u-boot/include/config_fsl_chain_trust.h

111 lines
3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
*/
secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two parts There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
2016-01-22 11:07:24 +00:00
#ifndef __CONFIG_FSL_CHAIN_TRUST_H
#define __CONFIG_FSL_CHAIN_TRUST_H
secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two parts There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
2016-01-22 11:07:24 +00:00
/* For secure boot, since ENVIRONMENT in flash/external memories is
* not verified, undef CONFIG_ENV_xxx and set default env
* (CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE)
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT
secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two parts There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
2016-01-22 11:07:24 +00:00
#undef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM
#undef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_NAND
#undef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
#undef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
#undef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE
#endif
secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two parts There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
2016-01-22 11:07:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST
#ifndef CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV
#define CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV ""
#endif
/*
* Control should not reach back to uboot after validation of images
* for secure boot flow and therefore bootscript should have
* the bootm command. If control reaches back to uboot anyhow
* after validating images, core should just spin.
*/
/*
* Define the key hash for boot script here if public/private key pair used to
* sign bootscript are different from the SRK hash put in the fuse
* Example of defining KEY_HASH is
* #define CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_KEY_HASH \
* "41066b564c6ffcef40ccbc1e0a5d0d519604000c785d97bbefd25e4d288d1c8b"
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTARGS
#define CONFIG_SET_BOOTARGS "setenv bootargs \'" CONFIG_BOOTARGS" \';"
#else
#define CONFIG_SET_BOOTARGS "setenv bootargs \'root=/dev/ram " \
"rw console=ttyS0,115200 ramdisk_size=600000\';"
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_KEY_HASH
#define CONFIG_SECBOOT \
"setenv bs_hdraddr " __stringify(CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_HDR_ADDR)";" \
CONFIG_SET_BOOTARGS \
CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV \
"esbc_validate $bs_hdraddr " \
__stringify(CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_KEY_HASH)";" \
"source $img_addr;" \
"esbc_halt\0"
#else
#define CONFIG_SECBOOT \
"setenv bs_hdraddr " __stringify(CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_HDR_ADDR)";" \
CONFIG_SET_BOOTARGS \
CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV \
"esbc_validate $bs_hdraddr;" \
"source $img_addr;" \
"esbc_halt\0"
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_COPY_RAM
#define CONFIG_BS_COPY_ENV \
"setenv bs_hdr_ram " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_HDR_ADDR_RAM)";" \
"setenv bs_hdr_flash " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_HDR_ADDR_FLASH)";" \
"setenv bs_hdr_size " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_HDR_SIZE)";" \
"setenv bs_ram " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_ADDR_RAM)";" \
"setenv bs_flash " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_ADDR_FLASH)";" \
"setenv bs_size " __stringify(CONFIG_BS_SIZE)";"
/* For secure boot flow, default environment used will be used */
#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT)
#if defined(CONFIG_RAMBOOT_NAND)
#define CONFIG_BS_COPY_CMD \
"nand read $bs_hdr_ram $bs_hdr_flash $bs_hdr_size ;" \
"nand read $bs_ram $bs_flash $bs_size ;"
#endif /* CONFIG_RAMBOOT_NAND */
#else
#define CONFIG_BS_COPY_CMD \
"cp.b $bs_hdr_flash $bs_hdr_ram $bs_hdr_size ;" \
"cp.b $bs_flash $bs_ram $bs_size ;"
#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_BOOTSCRIPT_COPY_RAM */
#ifndef CONFIG_BS_COPY_ENV
#define CONFIG_BS_COPY_ENV
#endif
#ifndef CONFIG_BS_COPY_CMD
#define CONFIG_BS_COPY_CMD
#endif
secure_boot: split the secure boot functionality in two parts There are two phases in Secure Boot 1. ISBC: In BootROM, validate the BootLoader (U-Boot). 2. ESBC: In U-Boot, continuing the Chain of Trust by validating and booting LINUX. For ESBC phase, there is no difference in SoC's based on ARM or PowerPC cores. But the exit conditions after ISBC phase i.e. entry conditions for U-Boot are different for ARM and PowerPC. PowerPC: If Secure Boot is executed, a separate U-Boot target is required which must be compiled with a diffrent Text Base as compared to Non-Secure Boot. There are some LAW and TLB settings which are required specifically for Secure Boot scenario. ARM: ARM based SoC's have a fixed memory map and exit conditions from BootROM are same irrespective of boot mode (Secure or Non-Secure). Thus the current Secure Boot functionlity has been split into two parts: CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST This will have the following functionality as part of U-Boot: 1. Enable commands like esbc_validate, esbc_halt 2. Change the environment settings based on bootmode, determined at run time: - If bootmode is non-secure, no change - If bootmode is secure, set the following: - bootdelay = 0 (Don't give boot prompt) - bootcmd = Validate and execute the bootscript. CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT This is defined only for creating a different compile time target for secure boot. Traditionally, both these functionalities were defined under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT. This patch is aimed at removing the requirement for a separate Secure Boot target for ARM based SoC's. CONFIG_CHAIN_OF_TRUST will be defined and boot mode will be determine at run time. Another Security Requirement for running CHAIN_OF_TRUST is that U-Boot environemnt must not be picked from flash/external memory. This cannot be done based on bootmode at run time in current U-Boot architecture. Once this dependency is resolved, no separate SECURE_BOOT target will be required for ARM based SoC's. Currently, the only code under CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT for ARM SoC's is defining CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com> Acked-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
2016-01-22 11:07:24 +00:00
#define CONFIG_CHAIN_BOOT_CMD CONFIG_BS_COPY_ENV \
CONFIG_BS_COPY_CMD \
CONFIG_SECBOOT
#endif
#endif