getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True
option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace.
Search made with the following regex: getVar ?\(( ?[^,()]*), True\)
(From OE-Core rev: 0a36bd96e6b29fd99a296efc358ca3e9fb5af735)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Using the setVariable commands here followed by buildFile will result in
"basehash mismatch" errors, and that's expected since we are deviating
*at runtime* from what was previously seen by changing these variable
values. Set BB_HASH_IGNORE_MISMATCH to turn off the errors.
(From OE-Core rev: b0169796f294bbec0397b7eae86454a46b68cdc5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Extracting the source for a recipe (as used by devtool's extract, modify
and upgrade subcommands) requires us to run do_fetch, do_unpack,
do_patch and any tasks that the recipe has inserted inbetween, and do so
with a modified datastore primarily so that we can redirect WORKDIR and
STAMPS_DIR in order to have the files written out to a place of our
choosing and avoid stamping the tasks as having executed in a real build
context respectively. However, this all gets much more difficult when in
memres mode since we can't call internal functions such as
bb.build.exec_func() directly - instead we need to execute the tasks on
the server. To do this we use the buildFile command which already exists
for the purpose of supporting bitbake -b, and setVariable commands to
set up the appropriate datastore.
(I did look at passing the modified datastore to the buildFile command
instead of using setVar() on the main datastore, however its use of
databuilder makes that very difficult, and we'd also need a different
method of getting the changes in the datastore over to the worker as
well.)
(From OE-Core rev: eb63b5339014fc72ba4829714e0a96a98e135ee2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If PATCHTOOL is "git", and PATCH_COMMIT_FUNCTIONS is set to "1", for
additional tasks between do_unpack and do_patch, make a git commit. This
logic was previously implemented in devtool itself, but it makes more
sense for it to be implemented in the patch class since that's where the
rest of the logic is for this (or in lib/oe/patch.py). It also makes
it possible for this to work with tinfoil2.
(From OE-Core rev: f24f59ea1d8bc335ea8576f6a346d0935f4a3548)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file() and Tinfoil.parse_recipe() instead of
the recipeutils equivalents, and replace any local duplicate
implementations. This not only tidies up the code but also allows these
calls to work in memres mode.
(From OE-Core rev: f13b56266ee96dfab65a3a7db50e8051aa9f071a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
(From OE-Core rev: 857c06d6a1d161bf5a01311d07758bd4241929a3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a patch remotely fetched in a recipe (e.g. from an http
server) that needs updating then add a local version and substitute the
entry in SRC_URI to point to it.
One can argue about how desirable it is to be modifying patches fetched
in this way, but then one can argue about how desirable it is to have
such patches in the recipe in the first place - and in any case if
devtool update-recipe is to correctly transfer changes to such patches
made in the git repository within the source tree to the recipe then
there isn't much choice but to do it this way.
(From OE-Core rev: a19c26cc78a181f9dd2706dd42e7e450d7ad4082)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
(From OE-Core rev: e47d21624dfec6f71742b837e91da553f18a28c5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As of the move to Python 3 and the fixes we applied at that time,
bb.process.run() will return a byte array of length 0 rather than an
empty string if the output is empty. That may be a bug that we should
fix, but for now it's easiest to just check the result here before
treating it as a string. This fixes running "devtool update-recipe" or
"devtool finish" on a recipe which has no source tree, for example
initramfs-framework.
Fixes [YOCTO #10563].
(From OE-Core rev: 66bf6978fc807ecc422fb6b6328f68bc3406cf15)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
(From OE-Core rev: 9303d8055c45a0f6af295d70a6f6a8b9d8d8a7c9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run devtool finish to move a recipe created in the workspace by
devtool add or devtool upgrade to a layer, and that layer is not
currently included in bblayers.conf (perhaps unintentionally), then the
recipe will no longer be visible to bitbake. In this scenario, show a
warning so that the user isn't surprised by the recipe "going missing".
(From OE-Core rev: 4da8a58e2997db4f24ae0cac0ba27259d7857a05)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If devtool finish is run on a recipe where the recipe file itself is in
the workspace (e.g. where devtool add / devtool upgrade has been used)
and the specified destination layer is not in bblayers.conf, then we
need to avoid running bitbake -c clean at the end because the recipe has
been moved, but the bbappend is still present in the workspace layer at
that point and so if we do it will fail due to the dangling bbappend.
It's difficult to do the clean at the point we'd want to because tinfoil
is holding bitbake.lock for most of the time, but in any case cleaning
the recipe is less important than it used to be since we started
managing the sysroot contents more strictly, so just disable cleaning
under these circumstances to avoid the problem.
Fixes [YOCTO #10484].
(From OE-Core rev: c6980307d43632f4172e79d9607004203af4e9c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When running devtool add, instead of hiding the recipetool create
output, change it so that it's appropriate to show in the devtool
context and show it in real-time. This means that you get status output
such as when a URL is being fetched (though currently no progress
information.) recipetool create now has a hidden --devtool option to
enable this display mode.
(From OE-Core rev: 219aec8803de4ef04c514c87ecfb15359c9424a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With recent changes to recipeutils, the list of local files returned
by get_recipe_local_files could possibly include source files. This
only happens when the recipe contains a SRC_URI using subdir= to put
files in the source tree. These files should be ignored when
populating the list of local files for oe-local-files directory.
[YOCTO #10326]
introduced in
OE-Core revision 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309
(From OE-Core rev: 31f1bbad248c36a8c86dde4ff57ce42efc664082)
Signed-off-by: Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user runs devtool add on an npm:// URL (or source tree that uses
node.js), and npm is not available, just build nodejs-native instead of
telling the user they need to do it; if that fails because there isn't
any such recipe (which would be the default, since it's not in OE-Core)
then produce a slightly more readable error message hinting at what the
user needs to do.
Note that this forces the use of nodejs-native rather than npm on the
host - this makes sense for two reasons: (1) we need it to be compatible
with nodejs for the target, and (2) we have to have a recipe for that
anyway, so allowing you to avoid having a recipe for the native version
isn't really beneficial.
There's a bit of a hack in here in order to allow this - for node.js
sources that aren't fetched via npm we don't know that they are that
until we've fetched and unpacked them, by which time we're inside
recipetool and have an active tinfoil instance that will prevent bitbake
being run. To avoid this being an issue, we allow recipetool to get to
the point where we know we need npm and then exit with a specific exit
code, at which point devtool can try to build it and then if that
succeeds, it will re-execute recipetool. This is definitely not ideal,
but it can't really be refactored and done properly until we do the
tinfoil2 refactoring; in the mean time though we still want to be
helpful to the user.
Fixes [YOCTO #10337].
(From OE-Core rev: f40662bde5aab158c4e4c3c3ff5e68665a4194a5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We want to remove the -f/--fetch option at some point (as you can now
specify a URL as a positional argument instead) so display a warning
that it's deprecated if it is used.
(From OE-Core rev: 43476d77a91d50454ca26e016a3413b24e9f3aec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were supposed to be printing out the specified recipe name here but I
forgot to specify a parameter for the string.
(From OE-Core rev: 87f844e533adfc229a5d26857a82cc6b125216c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that recipeutils.validate_pn() properly validates characters used in
the name, we can drop this bit checking for '/' since that's not
permitted by validate_pn(). (The FIXME comment here - that I myself
apparently wrote - is questionable since that function was clearly never
intended to allow '/', perhaps I was misled because it was broken and
did so).
(From OE-Core rev: e010d9be3709cf3c607ffc03c3188abe4e1e9eb4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In keeping with making recipetool create / devtool add as easy to use as
possible, users shouldn't have to know how to reformat git short form ssh
URLs for consumption by BitBake's fetcher (for example
user@git.example.com:repo.git should be expressed as
git://user@git.example.com/repo.git;protocol=ssh ) - instead we should
just take care of that automatically. Add some logic in the appropriate
places to do that.
(From OE-Core rev: 78c672a72f49c4b6cfd8c247efcc676b0ba1681a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
(From OE-Core rev: 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
(From OE-Core rev: 5ec6d9ef309b841cdcbf1d14ac678d106d5d888a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When using PATCHTOOL = "git", the user of the system is not really the
committer - it's the build system itself. Thus, specify "dummy" values
for username and email instead of using the user's configured values.
Various parts of the devtool code that need to make commits have also
been updated to use the same logic.
This allows PATCHTOOL = "git" and devtool to be used on systems where
git user.name / user.email has not been set (on versions of git where
it doesn't default a value under this circumstance).
If you want to return to the old behaviour where the externally
configured user name / email are used, set the following in your
local.conf:
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME = ""
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL = ""
Fixes [YOCTO #8703].
(From OE-Core rev: 765a9017eaf77ea3204fb10afb8181629680bd82)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The --wilcard-version flag was only used in the srcrev variant of the
update-recipe command.
(From OE-Core rev: d3057cba0b01484712fcee3c52373c143608a436)
Signed-off-by: Ola x Nilsson <ola.x.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Unfortunately to implenent multiconfig support in bitbake some APIs
had to change. This updates code in OE to match the changes in bitbake.
Its mostly periperhal changes around devtool/recipetool
[Will need a bitbake version requirement bump which I'll make when merging]
(From OE-Core rev: 041212fa37bb83acac5ce4ceb9b7b77ad172c5c3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a subcommand which will "finish" the work on a recipe. This is
effectively the same as update-recipe followed by reset, except that the
destination layer is required and it will do the right thing depending
on the situation - if the recipe file itself is in the workspace (e.g.
as a result of devtool add), the recipe file and any associated files
will be moved to the destination layer; or if the destination layer is
the one containing the original recipe, the recipe will be overwritten;
otherwise a bbappend will be created to apply the changes. In all cases
the layer path can be loosely specified - it could be a layer name, or
a partial path into a recipe. In the case of upgrades, devtool finish
will also take care of deleting the old recipe.
This avoids the user having to figure out the correct actions when
they're done - they just do "devtool finish recipename layername" and
it saves their work and then removes the recipe from the workspace.
Addresses [YOCTO #8594].
(From OE-Core rev: fa550fcb9333d59b28fc0e4aebde888831410f5c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to update the recipe
or create the bbappend depending on the destination.
(From OE-Core rev: 5067cdc73483b53d46d9bf584723e41957c7ec54)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This will be called by "devtool finish" to allow it to reset the recipe
at the end.
(From OE-Core rev: b8d398516556eaf97679e28ad58448f570984b52)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If there are files in the oe-local-files directory which are identical
to the original version, then we shouldn't be copying them to the
destination layer. This is particularly important when using the -a
option to create a bbappend.
(From OE-Core rev: 9230bfcc839eb35630949f0a8ed058ca1fa944b1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool update-recipe was defaulting to the ${BPN} named directory when
adding patches next to a recipe, but that meant if you already had files
in a ${BP} named directory (i.e. name and version) or "files" then you'd
end up with two directories next to the recipe, which is usually not
what you want. To avoid this, look through FILESPATH and take the first
one that's the same level or one level down from the recipe and already
exists, if any.
(From OE-Core rev: c7a8190cf8bdf86ba850b6780b8e951e90232c06)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is currently possible to specify a file (e.g. a tarball) on the local
disk as the source, but you have to know to put file:// in front of it.
There's really no need to force users to jump through that hoop if they
really want to do this so check if the specified source is a file and
prefix it with file:// if that's the case.
Also ensure the same works for "devtool add" at the same time.
(From OE-Core rev: 71350003790c38e84b0e525a71a2fe5d24e3d083)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Certain recipes cannot be used with devtool extract / modify / upgrade -
usually because they don't provide any source. Return a specific exit
code (4) so that scripts such as scripts/contrib/devtool-stress.py know
the difference between this and a genuine failure.
(From OE-Core rev: ffd295fed4ab81fc0bd00bb145ef4d72c49584bf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were attempting to open the recipe file unconditionally here - we
need to account for the possibility that the recipe file has been
deleted or moved away by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 47822a2aff56fd338c16b5ad756feda9f395a8a1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In OE-Core revision 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc I changed
the default update-recipe behaviour to only update patches for commits
that were changed; unfortunately I failed to handle the --initial-rev
option which was broken after that point. Rework how the initial
revision is passed in so that it now operates correctly.
(From OE-Core rev: b2ca2523cc9e51a4759b4420b07b0b67b3f5ac43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow specifying more than one recipe on the devtool reset command line.
Also tweak the help text slightly.
(From OE-Core rev: ad92ed8e4f7f48a3d212962531d596b36f6b284f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Converted return value of items() keys() and values() to
lists when dictionary is modified in the loop and when
the result is added to the list.
(From OE-Core rev: 874a269eb1d70060c2f3b3f8b70800e2aea789f4)
Signed-off-by: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
(From OE-Core rev: d022b4335100612d6596cc4c4956cb98ed5873cc)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Iterators now return views, not lists in python3. Where we need
lists, handle this explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: caebd862bac7eed725e0f0321bf50793671b5312)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If fetching source from a git repository, typically within OpenEmbedded
we encourage setting SRCREV to a fixed revision, so change to do that by
default and add a -a/--autorev option to use "${AUTOREV}" instead.
(From OE-Core rev: 000480c42797dd2f03ebc3bc6d1dabfc6a7b75f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Strictly speaking we ought to explicitly shut down a tinfoil instance
when we're done with it. This doesn't affect modify's operation but is
important if you want to be able to call into modify() from another
plugin (though anyone doing so should be advised that the function is
by no means a stable API and is subject to change in future releases).
(From OE-Core rev: 626dbadf22b57a22a8f8b9d1957937120f4ba4d5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we add from a fetched URL we are supposed to turn the resulting
source tree into a git repository (if it isn't already one). However, we
were using the older deprecated option name here instead of the
positional argument, so "devtool add -f <url>" resulted in the repo
being created but "devtool add <url>" didn't, which was wrong.
Also update the oe-selftest tests to check that this worked.
(From OE-Core rev: a7b6b1f8cc1c096724f794ac9dee312b0f771f66)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The npm class just installs whatever is in ${S}; if you're using
externalsrc in conjunction with it the symlinks (oe-workdir and oe-logs
by default) plus singletask.lock will end up in the final package, which
isn't really right. Introduce a variable so we know the path the files
will be installed into within npm.bbclass, and append to do_install
within the workspace bbappend to delete the files.
(From OE-Core rev: 766845e06db9d7d595e836ea1364c16fa132a413)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Otherwise (if the symlink is named .config) kernel build considers
source tree as dirty and fails.
[YOCTO #9270]
(From OE-Core rev: d36699b28c661880957d744420df9e23cdd76957)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow plugins to create additional files to go alongside the recipe. The
plugins don't know what the output filename is going to be, so they need
to put the files in a temporary location and add them to an "extrafiles"
dict within extravalues where the destination filename is the key and
the temporary path is the value.
devtool add was also extended to ensure these files get moved in and
preserved upon reset if they've been edited by the user.
(From OE-Core rev: 334b9451111b7e3efbb43b3a4eecebcab8ec6f0e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you for example ran devtool modify virtual/libusb0 without specifying
a source tree path, the default was <workspace>/sources/virtual/libusb0
which isn't correct - it should be using the mapped name i.e.
libusb-compat (in the default OE-Core configuration). Reorder some of
the code to ensure that the mapped name is used.
(From OE-Core rev: c51736df17da8e6e561dd5b7ce59cb08254da870)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As suggested by Khem Raj.
(From OE-Core rev: 36cc6b81d0281348a0f241a80ddd427745a6a678)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Create config fragment if the user makes modifications to kernel config.
User may change .config e.g. by directly editing it or by running the
'do_menuconfig' bitbake task. Devtool generates one monolithic fragment
by simply doing a diff between .config and .config.baseline files in the
source directory. If either of these files is missing, the config
fragment is not gerenrated or updated. The output is a file,
'devtool-fragment.cfg' that gets added to SRC_URI in the recipe (as well
as copied into the 'oe-local-files' directory if that is present in the
source tree).
${S}/.config will be a symlink to ${B}/.config. We need to do this as
devtool is not able to access ${B} because ${B} is set in a .bbappend in
the workspace layer which is not parsed by devtool itself.
[YOCTO #8999]
(From OE-Core rev: 524da136e5b837a60682516ac08f3092c635e934)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Copy kernel config is copied to the source directory at a later phase in
_extract_source() so that it gets copied when devtool sync is done, too.
(From OE-Core rev: ff895be7a46c4b3b1b791e5387490d90bb34fce2)
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I should have adjusted this in OE-Core commit
80a44e52609a89d9ffe816181ae193af491c06ac where the behaviour changed.
(From OE-Core rev: 13409a2b899bb74b8060c840b8c7ef8759d099cb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The listing of subcommands in the --help output for devtool was starting
to get difficult to follow, with commands appearing in no particular
order (due to some being in separate modules and the order of those
modules being parsed). Logically grouping the subcommands as well as
being able to exercise some control over the order of the subcommands
and groups would help, if we do so without losing the dynamic nature of
the list (i.e. that it comes from the plugins). Argparse provides no
built-in way to handle this and really, really makes it a pain to add,
but with some subclassing and hacking it's now possible, and can be
extended by any plugin as desired.
To put a subcommand into a group, all you need to do is specify a group=
parameter in the call to subparsers.add_parser(). you can also specify
an order= parameter to make the subcommand sort higher or lower in the
list (higher order numbers appear first, so use negative numbers to
force items to the end if that's what you want). To add a new group, use
subparsers.add_subparser_group(), supplying the name, description and
optionally an order number for the group itself (again, higher numbers
appear first).
(From OE-Core rev: e1b9d31e6ea3c254ecfe940fe795af44761e0e69)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Joshua Lock
Paul Eggleton
Stephano Cetola
Ola x Nilsson
Richard Purdie
Ed Bartosh
Markus Lehtonen