Its possible for relative paths to creep into FILE. These confuse the
build system no end as its not clear where they might be releative to.
This patch ensures we always use resolved absolute paths for FILE
so that things behave in a deterministic way.
(Bitbake rev: 658d7daa70e46c2b20973b90ee53f0bbadc8bf5d)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If metadata contains:
"""
FOO = "bar"
"""
The variable FOO should get set to "bar" but doesn't due to the empty lines
be swallowed by the parser and FOO becomming part of the multiline comment.
This patch corrects that behaviour so FOO is set as expected.
[YOCTO #1377]
This patch fixes parsing of multiline comments so lines ending with \
behave consistently and we warn users where there is something happening
they likely don't expect.
(Bitbake rev: 30eaef7f50fff855cf8830772a7088dd83a4240e)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When parsing multiline variables in conf files, the last character can
be accidentally removed. s2 contains new data read from the file which
may or may not end with the continuation character. It makes sense to
let the next loop iteration strip this if needed.
We don't often use multiline expressions in .conf files which is why I'd
imagine we haven't noticed this before. Most variables are quoted and
its the closing quotation which often disappears.
(Bitbake rev: 09a9146262d58dfe4a2ea4270026b90ae33f6c91)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We will be needing this information to improve the tracebacks of python code
from the metadata, as well as to give the user information about where
variables were defined, so they know how it ended up the way it is.
(Bitbake rev: 9615c538b894f71a2d1a0ba6b3f260db91e75786)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We use a custom Logger subclass for our loggers
This logger provides:
- 'debug' method which accepts a debug level
- 'plain' method which bypasses log formatting
- 'verbose' method which is more detail than info, but less than debug
(Bitbake rev: 3b2c1fe5ca56daebb24073a9dd45723d3efd2a8d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This way we can fully utilize bblayers, you can do everything in bblayers.conf
and avoid setting any environment variables at all.
(Bitbake rev: 5def1c8c31432968349f9b29d6333d7962260a8b)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
As an example, this displays a deprecation warning for the use of
"bb.encodeurl" when you should be using "bb.fetch.encodeurl". It includes a
convenience function for this purpose. It should be of use when moving
objects between modules permanently, changing the API the user sees.
(Bitbake rev: 78f56049ba863b2e585b89db12b32697eb879bbc)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This implements a feature similar to BBCLASSEXTEND, but for generating
multiple versions of a given recipe. For example: BBVERSIONS = "1.0 2.0 git".
In addition to the above, one can utilize [a-b] style patterns, and can have a
:<basever> postfix, which allows you to essentially name the range of
versions. Both the current version and the basever end up in OVERRIDES, and
the basever gets placed into the BPV variable. The default BPV, if none is
specified, is the original PV of the recipe, before bbversions processing.
In this way, you can do things like:
BBVERSIONS = "1.0.[0-6]:1.0.0+
1.0.[7-9]:1.0.7+"
SRC_URI_append_1.0.7+ = "file://some_extra_patch.patch;patch=1"
Or you can create a recipe per range, and name the recipe file as such: nano_1.0.7+.bb.
(Bitbake rev: 4ee9a56e16f1eb3c1649eaa3127b09ab0e93d1ec)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
??= is a lazy, conditional assignment. Whereas a ?= immediately assigns to
the variable if the variable has not yet been set, ??= does not apply the
default assignment until the end of the parse. As a result, the final ??= for
a given variable is used, as opposed to the first as in ?=.
Note that the initial implementation relies upon finalise() to apply the
defaults, so a "bitbake -e" without specifying a recipe will not show the
defaults as set by ??=. Moving application of the default into getVar adds
too large a performance hit. We may want to revisit this later.
(Bitbake rev: 74f50fbca194c9c72bd2a540f4b9de458cb08e2d)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
This ensures that an anonymous python function is able to manipulate the
BBCLASSEXTEND contents, and, therefore, amend.inc files are able to add to it.
(Bitbake rev: c7d038d404afaf4ce3735af5134163759da6f6ef)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Better to error as early as possible rather than experience strange behavior
resulting from the use of the largely useless stock bitbake.conf/base.bbclass.
(Bitbake rev: 641e6cf3ec3ab4d26929cf4d2a3704ff07eed4d6)
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Do not attempt to open the file in the resolve_file method
(a lot like bb.which... maybe bb.which can be used). This way
we don't need to open/close a file which we have already parsed.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Have a growing dict with .inc and .bbclass'es. This avoids to reparse
files we have already seen.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Our parser is shit but instead to replace it now we will see
how long we can drive the wave by caching parsed files. This
will not go through the feeder again but we can just reevaluate
the StatementGroup.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Evaluate the statements after having parsed one file. This is
referred to as "entwirren" and we can remove the direct evaluation
and postpone a bit, in the future we can use a cached copy instead
of parsing the original.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
When parsing we will collect a number of statements
that can be evaluated...The plan is to be evaluate
things twice (old+new) and then compare the result,
it should be the same.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
* lineno and fn are needed in handleMethod
to restore the functionality as it was before.
(Bitbake rev: ac6792045959cfee56279c1c4597521e990848e7)
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
We want to convert this into a proper AST. So move all
such operations to methods... Later change them to generate
a node... and create that node from here.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
With obtain it was possible to use an existing fetcher to
download a bb or config file. In practive no one has used it
and it was likely broken in regard to depends_cache... Remove
it for now, simplfiy the code.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Richard Purdie
Yu Ke
Chris Larson
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Richard Purdie
Chris Larson
Holger Freyther
Chris Larson
Khem Raj
Martin Jansa