x86: fsp: Report correct number of E820 table entries

The logic to calculate the number of E820 table entries is wrong
when walking through the FSP HOB tables. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jian Luo <jian.luo4@boschrexroth.de>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Bin Meng 2015-09-28 02:11:59 -07:00 committed by Simon Glass
parent c1446ac6c1
commit 196193a4d4
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -72,9 +72,10 @@ unsigned install_e820_map(unsigned max_entries, struct e820entry *entries)
entries[num_entries].type = E820_RAM;
else if (res_desc->type == RES_MEM_RESERVED)
entries[num_entries].type = E820_RESERVED;
num_entries++;
}
hdr = get_next_hob(hdr);
num_entries++;
}
/* Mark PCIe ECAM address range as reserved */