sysmocom
/
asterisk
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update the Mantis Workflow document in doxygen. 

(closes issue #17175)
Reported by: lmadsen
Patches:
      Bug_Tracker_Workflow.v2.txt uploaded by pabelanger (license 224)
Tested by: pabelanger, lmadsen

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@259438 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This commit is contained in:
Leif Madsen 2010-04-27 21:10:32 +00:00
parent 57c8eea6fe
commit 595245c0e0
1 changed files with 174 additions and 173 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

347
include/asterisk/doxygen/mantisworkflow.h
View File

@ -24,182 +24,183 @@
* \AsteriskTrunkWarning
*
* <hr/>
*
* The purpose of this document is to briefly describe the various statuses an
* issue can be placed in, and what that status means. In addition, the simple
* workflow and transition between statuses will be discussed.
*
* \section StatusDefinitions Issue Status Definitions
* \section WorkflowDescription Description of the Issue Tracker Workflow
*
* (This document is most beneficial for Asterisk bug marshals, however it is good
* reading for anyone who may be filing issues or wondering how the Asterisk Open
* Source project moves issues through from filing to completion.)
*
* The workflow in the issue tracker should be handled in the following way:
*
* -# A bug is reported and is automatically placed in the 'New' status.
* -# The Bug Marshall team should go through bugs in the 'New' status to determine
* whether the report is valid (not a duplicate, hasn't already been fixed, not
* a Digium tech support issue, etc.). Invalid reports should be set to
* 'Closed' with the appropriate resolution set. Categories and descriptions
* should be corrected at this point.[Note1]\n
* Issues should also have enough information for a developer to either
* reproduce the issue or determine where an issue exists (or both). If this is
* not the case then the issue should be moved to 'Feedback' prior to moving
* forward in the workflow.
* -# The next step is to determine whether the report is about a bug or a
* submission of a new feature:
* -# BUG: A bug should be moved into the status 'Acknowledged' if enough
* information has been provided by the reporter to either reproduce the
* issue or clearly see where an issue may lie. The bug may also be
* assigned to a developer for the creation of the initial patch, or
* review of the issue.\n
* Once a patch has been created for the issue and attached, the issue can
* then be moved to the 'Confirmed' status. At this point, initial code
* review and discussion about the patch will take place. Once an adequate
* amount of support for the implementation of the patch is acquired, then
* the bug can be moved to the 'Ready for Testing' status for wider
* testing by the community. After the testing phase is complete and it
* appears the issue is resolved, the patch can be committed by a
* developer and closed.
* -# FEATURE: As new features should be filed with a patch, it can be
* immediately moved to the 'confirmed' status, making it ready for basic
* formatting and code review. From there any changes to style or feel of
* the patch based on feedback from the community can be discussed, and
* changes to the patch made. It can then be moved forward to the 'Ready
* for Testing' status. Once the feature has been merged, or a decision
* has been made that it will not be merged, the issue should be taken to
* 'Closed' with the appropriate resolution.[Note2]
* -# If at any point in the workflow, an issue requires feedback from the original
* poster of the issue, the status should be changed to 'Feedback'. Once the
* required information has been provided, it should be placed back in the
* appropriate point of the workflow.
* -# If at any point in the workflow, a developer or bug marshal would like to
* take responsibility for doing the work that is necessary to progress an
* issue, the status can be changed to 'Assigned'. At that point the developer
* assigned to the issue will be responsible for moving the issue to completion.
*
* \section WorkflowSummary Workflow Summary
*
* The following is a list of valid statuses and what they mean to the work flow.
*
* \subsection New New
* The 'New' status is where all bugs start. This is an issue which has not
* received a review by a bug marshal to move it to an appropriate next
* status. Steps required to move to the next logical step include:
* This issue is awaiting review by bug marshals. Categorization and summaries
* should be fixed as appropriate.
*
* \subsection Feedback
* This issue requires feedback from the poster of the issue before any
* additional progress in the workflow can be made. This may include providing
* additional debugging information, or a backtrace with DONT_OPTIMIZE enabled,
* for example. (See the doc/HOWTO_collect_debug_information.txt file in your
* Asterisk source.)
*
* \subsection Acknowledged
* This is a submitted bug which has no patch associated with it, but appears
* to be a valid bug based on the description and provided debugging
* information.
*
* \subsection Confirmed
* The patch associated with this issue requires initial formatting and code
* review, and may have some initial testing done. It is waiting for a
* developer to confirm the patch will no longer need large changes made to it,
* and is ready for wider testing from the community. This stage is used for
* discussing the feel and style of a patch, in addition to the coding style
* utilized.
*
* \subsection Ready For Testing
* This is an issue which has a patch that is waiting for testing feedback from
* the community after it has been deemed to no longer need larger changes.
*
* \subsection Assigned
* A developer or bug marshal has taken responsibility for taking the necessary
* steps to move forward in the workflow. Once the issue is ready to be
* reviewed and feedback provided, it should be placed back into the
* appropriate place of the workflow.
*
* \subsection Resolved
* A resolution for this issue has been reached. This issue should immediately
* be Closed.
*
* \subsection Closed
* No further action is necessary for this issue.
*
* \section SeverityLevels Severity Levels
*
* Severity levels generally represent the number of users who are potentially
* affected by the reported issue.
*
* \subsection Feature Feature
* This issue is a new feature and will only be committed to Asterisk trunk.
* Asterisk trunk is where future branches will be created and thus this
* feature will only be found in future branches of Asterisk and not merged
* into existing branches. (See Release Branch Commit Policy below.)
*
* \subsection Trivial Trivial
* A trivial issue is something that either affects an insignificant number of
* Asterisk users, or is a minimally invasive change that does not affect
* functionality.
*
* \subsection Text Text
* A text issue is typically something like a spelling fix, a clarifying of a
* debugging or verbose message, or changes to documentation.
*
* \subsection Tweak Tweak
* A tweak to the code the has the potential to either make code clearer to
* read, or a change that could speed up processing in certain circumstances.
* These changes are typically only a couple of lines.
*
* \subsection Minor Minor
* An issue that does not affect a large number of Asterisk users, but not an
* insignificant number. The number of lines of code and development effort to
* resolve this issue could be non-trivial.
*
* \subsection Major Major
* As issue that affects the majority of Asterisk users. The number of lines of
* code and development effort required to resolve this issue could be
* non-trivial.
*
* \subsection Crash Crash
* An issue marked as a Crash is something that would cause Asterisk to be
* unusable for a majority of Asterisk users and is an issue that causes a
* deadlock or crash of the Asterisk process.
*
* \subsection Block Block
* A blocking issue is an issue that must be resolved before the next release
* of Asterisk as would affect a significant number of Asterisk users, or could
* be a highly visible regression. A severity of block should only be set by
* Asterisk bug marshals at their discretion.
*
* *** USERS SHOULD NOT FILE ISSUES WITH A SEVERITY OF BLOCK ***
*
* \section PriorityLevels Priority Levels
*
* \arg checking Category and Severity are set correctly
* \arg verifying the issue does not look like a support issue (if so, note
* the reporter should use the appropriate support channels, and change
* status to Closed)
* \arg determine that enough debugging information has been provided so that
* a developer can move the issue forward (e.g. on SIP issues, that the
* standard SIP debug and history, console output, and configuration
* file information has been provided, or in the case of a crash issue,
* that a proper backtrace has been provided)
* Currently, the following priority levels are listed on the issue tracker:
* - None
* - Low
* - Normal
* - High
* - Urgent
* - Immediate
*
* If the necessary information has not been collected, then the issue
* should be moved to Feedback status, and the missing information be
* requested by the reporter*.
* However, at this time they are not utilized and all new issue should have a priority of 'Normal'.
*
* When all required information has been collected, the issue can be moved
* to the Acknowledged status.
*
* \note (*) issues which remain in the Feedback status for more than 2 weeks
* without feedback from the reporter should be marked as
* Closed/Suspended
*
* \subsection Acknowledged Acknowledged
* The 'Acknowledged' status is the first step to issue resolution. It is
* an issue that has been filed correctly, the categorization and severity
* have been set, and that initial debugging information has been
* collected.
*
* A developer may then review the issue tracker for Acknowledged issues
* and to determine whether additional information is necessary (i.e. that
* a crash issue with backtrace requires valgrind output, or other
* non-standard debugging feedback).
*
* Issues may be moved to the next step in the workflow when the developer
* has either determined the issue is Confirmed, requires additional
* Feedback, is an issue that has already been resolved (or does not need
* to be resolved), in which case it should be Closed.
*
* \subsection Confirmed Confirmed
* The 'Confirmed' status represents issues which have been verified as
* existing in the current branch(es), and has all necessary information to
* be accepted into Acknowledged status. The general qualifier for an issue
* being moved to Confirmed is more than one community member stating the
* issue exists.
*
* Confirmed issues may also contain patches created by developers which
* need to be applied in order to gain further knowledge or debugging by
* the original reporter, or any other community member who has verified
* this issue as existing. The developer will then move the issue to
* Feedback status while waiting for information from the reporter(s).
*
* Issues with patches that are candidates for inclusion into the various
* branches that should resolve the issue are to be moved to the
* Ready for Testing status.
*
* \subsection ReadyForTesting Ready for Testing
* 'Ready for Testing' indicates issues which have patches available for
* testing by community members or the original reporter which should
* resolve the reported issue.
*
* If the patch does not resolve the issue, then it should be placed back
* into Confirmed status until an additional patch can be created for
* testing.
*
* If the patch resolves the issue, then it should be moved to the Ready
* for Review status.
*
* \subsection ReadyForReview Ready for Review
* When an issue has a patch that has been tested by a community member and
* which resolves the originally reported issue, should then be moved to
* the Ready for Review status. Issues marked as Ready for Review should
* then either be reviewed by another developer prior to merging (if it is
* a non-invasive fix), or the patch should be placed on Reviewboard if it
* is a complicated or invasive fix.
*
* If an issue has a reviewboard link, it should be placed in the
* Additional Information section of an issue, and the marker [review]
* prefixed to the issue title.
*
* \subsection Resolved Resolved
* The Resolved status is rarely used directly by manual intervention, but
* rather is utilized by svnbot and other automated methods prior to an
* issue being closed.
*
* \subsection Feedback Feedback
* Feedback is used when an issue is awaiting information from the original
* reporter, or other active members of the community in the issue. Issues
* which remain in the feedback state longer than 2 weeks without feedback
* from any active participants, and which cannot be moved without, are to
* be Closed and marked as suspended.
*
* \subsection LicenseRequired License Required
* License Required is used when a patch has been attached to an issue, but
* which is currently in the License Pending state, or has been rejected
* and is awaiting the reporter to resign the license.
*
* \subsection Assigned Assigned
* Issues marked as Assigned are the responsibility of the assigned
* developer, typically because they contain some sort of special knowledge
* required to resolve the issue, or because they have decided to take
* responsibility for moving the issue to resolution.
*
* \subsection Closed Closed
* Issues which have a resolution are marked as Closed. There are several
* resolutions that a Closed issue can contain, such as Fixed, Won't Fix,
* Duplicate, or Suspended. Issues that have been Closed manually should
* have an appropriate resolution set such as Suspended or Won't Fix, along
* with a note indicating why the issue was Closed.
*
* If the issue is being closed due to a lack of feedback, the resolution
* should be Suspended, and a note indicating the issue was closed due to
* a lack of feedback, and that it will be reopened upon request if the
* reporter can provide the necessary information to move the issue forward
* again.
*
* <hr/>
*
* \section TypicalWorkflow Typical Workflow
*
* The typical workflow of an issue is as follows:
*
* \subsection Brief Brief
*
* New --> Feedback(*) --> Acknowledged --> Confirmed --> Ready for Testing
* --> Ready for Review --> Closed (commited, closed by svnbot)
*
* \note (*)Optional status used when not enough information provided to move to
* Acknowledged.
*
* \subsection Verbose Verbose
*
* - Issue is filed by a community member. All issues will start in the status New.
*
* - An issue marshal then performs triage on New issues and determined if they are
* valid issues (non-support), have been correctly categorized, have the
* necessary debugging information, etc...
* - Issues without the necessary information are moved to Feedback
* - Issues that are support, or feature requests without patches, are Closed
* - Issues that have all the necessary debugging information to move forward
* are Acknowledged
* .
*
* - After an issue has been moved to the Acknowledged state, then a developer will
* review to determine if the issue exists, and if so, to move it to the
* Confirmed state. If additional information is required, the issue may be moved
* to Feedback state.
*
* - An issue reaches the Confirmed state when the issue has been verified to
* exist. Issues that are Confirmed may also contain patches that provide
* additional debugging information.
*
* - Issues that have patches that require testing and feedback from the community
* are then placed in the Ready for Testing status.
*
* - Once a patch has been tested and confirmed to resolve the issue, we change the
* status to Ready for Review.
*
* - An issue that is Ready for Review needs to be looked over by a developer, or
* placed on Reviewboard (for larger patches) prior to being commited. Issues
* that are in Ready for Review are typically ready, or nearly ready to be
* commited.
*
* - Once an issue has been commited, svnbot will then Close the issue if the
* correct keywords are used in the commit message (see Guidelines for Commit
* Messages)
* .
* <hr/>
* \section Notes Notes
*
* -# Using the "Need Triage" filter is useful for finding these issues quickly.
* -# The issue tracker now has the ability to monitor the commits list, and if
* the commit message contains something like, "(Closes issue #9999)", the bug
* will be automatically closed.\n
* See http://www.asterisk.org/doxygen/trunk/CommitMessages.html for more
* information on commit messages.
*
* \section ReleaseBranchCommitPolicy Release Branch Commit Policy
*
* The code in the release branches should be changed as little as possible. The
* only time the release branches will be changed is to fix a bug. New features
* will never be included in the release branch unless a special exception is made
* by the release branch maintainers.
*
* Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a patch is considered to fix a
* bug or if it is a new feature. Patches that are considered code cleanup, or to
* improve performance, are NOT to be included in the release branches. Performance
* issues will only be considered for the release branch if they are considered
* significant, and should be approved by the maintainers.
*
* If there is ever a question about what should be included in the release branch,
* the maintainers should be allowed to make the decision.
*/