In the case of custom fields, the field's parameters were set up without the
field being present in the class hierarchy. Because of this, the parameter
inheritance mechanism was missing the field itself. As a consequence, custom
selection fields ended up without selection, for instance :-/
The ISO week-year notation can produce confusing values
when the first week of the year is so short that it
becomes week 0 and is considered the last week of the
previous year, depending on the locale.
For instance, using ISO notation:
'W53 2015' == dates.format_date(
date(2015,1,1), format="'W'w YYYY", locale='en_GB')
'W53 2005' == dates.format_date(
date(2006,1,1), format="'W'w YYYY", locale='de_DE')
This is surprising but actually valid.
However it definitely yields wrong output when combined with
months formats:
'January 2014' == dates.format_date(
date(2015,1,1), format="MMMM YYYY", locale='en_GB')
As a result we must always use `y` to denote the year in
any date format, *except* when it is combined with the
week number `w`, in which case we must use `Y`.
See the documentation at:
http://babel.pocoo.org/docs/dates/#date-fields
Compute methods could give results that should not be considered as default
values. For instance, a related field usually defaults to a null value, which
is then set to the field with its inverse method by create(). This may violate
a non-null constraint if the original field is required. Therefore, compute
methods are no longer used to determine default values.
The method _prefetch_field() was accidentally prefetching fields to recompute;
which was skipping the actual recomputation, since a value was put in cache.
But sometimes the field's value was fixed by an extra recomputation of the
field. Here we remove the extra recomputation and fix the cache corruption.
Rev f2cf6ced1 modified RFC2822 parsing in order to better support
unicode characters inside the Name part of an address header.
However the patch broke handling of multiple addresses (comma
separated) - silently discarding all recipients except the
first one, as soon as any non-ASCII character was present.
This patch restores the functionality while preserving the
fix from f2cf6ced1, and simplifies the code using email.utils
utility functions.
Fixes (again) lp:1272610, OPW 607683
An issue occurs when a constraint is checked before computed fields are marked
for recomputation: the constraint will read the field's current value, which
may be wrong. If the field is marked soon enough, the constraint will trigger
the recomputation and use a correct value.
Because of the parameter overriding mechanism implemented by fields, it is no
longer necessary to copy field objects. It is even better to no copy them in
the case of related fields.
If an email contains several text/html parts inside a multipart email, the previous code was only keeping the last content part.
The Content-Type: multipart/mixed allows several independent part (RFC1341 7.2.2), so two html is technically valid.
With this patch, the two parts are concatenated. (opw 614755)
Modify append_content_to_html regex to make sure the regex keeps the content of the html instead of removing it.
e.g.: "123 <html> 456 </html> 789" used to be stripped to "123 789" while we expect "123 456 789"
This solves a subtle issue: in the following case, the class Bar should
override the default value set by Foo. But in practice it was not working,
because _defaults is looked up before field.default.
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'foo': fields.char('Foo'),
}
_defaults = {
'foo': "Foo",
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
foo = fields.Char(default="Bar")
The change makes field.default and the model's _defaults consistent with each
other.
also fix the corresponding text and add explicit sequence number because I
don't understand what the bloody hell it does without that, except that it's
not the right thing. At all.
Consider the following example:
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'state': fields.selection([('a', 'A')]),
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
state = fields.Selection(selection_add=[('b', 'B')])
The attribute 'column' of the field does not have the full selection list,
therefore the column object cannot not be reused, even a copy of it. The
solution is to systematically recreate the column from the field's final
specification, except for function fields that have no sensible way for being
recreated.
* fix mapping handling to match JS impl: current value set as _value instead
of being lost
* add handling of integer parameter
* only set _size and _last if current iterable is sized
Changed render_att_att to return an iterable of pairs instead of a pair, and
dispatched t-att on whether its result is a Mapping.
Also changed qweb test runner so it uses ordereddict for JSON mapping in
params, otherwise iteration order (and thus order of attributes in output) is
unpredictable and results don't/can't match expectations (as both are
strings).
Note that this relies on JS implementation details wrt iteration order of
mappings. Tests would probably be somewhat less brittle if rendering output
was parsed to XML... if that's possible (?)
* document qweb based (mostly) on JS version
* convert JS qweb tests to (mostly) language-independent XML so they can be
used for JS and Python implementations
* add some more tests (e.g. precedence between t-value and body in t-set)
* remove ``t-import``
* fix parity in foreach(dict) (and rename some variables to make array and
object versions more similar)
When processing data files during a module installation/upgrade, not all fields
are set up yet, in particular relational custom fields. Make fields_get()
ignore those fields, so that views can be created/updated and validated,
provided they do not refer to those fields...
A security has been introduce in eb9113c04d to restrict access to orphan attachments to employees only
Assets need to be build and accessed as superuser, thus
Raphael Collet
Christophe Simonis
Olivier Dony
Jeremy Kersten
Denis Ledoux
Xavier Morel
Martin Trigaux
Martin Zlámal