The rpm 5 has a rpm-build package, so here should use RPROVIDES rather
than PROVIDES to keep compatibility.
(From OE-Core rev: de2ee88f9cc0fc8d6d92ac2a79364e79a99ae98e)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
rpm 5.x was packaging build tools separately, so we need to unbreak
things that relied on that.
[YOCTO #11167]
(From OE-Core rev: 3b5ac72bdf76ac8ff98dc3c882a4edc77c6e2c33)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The dnf stack is written and tested against rpm 4.x. So if we want to use dnf for packaging,
we should also use rpm 4 - there's simply too much work involved in making rpm 5 work with it due
to significant API differences, and supporting that going forward.
(From OE-Core rev: 2358e786ec8d1199d90e181eb5d8d00816f669b4)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Alexander Kanavin
Robert Yang