The tax_amount on account.move.line generated from the validation of an invoice
did not include the taxes with 'include in base amount' enabled.
Instead of using the line total, use the price_unit of the tax which is
correctly computed through compute_all method.
Fixes#5939
If the whole view relates to a specific group,
apply the group on the view itself instead of
each view part (each fields, each page, each div,...),
so the view is loaded / added to the base view
only if the user is in the right group.
So the view is not loaded uselessly
and the fields are not read for nothing
(performances & security).
Indeed, when a group is applied on a field itself, the field content
is read, but hidden, therefore reading the content of the field
uselessly, and potentially leading to accesses issues
if the user hasn't the rights to read the field.
(e.g. reading a property when not having access to the model
of the proprty, pricelists on partners for instance)
opw-634402
When duplicating confirmed bank statement lines,
the many2many `move_ids` links were preserved, and,
therefore, there were links between the duplicated
lines and the move entries of the original lines.
Closes#6617
This revision is related to dd47b6f5bc.
The above revision was allmost correct, except that, in a supplier
invoices, the `amount_currency` of the invoice is negative,
and the one of the bank statement is possitive.
To check that both are equal, we should subtract one to each other,
and check that the diff is 0, but both part need to be the
absolute value.
opw-634263
closes#6533
When processing the reconciliation of a bank statement
within the company currency with an invoice in a foreign currency,
avoid to recompute the bank statement debit / credit within
the currency rate at the time of the invoice when the
`amount_currency` of the bank statement line and the `amount_currency`
of the invoice move line are the same
(while having the invoice move line and the
bank statement move line in the same currency,
and having the bank statement currency and
the company currency the same),
to prevent gain/loss exchanges during currencies conversion.
Computing the amount of the statement line
within the currency of the invoice is useful
to compute the difference of amount paid within the company currency
when a change of currency rates occured between the invoice date
and the date of the payment.
Nevertheless, recomputing the amount in the currency of the company
is useless when the payment currency
and the company currency are the same,
and the amount of the invoice and the statement in the foreign currency
are identical, since the amount is already computed, within the
debit/credit field of the invoice move line.
Besides, this prevents gain/loss changes.
opw-631748
opw-632133
opw-631895
closes#6559
When the target currency is the company currency, there
is no need to re-compute the debit/credit amounts of the move lines,
since these debit/credit values already contains the amount
of the move line within the company currency.
Avoiding the recomputation prevents gain/loss during currencies exchanges
opw-631748
opw-632133
opw-631895
If a line of the invoice move was in a foreign currency
but its residual amount in this foreign currency was 0,
the `amount_residual` (in company currency) was used,
instead of the `amount_residual_currency`, which
is the residual amount in this foreign currency.
This was due to the fall back with the `and / or` statement.
Using `if / else` instead solves the issue.
This could lead to issues when the residual amount
in the foreign currency was 0, but the residual amount
in the company currency was 0.01, due to the exchange rate
loss.
In SQL, the addition/subtraction between NULL and an integer/numeric
returns NULL.
Therefore, if either debit or credit was set to null instead
of 0.0, debit-credit returned null, instead of the actual subtraction
opw-634044
- ctrl-enter only persist balanced reconciliations
- give a reconciliation proposition only if there's an unambiguous match
- added some missing tanslations
- use default order to display statement lines in reconciliation widget
When searching if a many2one property field is not set, there may be less
results since only the ones with a reference set to NULL are returned.
We should also get those not in the table.
This commit change this case so instead of returning ['id', 'in', {matching non-set ids}],
the ['id', 'not in', {matching set ids}] is returned.
e.g: if (1, 3, 8) are set, (5, 9) are not set. ['id', 'not in', (1, 3, 8)] would
be returned instead of ['id', 'in', (5, 9)] which might not select all non-set
property fields.
closes#6044
opw-631057
The SQL view implementing the "Invoice Analysis" report
JOINs the res.currency.rate table in order to obtain the
correct currency rate to convert each invoice line amount
in the same currency.
The matching of the rate needs to be done on the date
of that rate (`name` column) - the last rate preceding
the invoice date is presumed to be the right one.
However there is no simple way to make a direct JOIN between
account.invoice.line and res.currency.rate with a single
match, without using an ORDER BY clause and LIMIT 1.
This requires a costly SUBSELECT query for each invoice
line, quickly becoming prohibitive.
Through the use of PostgreSQL's Common Table Expressions
(CTE) it is possible to construct a temporary table
with the rates' start and end date of application.
This temporary table can then be used in a direct
JOIN with account.invoice.line, delivering much better
performance (no SUBSELECT needed for each invoice line)
On a database with 50k invoice lines this makes invoice
analysis return results in less than 800 ms instead of
10+ seconds.
The domain on account.account was preprocessed in search method but it had no
effect on read_group. This lead to inconsistency or errors when using 'goup by'
filter.
Move domain processing in '_where_calc' method instead as this is used by both
'search' and 'read_group'.
This reverts commit 24526b18a7.
The journal_id field is not present on account.account but is processed in
search method.
Next commit will improve the processing to also accept journal_id in read_group.
The function _unite_compute and _unit_compute_inv did not give the same display result.
Regardless the way the tax is computed, the display must be the same. The display must
only shows the name of the tax.
opw:633828
The Tax Report printed with details should not include draft accounting entries.
Technicaly, the account move lines include in a draft account move do not have to be
printed
opw:633642
The `tax_amount` of move lines is by default set to `0.0`.
Nevertheless, this default value is set by Odoo,
not by postgresql.
This is therefore likely that the `tax_amount` is set as
null instead of 0.0, in database.
Therefore, when getting this value directly with a SQL
request, this is possible that `null` will be returned.
Therefore, in this specific case, `res.get(record.id, 0.0`
could return `False`, if the sum of `tax_amount` is `null`,
and try to multiply a boolean with an integer is not possible:
`_rec_get(rec) * rec.sign`
opw-633903
The CSS on the linei with the "New" button of an bank statement
reconciliation wizard was only applied when there was only a multiple of
two "block" before.
Hence it worked when there was a multiple of 2 cases before, but if not
(for example when account_analytic_plans is installed) on:
- google chrome: the button is on the right (instead of on a line by its
own).
- firefox: idem, but also a difference in float display positioning
caused the parent container to not take floating elements into account
to calculate it's height.
This fix apply the CSS independently if the last block is even or odd.
Before this fix in firefox:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9977887/7315195/70ca5eca-ea6b-11e4-8892-1272f7ee0cb4.png
After this fix in firefox:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9977887/7315194/6e2b05ca-ea6b-11e4-9400-69c9cd587756.pngcloses#6459
opw-633703
Ensure correct sequence of bank statement action views.
As the views are sorted based on the sequence, make sure the tree is selected
before the form view.
Fixes#6413
When doing a manual reconciliation, the current filter could restrict the
visibility of move lines and show empty results for some partners (e.g. filter
the lists on only one partner will show empty list of moves for other partners).
This is also the case for multicompany restrictions.
Integrate the current filter to the search to only get results for displayed
lines.
Fixes#3817, opw 618134
Fixes#5221, opw 632095
The name field contains the refund reason.
The reason is filled when you create the refund
from the refund wizard available when
pressing "Ask Refund" on a supplier invoice.
As this field wasn't visibile on the supplier
invoice form, this wasn't possible to change
the reason on draft supplier refunds after
having created them through the wizard, while
you could change your mind or having done a
silly mistake in the wizard, that you could
edit since the invoice is stil draft.
This was also not possible to set a reason
when creating the refunds without going through
by the wizard.
This was also not possible to change the reason
when you duplicated your supplier refunds.
opw-632756
closes#6301
Fiscal year is created when a chart of account is installed on the company.
If no chart of account is installed, setting dates will have no effect in the
accounting configuration wizard.
Fixes#3547
Backport of 8.0 code, rev f61339b
Create a new journal item with an tax included, the automatically created tax
line had the amount computed as tax excluded.
Fixes#3731, opw 618305
contracts_count function field
&
journal_item_count function field
used for the "contracts" and "journal items" buttons
in the partner view are computed by the same
method.
But, this is possible that you have access to
one without having access to the other.
e.g., Project users not being salesman nor accountant
must have access to the contract counts,
but not to the journal items.
Besides, these buttons are added to the partner form
by two separated views, applied to analytic accounting group
& accountant group, respectively.
We therefore avoid to compute the journal items count when
not needed, when not loaded in the partner view.
We therefore prevent the access right issue, and provide
a performance improvment at the same time. Yay.
opw-632454
When generating the accounting entries, to compute the name, the invoice
reference (e.g. origin purchase order name) was first used before the supplier
invoice number. To facilate reconciliation of bank statements, the supplier
invoice number makes more sense.
Fixes#3839, opw 618765
When opening entries are generated, the reconcile_id field is updated in SQL
(probably for performances reasons) but the computed and stored field
reconcile_ref is not recomputed by the ORM.
Force the recomputation of the field by calling ORM method _store_set_values.
Fixes#4267, opw 620369
When printing the general ledger with "With Currency"
checked, two currencies were displayed in the colum
"Currency" when an amount was set, one time the company
currency, one time the move line currency. Only
the move line currency should be displayed.
Besides, the total of currencies amount
for each account should not display the currency symbol
at all, as the total may be composed of multiple currencies.
opw-632086
In the partner ledger wizard, you can check
a boolean to display the amount within the
currency the amount has been invoiced.
This feature was simply no more working
in Odoo 8.0.
opw-630268
The report generated by this wizard considered all the partners without taking into account
the filters and target entries set.
To show the right partner the function _set_context
must consider the "self.query" which sets the period, the dates, the states, the accounts and
the journals of the sql query used to give the demanded partner.
opw:631649
If a customer changed of company while having
account.move.line records in the former company he was in
It wasn't possible for someone else than the admin
to print the partner ledger report including this partner.
opw-631800
On an invoice, tax lines are generated in tax_line field. When modifying
manually the tax amount, the recomputed tax_amount field was incorrect in
multicurrency environment, leading to an entry with different tax amount and
debit value.
opw 611474
"Invoiced" stat button on the res.partner form view must not include cancelled and draft invoices.
The button triggered an action which shows a tree view with invoices where:
type in ['out_invoice'] and all states.
Now the button triggers a tree view with invoices where: type in ['out_invoice' , 'out_refund']
and state not in ['draft', 'cancel'].
opw:472318
On a line write in a account.move.line tree view, the on_write return all the
sibling move lines of the written move line. The lines are then displayed even
if they do not match the current search domain.
This fix adds the context on the given on_write callback request, and in
on_create_write use a on_write_domain in this context to filter the returned ids.
fixes#3161, closes#5727
opw-630093
It is possible, if the user created a new country by himself, to have a country without a code, we then need to check that.
Fixes opw 629891, where the customer wrote "Belgie" trying to find "België", didn't find it and created a new "Belgie" country without code.
The domain on the partner field in the bank statement lines
was too restrictive: You should be able to select partners
that aren't either customer or suppliers. For instance, your
employees.
opw-630017
when a customer invoice is created directly,
if a product variant is selected,
it now computes the price from the product variant and
not from the product template.
opw: 629285
When having account installed, but having as only
access right "Contacts creation", it wasn't possible to
display the partner form.
Setting the "groups" on the button itself has as effect
to hide the button, but not to prevent its value computation.
If you did not had the access rights required to compute the
buttons values, it leaded to security issues.
Put the "groups" on the view instead prevent the button to be loaded,
and its value to be computed. It therefore avoids both
a useless computation (computing the value of a hidden button
is not really useful), and prevent any access rights warnings.
Besides, 3 different groups were needed to display the
three buttons:
- account.group_account_invoice
- account.group_account_user
- analytic.group_analytic_accounting
Not having one of these tree groups could lead to security
warnings. We therefore split this view into three sub-views,
with each one a group set (and a button)
opw-628668
Many trivial changes to journal items, such as the
"blocked" flag for litigation (follow-up), do not affect
the balance of the whole entry. These should not cause
the account.move to be (re)validated.
For example it should be possible to change trivial
fields even on journal entries recorded in a closed
fiscal period.
Since all the lines in a partial reconciliation share the same state and the same amount_residual, we need to keep only one 'result' line.
It was the first line found that was kept ; now it's the line whose amount is greater than amount_residual, whiwh most likely is the significant one.
Fixes#5129
In a workflow context (for instance, in the invoice workflow),
context is not passed.
Therefore, relying on the 'recompute' key being the context
in order to not recompute the fields does not work with Workflows.
It leads to huge performance issues,
as fields are recomputed recursively (instead of sequentially)
when several records are implied.
For instance, when reconciling several invoices with one payment
(100 invoices with 1 payment for instance),
records of each invoice are recomputed uselessly in each workflow call
(for each "confirm_paid" method done for each invoice).
With a significant number of invoices (100, for instance),
it even leads to a "Maximum recursion depth reached" errror.
closes#4905
When having an invoice with multiple lines having the same
product_id and account_id, the residual amount was wrong.
This is due to the fact the residual amount of each line
was computed on the residual amount of the invoice divided
by the number of lines of the invoice, and the fact the main
select of the sql view was grouped by product_id, account_id.
So, for an invoice defined as
Product Account Total
A 1 10
A 1 10
B 1 10
The invoice analysis, grouped by product, account, computed
Product Account Total Residual
A 1 20 10
B 1 10 10
The residual amount '10' of the first line being
30 (the residual amount of the invoice)
divided by 3 (the number of lines in the invoice)
The residual amount of the invoice should actually be divided by
the number of lines in the invoice * the count
of occurences in the group by clause
So, in this case, (30 / 3) * 2 = 20
Replacing the big jointure by
SELECT count(*) FROM account_invoice_line l where invoice_id = ai.id
to get the number of lines in the invoice
is just an optimization for performances
opw-621672
Christophe Simonis
xmo-odoo
Joao Alfredo Gama Batista
Denis Ledoux
Stéphane Bidoul
Matthieu Dietrich
Goffin Simon
Nicolas Martinelli
Arthur Maniet
Nicolas Lempereur
Olivier Dony
Mohammad Alhashash
Richard deMeester
Martin Trigaux
Somesh Khare
rmu-odoo
Commandant Custo
han-odoo
Rifakathusen Haradwala
nachosalvador
Laurent Mignon
David Monjoie
Laetitia Gangloff
Denis Michiels
