For a long time we've provided PN-PV and PN-PV-PR by tweaking PROVIDES. This looks
nice at first glance however it turns out to be a bit problematic. Taking make as an
example where there are two versions, 3.81 and 3.82, what should "bitbake make-3.81" do?
Currently it builds make-3.81 and make-3.82 and breaks in interesting ways. Is that
a bitbake bug? Well, it certainly shouldn't try and run the build. Why is it building
3.82 though? Its due to finding a dependency on "make-dev" and then trying to figure
out what provides it? The answer is "make" and the default version of "make" is 3.82.
So arguably, finding "make-3.81" should infer PREFERRED_VERSION_make = "3.81". Doing
so resolved the above problem since now "make" resolves to "make-3.81".
So what about if we have Recipe A:
DEPENDS = "make-3.81"
and Recipe B:
DEPENDS = "make-3.82"
That is clearly an error, easy. So finally what about if we have Recipe A:
DEPENDS = "make-3.81"
and Recipe B:
DEPENDS = "make"
The first recipe infers the PREFERRED_VERSION_make = "3.81" and then forces that
version on everything else. Is that desired? Probably not in most cases, at least not
silently.
As mitigation, we could print a WARNING about this happening. The final part of the problem
is that we can ony figure this out within bitbake itself. That means we'd have to teach bitbake
about the PN-PV format of PROVIDES which is breaking the separation between bitbake and the
metadata. We can't win :(.
Nobody that I know of is using or relying on this functionality so perhaps we should
just remove it instead which is what this patch does. Opinions?
(From OE-Core rev: a87c205bb6cefd5e1a41b8e7ef02b5bfa380e3b6)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
493e8b46fd