Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthew Jordan ca61a05506 Handle an originated channel being sent into a non-empty bridge
Originated channels are a bit odd - they are technically a dialed channel (thus
the party B or peer) but, since there is no caller, they are treated as the
party A. When entering into a bridge that already contains participants, the CDR
engine - if the CDR record is in the Dial state - attempts to match the person
entering the bridge with an existing participant. The idea is that if you dialed
someone and the person you dialed is already in the bridge, you don't need a new
CDR record, the existing CDR record describes the relationship.

Unfortunately, for an originated channel, there is no Party B. If no one was in
the bridge this didn't cause any issues; however, if participants were in the
bridge the CDR engine would attempt to match a non-existant Party B on the
channel's CDR record and explode.

This patch fixes that, and a unit test has been added to cover this case.



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@393164 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
2013-06-28 17:31:33 +00:00
Matthew Jordan 6258bbe7bd Update Asterisk's CDRs for the new bridging framework
This patch is the initial push to update Asterisk's CDR engine for the new
bridging framework. This patch guts the existing CDR engine and builds the new
on top of messages coming across Stasis. As changes in channel state and bridge
state are detected, CDRs are built and dispatched accordingly. This
fundamentally changes CDRs in a few ways.
(1) CDRs are now *very* reflective of the actual state of channels and bridges.
    This means CDRs track well with what an actual channel is doing - which
    is useful in transfer scenarios (which were previously difficult to pin
    down). It does, however, mean that CDRs cannot be 'fooled'. Previous
    behavior in Asterisk allowed for CDR applications, channels, and other
    properties to be spoofed in parts of the code - this no longer works.
(2) CDRs have defined behavior in multi-party scenarios. This behavior will not
    be what everyone wants, but it is a defined behavior and as such, it is
    predictable.
(3) The CDR manipulation functions and applications have been overhauled. Major
    changes have been made to ResetCDR and ForkCDR in particular. Many of the
    options for these two applications no longer made any sense with the new
    framework and the (slightly) more immutable nature of CDRs.

There are a plethora of other changes. For a full description of CDR behavior,
see the CDR specification on the Asterisk wiki.

(closes issue ASTERISK-21196)

Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2486/



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@391947 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
2013-06-17 03:00:38 +00:00