2307b68686a7f5b1db37a36.
(From OE-Core rev: f60da6d5be5469ed5b834759c3822471f81fcdd2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a test for devtool upgrade with a recipe pointing to a git
repository, since this uses several different code paths.
(From OE-Core rev: d3ec74ff4db248ea11a568d5214708d6a1757012)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Use a more real-world test of a recipe pointing to a remote file
* The cleanup tracking / teardown commands need to be added towards the
top, or they won't have the desired effect of cleaning up if the test
fails.
* Check that a versioned subdirectory gets renamed to match the new
version
* Ensure the recipe contents gets changed as we expect it to
* Check that the recipe directory is deleted by devtool reset at the end
(From OE-Core rev: d0ae258e963f9bafffc4ca43c87497d27e57c127)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a test so we validate the following recently implemented/fixed
aspects of "devtool add":
* Adding from a local directory with no name specified
* Auto-detecting the name and version from autoconf files
* Setting SRC_URI and S from the local git repo
* Showing the recipe file path in "devtool status" if it has been
created within the workspace
Incidentally also tests:
* LICENSE and LIC_FILES_CHKSUM detection (though just for this piece of
software)
* Extracting a dependency from autoconf (though just for this narrow
case since there's only one)
(From OE-Core rev: d991fe7f17861dc5c21f7eac30d8c912b4d5dbed)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's going to be more common for users not to have the prepared source
tree for a recipe already, so the default behaviour ought to be to
extract it for them from the recipe. Change the default to extract
(effectively making the -x option a no-op) and add a --no-extract/-n
option to disable it. Later we can look at trying to be smart and
reusing an existing source tree instead of erroring out if it exists;
for now this is just the default reversal.
(From OE-Core rev: 80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool build, you need to have the pkgdata written out at
the end, so that if what you're adding is a library and the next thing
you add is something that depends on that library, the necessary
information to map the dependency back to the recipe is present. In
practical terms all this means is we need do_packagedata to run in
addition to do_populate_sysroot.
This does mean that do_package needs to run which wasn't running before,
and that means that the few package QA tests that run within do_package
such as installed-vs-shipped will now be run. This may be a bit
bothersome, and prompted a fix for one of our oe-selftest tests as a
result, but I don't see an easy way around it. Ultimately if you care
about using the recipe in an image you'll need to fix any such errors
anyway.
Fixes [YOCTO #8887].
(From OE-Core rev: 6579c7120ee5a541427ff5b6b07f838d52f9fe7c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If Python is in the sysroot then this test can fail due to some
brokenness in libftdi's CMakeLists.txt file for its python bindings.
Just disable it in order to have the test work more reliably.
(From OE-Core rev: 3e53e675bba75eb949be97a8d372e0134f6df935)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
1391 for test_devtool_add_fetch_simple from devtool
1392 for test_recipetool_create_simple from recipetool
(From OE-Core rev: d6ee070127a08be98958bbb8b11c80bb64165dc7)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Istrate <daniel.alexandrux.istrate@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The devtool and recipetool tests do literal string comparisons, but for some
fields the ordering could be irrelevant and potentially non-deterministic. For
example, the recipetool_create_simple test started failing with:
AssertionError: 'GPLv2 Unknown' != 'Unknown GPLv2' : values for LICENSE do not match
The ordering of the LICENSE field isn't relevant. So, if the expected value is
a set(), split the string into a set too and compare those.
(From OE-Core rev: dab1b0ad42f08eb547732e854ba28a4cf0a23107)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It makes sense for tests that use runqemu to have MACHINE set as qemu.
This also avoid issues when running oe-selftest with --arch random/all
option.
(From OE-Core rev: 169e1eaa4fc5ed03e2307b68686a7f5b1db37a36)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Istrate <daniel.alexandrux.istrate@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
test_devtool_deploy_target is failing on the Yocto Project autobuilder
apparently when it attempts to cut out some fields from the list. It
doesn't fail here and I can't see what the problem lines are, so add a
check for lines with too few fields so we can get a look at them next
time it fails.
(From OE-Core rev: 2b19c74332c3899c84708946d749f88c4416cf73)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add an oe-selftest test case for the newly supported syntax with only
the remote URL specified (auto-detecting name and version).
(From OE-Core rev: 7c7df9f62fe15578af0420c63e320c317e058708)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Often the filename (e.g. source tarball) contains the name and version
of the software it contains.
(This isn't intended to be exhaustive, just to catch the common case.)
(From OE-Core rev: 944eacfb849ee69b41e12c9de4f264406281ac6a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Some build systems (notably autotools) support declaring the name and
version of the program being built; since we need those for the recipe
we can attempt to extract them. It's a little fuzzy as they are often
omitted or may not be appropriately formatted for our purposes, but it
does work on a reasonable number of software packages to be useful.
(From OE-Core rev: 3b3fd33190d89c09e62126eea0e45aa84fe5442e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Peter Kjellerstedt
Jose Perez Carranza
Leonardo Sandoval
Joshua Lock
Richard Purdie
Jose Perez Carranza
Mariano Lopez
Paul Eggleton
Ross Burton
Ola x Nilsson
Daniel Istrate
Ed Bartosh