[MRG] merge with lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-purchase-coverage-ksa
bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111213064107-73i8f2km3u9lqxn9
This commit is contained in:
Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)
commit
d8b58b2c8f
|
|
@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Dashboard for purchase management that includes:
|
|||
'test/process/run_scheduler.yml',
|
||||
'test/process/merge_order.yml',
|
||||
'test/process/edi_purchase_order.yml',
|
||||
'test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml',
|
||||
'test/ui/print_report.yml',
|
||||
'test/ui/duplicate_order.yml',
|
||||
'test/ui/delete_order.yml',
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,13 @@
|
|||
I confirm the purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase4}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I changed Expected Date to Next Day.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
next_day = (datetime.date.today()+datetime.timedelta(days=1))
|
||||
self.write(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")], {'minimum_planned_date': next_day})
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check the "Approved" status after confirmed RFQ.
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|||
-
|
||||
In order to test the flow, I start it from confirmed purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase6}
|
||||
-
|
||||
In order to test create invoice for purchase order line.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
|
||||
invoice_line_obj = self.pool.get('purchase.order.line_invoice')
|
||||
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase6"))
|
||||
context.update({'active_model': 'purchase.order', 'active_ids': [ref("order_purchase6")]})
|
||||
for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
|
||||
invoice_line_obj.makeInvoices(cr, uid, purchase_line.id, context=context)
|
||||
assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
|
||||
assert purchase_line.invoiced == True
|
||||
assert len(purchase_line.invoice_lines) == 1, "Invoice line should be generated."
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ that exceeds minimum amount set by configuration wizard.
|
|||
'purchase_double_validation_installer.xml',
|
||||
'board_purchase_view.xml'
|
||||
],
|
||||
'test': ['test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'],
|
||||
'test': [
|
||||
'test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml',
|
||||
'test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'
|
||||
],
|
||||
'demo_xml': [],
|
||||
'installable': True,
|
||||
'active': False,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
|
||||
partner_id: base.res_partner_desertic_hispafuentes
|
||||
order_line:
|
||||
- product_id: product.product_product_pc4
|
||||
product_qty: 10
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
|
||||
partner_id: base.res_partner_vickingdirect0
|
||||
order_line:
|
||||
- product_id: product.product_product_hdd2
|
||||
product_qty: 10
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|||
-
|
||||
I Create new limit amount from Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
|
||||
limit_amount: 3000
|
||||
-
|
||||
Then I set the Limit Amount.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
|
||||
self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
|
||||
-
|
||||
Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
|
||||
installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
|
||||
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase11"))
|
||||
assert purchase_order.amount_total >= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
|
||||
-
|
||||
In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
|
||||
- state == 'confirmed'
|
||||
-
|
||||
I Approved the purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase11}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
|
||||
- state == 'approved'
|
||||
-
|
||||
Test for purchase double validation in which Total < = Limit Amount.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.order}: |
|
||||
installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
|
||||
purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
|
||||
assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Less then the Limit Amount"
|
||||
-
|
||||
I confirmed the purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I Approved the purchase order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase12}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order has transmit to approved state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
|
||||
- state == 'approved'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,117 +0,0 @@
|
|||
-
|
||||
I Create new limit amount from Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
|
||||
limit_amount: 3000
|
||||
-
|
||||
Then I set the Limit Amount
|
||||
-
|
||||
!python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
|
||||
self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
|
||||
-
|
||||
In order to test the purchase double validation flow,I start by creating a new product 'MOB1'
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: product.product, id: product_product_mob1}:
|
||||
categ_id: 'product.product_category_3'
|
||||
cost_method: standard
|
||||
mes_type: fixed
|
||||
name: MOB1
|
||||
price_margin: 2.0
|
||||
procure_method: make_to_stock
|
||||
property_stock_inventory: stock.location_inventory
|
||||
property_stock_procurement: stock.location_procurement
|
||||
property_stock_production: stock.location_production
|
||||
seller_delay: '1'
|
||||
standard_price: 2000.0
|
||||
supply_method: buy
|
||||
type: product
|
||||
uom_id: product.product_uom_unit
|
||||
uom_po_id: product.product_uom_unit
|
||||
volume: 0.0
|
||||
warranty: 0.0
|
||||
weight: 0.0
|
||||
weight_net: 0.0
|
||||
-
|
||||
In order to test the purchase double validation flow,I create a new record where "invoice_method" is From Order.
|
||||
-
|
||||
Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
|
||||
-
|
||||
I create purchase order for MOB1 for 3 quantity.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
|
||||
company_id: base.main_company
|
||||
date_order: '2011-01-1'
|
||||
invoice_method: order
|
||||
location_id: stock.stock_location_stock
|
||||
order_line:
|
||||
- date_planned: '2011-01-11'
|
||||
name: MOB1
|
||||
price_unit: 2000.0
|
||||
product_id: 'product_product_mob1'
|
||||
product_qty: 3.0
|
||||
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
|
||||
state: draft
|
||||
partner_address_id: base.res_partner_address_7
|
||||
partner_id: base.res_partner_4
|
||||
pricelist_id: purchase.list0
|
||||
-
|
||||
Initially purchase order is in the draft state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
|
||||
- state == 'draft'
|
||||
-
|
||||
I confirm the purchase order for MOB1.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_po11}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
|
||||
- state == 'confirmed'
|
||||
-
|
||||
I Approved purchase order by Supplier for MOB1.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: purchase_order_po11}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
|
||||
- state == 'approved'
|
||||
-
|
||||
Test for purchase double validation in which Total < Limit Amount.
|
||||
-
|
||||
I create purchase order for MOB1 for 1 quantity.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
|
||||
company_id: base.main_company
|
||||
date_order: '2011-01-02'
|
||||
invoice_method: order
|
||||
location_id: stock.stock_location_stock
|
||||
order_line:
|
||||
- date_planned: '2011-01-12'
|
||||
name: MOB1
|
||||
price_unit: 2000.0
|
||||
product_id: 'product_product_mob1'
|
||||
product_qty: 1.0
|
||||
product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
|
||||
state: draft
|
||||
partner_address_id: base.res_partner_address_7
|
||||
partner_id: base.res_partner_4
|
||||
pricelist_id: purchase.list0
|
||||
-
|
||||
Initially purchase order is in the draft state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
|
||||
- state == 'draft'
|
||||
-
|
||||
I confirm the purchase order for MOB1.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_po12}
|
||||
-
|
||||
I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to approved state.
|
||||
-
|
||||
!assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
|
||||
- state == 'approved'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue