GCC 6.2 reasonably complains about the current code:
../cmd/tpm_test.c: In function ‘do_tpmtest’:
../cmd/tpm_test.c:540:3: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++)
^~~
../cmd/tpm_test.c:542:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
printf("\n------\n");
^~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Updated to remove C99 variable decl:
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Now that they are in their own directory, we can remove this prefix.
This makes it easier to find a file since the prefix does not get in the
way.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Stefan Brüns
Simon Glass