The ISO week-year notation can produce confusing values
when the first week of the year is so short that it
becomes week 0 and is considered the last week of the
previous year, depending on the locale.
For instance, using ISO notation:
'W53 2015' == dates.format_date(
date(2015,1,1), format="'W'w YYYY", locale='en_GB')
'W53 2005' == dates.format_date(
date(2006,1,1), format="'W'w YYYY", locale='de_DE')
This is surprising but actually valid.
However it definitely yields wrong output when combined with
months formats:
'January 2014' == dates.format_date(
date(2015,1,1), format="MMMM YYYY", locale='en_GB')
As a result we must always use `y` to denote the year in
any date format, *except* when it is combined with the
week number `w`, in which case we must use `Y`.
See the documentation at:
http://babel.pocoo.org/docs/dates/#date-fields
Compute methods could give results that should not be considered as default
values. For instance, a related field usually defaults to a null value, which
is then set to the field with its inverse method by create(). This may violate
a non-null constraint if the original field is required. Therefore, compute
methods are no longer used to determine default values.
The method _prefetch_field() was accidentally prefetching fields to recompute;
which was skipping the actual recomputation, since a value was put in cache.
But sometimes the field's value was fixed by an extra recomputation of the
field. Here we remove the extra recomputation and fix the cache corruption.
The customer can change the country and tax
number in the billing information during
checkout, and the taxes should be properly
updated according to the re-detected fiscal
position.
The fiscal position detection also depends
on the `vat_subjected` flag, which we now assume
to be implicit as soon as the customer filled
in a valid Tax Identification Number.
An issue occurs when a constraint is checked before computed fields are marked
for recomputation: the constraint will read the field's current value, which
may be wrong. If the field is marked soon enough, the constraint will trigger
the recomputation and use a correct value.
Instead of just hidding it
Otherwise, when opening a new dialog, it is considered that there is a previous opened dialog, and this can lead to refresh the record which opened the hidden/previous dialog
This is related to rev. 57b48602fb
Because of the parameter overriding mechanism implemented by fields, it is no
longer necessary to copy field objects. It is even better to no copy them in
the case of related fields.
I tried starting a better one, but the workflow code is a complete mess so I
have no idea how this thing works without significant study and testing.
Thus, not trying to write a brand new and complete doc, maybe later.
This solves a subtle issue: in the following case, the class Bar should
override the default value set by Foo. But in practice it was not working,
because _defaults is looked up before field.default.
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'foo': fields.char('Foo'),
}
_defaults = {
'foo': "Foo",
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
foo = fields.Char(default="Bar")
The change makes field.default and the model's _defaults consistent with each
other.
also fix the corresponding text and add explicit sequence number because I
don't understand what the bloody hell it does without that, except that it's
not the right thing. At all.
To allow the on change to set the product default unit of measure when changing of product, and only in this case (not when changing price or quantity)
Consider the following example:
class Foo(models.Model):
_name = 'foo'
_columns = {
'state': fields.selection([('a', 'A')]),
}
class Bar(models.Model):
_inherit = 'foo'
state = fields.Selection(selection_add=[('b', 'B')])
The attribute 'column' of the field does not have the full selection list,
therefore the column object cannot not be reused, even a copy of it. The
solution is to systematically recreate the column from the field's final
specification, except for function fields that have no sensible way for being
recreated.
The old behaviour was not better, because when we print the invoice, the order was ugly:
Name
Street
Company name
Country
Now we will have:
Name
Company name
Street
Country
This patch is not retro-compatible:
Old partners will see the address in company name and vice-versa.
Need to update view and switch street field and street2 field
When the cron is running on a database with a large number of goals (e.g. website_forum with thousands of users), it's possible the CPU time is exceeded and we may have a rollback after sending some emails (for granted badges).
To avoid sending twice emails, commit in cron mode after each reward.