This can give a performance boost on large databases
and should not be a concern in terms of access control
as the inheritance already grants access to the parent
records.
management to access documents in notification emails, as well as for the
'view quotation' link in portal_sale module.
models: added a get_access_action method: basically, returns the action to
access a document. It uses the get_formview_action by default (form view
of the document). However for some documents we want to directly go to the
website, leading to an act_url action for some documents. This method allows
this behavior.
portal_sale: get_signup_url now uses the mail.action_mail_redirect method
instead of directly redirecting towards a portal menu. This allows to fall
back on a standard behavior.
portal_sale: get_formview_action updated, to match actions tailored for
portal users.
website_quote: get_access_action of sale order updated. If the sale order
has a template defined, the returned action is an act_url (website view
of the quotation), not the form action anymore.
mail: fixed signature + company signature in notification emails. Even without
user signature, the company signature + access link should be correct.
portal: signup url in notification emali was not using the mail redirection
as action. It is now the case.
Due to the use of a sudo env, the records
were being added to the sudo cache one by
one instead of all at once. This meant the
prefetching was not able to load all
records at once, leading to prohibitive
times when processing thousands of
records.
If a selection field is defined by a list as selection, such as:
state = fields.Selection([('a', 'A'), ('b', 'B')])
one can extend it by inheritance by redefining the field, as:
state = fields.Selection(selection_add=[('c', 'C')])
The result is that the selection field will have the list
[('a', 'A'), ('b', 'B'), ('c', 'C')] as selection.
As `_inherits` fields are now handled via `related`
fields (not stored, obviously), a new descriptor
`searchable` has been added to `fields_get()` result
to indicated if the field is searchable or not.
Singleton object was required while access model properties, but search returns multiple results and hence caused traceback while accessing record.property
The one2many field 'user_ids' was initialized with an incorrect value for the
inverse field 'wizard_id', using a res.users id. The latter was causing a
MissingError exception. The fix is simply to not define explicitly the inverse
field in the one2many.
Also did a small cleanup of the code of the wizard.
The existing code was buggy when writing on *2many fields with a list of
commands: the value was converted for the cache, but taking an empty recordset
as the current value of the field.
Before, the field purchase_ok was set as readonly on the product form if the product wasn't a variant, to avoid users to set all the products variants associated to the product template to be set as purchase able in one action.
We now consider that this can be done by the end user
It is not useful to try to create foreign keys when the destination model is
a PostgreSQL view for example.
We already do this kind of verifications but ir.actions and transient models
but did not for _auto.
- simplify the code by removing unused cases
- do not modify input argument 'value' of create/write
- do not call BaseModel.read() with reified group fields (this causes warnings)
of switching back to default screen.
This is used by the soon to be merged restaurant addon to create new orders
and display them at a particular screen. However, this behaviour is more
confusing in the other cases, so I'll think of a better way to solve this.