x86: ivybridge: Use 'ret' instead of 'rcode'

For consistency, use 'ret' to handle a return value.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Simon Glass 2015-10-18 15:55:32 -06:00
parent 9a4eb5977a
commit 53327d3e61
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ static int read_seed_from_cmos(struct pei_data *pei_data)
{
u16 c1, c2, checksum, seed_checksum;
struct udevice *dev;
int rcode = 0;
int ret = 0;
rcode = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RTC, 0, &dev);
if (rcode) {
debug("Cannot find RTC: err=%d\n", rcode);
ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RTC, 0, &dev);
if (ret) {
debug("Cannot find RTC: err=%d\n", ret);
return -ENODEV;
}
@ -170,11 +170,11 @@ static int write_seeds_to_cmos(struct pei_data *pei_data)
{
u16 c1, c2, checksum;
struct udevice *dev;
int rcode = 0;
int ret = 0;
rcode = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RTC, 0, &dev);
if (rcode) {
debug("Cannot find RTC: err=%d\n", rcode);
ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RTC, 0, &dev);
if (ret) {
debug("Cannot find RTC: err=%d\n", ret);
return -ENODEV;
}