Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Purdie 65f4b65410 Further cleanup of various poky references
(From OE-Core rev: fe73ea8c510877fe4e3c117985e8f3d0b79ddf1b)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-04-21 12:56:16 +01:00
Beth Flanagan 136ba6a3c4 Fixing type: license.bbclass
Munged a tab. Fixing

Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
2011-02-26 14:15:50 -08:00
Beth Flanagan d041ab31a1 Fixing my bad license parsing: license.bbclass
Fix to my bad license parsing. Also added the MIT generic license
files.

Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
2011-02-26 14:04:41 -08:00
Beth Flanagan 3c0522e944 [BUG:650] Fix LICENSE parsing: license.bblcass
LICENSE parsing was missing some cases. Fixed

Signed-off-by: Beth Flanagan <elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com>
2011-02-25 16:39:08 -08:00
Richard Purdie 9b2fd4b0fe license.bbclass: Add coverage by sstate code (also use cleandirs and dirs task attribures for directory handling)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-02-03 12:33:18 +00:00
Kevin Tian eb879e2ef8 license.bbclass: don't mark it as 'nostamp'
'nostamp' is normally used for some standalone tasks like clean, checkuri, etc.
It doesn't make sense to mark do_populate_lic as 'nostamp', which is depended
by do_package. No stamp file in the build dependency chain implicates that
do_package needs to be reinvoked and thus further do_package_write* stuff.

This together with another sstate bug fully confused recent master, that people
keep observing unnecessary do_package rebuilt with or without change. Below is
a short explanation for two behaviors we observed:

a) a fresh build, and then bitbake same target w/o any change. User will observe
one unnecessary rebuild and then later rebuild is fine:
    [1st rebuild]
    * do_populate_lic has no stamp, and thus do_package is thought not current
    * do_package_setscene is then invoked with stamp file created
    * then later do_package_write*** also are rebuilt
    [2nd and later rebuild]
    * do_populate_lic has no stamp, and thus do_package is thought not current
    * do_package_setscene has stamp file and thus no need to re-execute setscene
    * thus no further rebuild required

b) a fresh build, and then adjust order of PACKAGE_CLASSES. There's one bug
regarding to PACKAGE_CLASSES and do_package_setscene, that only switch the
order in PACKAGE_CLASSES generates different checksum. In this case user may
observe up to 3 rebuilds when switching package_rpm/package_ipk back and forth.

Signed-off-by: Lianhao Lu <lianhao.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
2011-01-31 16:21:48 +00:00
Joshua Lock 92f1b4976b license.bbclass: handle | (or) in the LICENSE field
The class strips out operators from the LICENSE field and to reduce it to a
list of license, | was missing but is quite frequently used so add it to the
list of replaced characters.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
2011-01-31 11:11:30 +00:00
Beth Flanagan 4bda50f289 Initial commit of license reporting:
This is an intial commit for the license reporting system. A few notes:
The LICENSE fields needs to be standardized throughout poky. As it
stands, we throw a warning if the license file is not found (either
because it does not exist or because LICENSE_FILE_CHKSUM is munged)
in the generic license directory. This should eventually become an
error.

I've seen a few places where Apache-v2.0 is written differently and
I'm sure this will throw the above warning. This does not put the
license data on the rootfs. Also, I provide both the actual license
text and a link to the best guess of the generic_license. That guessing
is not very robust and I'm loath to get into a bunch of pattern matching
rather than standardize LICENSE.

This adds one new param to poky.conf and one new to license.bbclass:

LICENSE_DIR: the base directory we copy all the license results to (set
in license.bbclass)
COMMON_LICENSE_DIR: this is the directory that holds all the common
generic license files. currently meta/files/common-licenses (set in
poky.conf)

TODO:
- We should verify the common-licenses. I stripped these from my Ubuntu
  10.10 system.
- We should allow the capability of licenses on the rootfs, although the
  resulting image created would be a lot larger.
- More common-licenses. I don't include bzip, zlib, ICS.... I should,
  but that means tracking down a lot of licenses.
- General cleanup of licensing and standardization of names. We should
  standardize on a naming convention. What's in licenses.conf should
  match up with what is in the recipes which should match with what is
  in common-licenses. Outside the scope of this though. See:
  http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650
2011-01-28 16:49:13 +00:00