Revert the modification from commit 8ae67f6a54 ; it appears that the test of required field is done before the computation of the related field and that leads to a Validation Error.
As the field employee_id is already required and the user_id is related to this field, the attribute required is redundant and unecessary.
When we return goods and a refund is created, we check the purchase order
linked to the original move. Therefore, the appropriate currency and unit
prices will be chosen.
opw-643085
The price without taxe must be rounded on each line like 'price_subtotal' in "sale.order.line"
with digits_compute= dp.get_precision('Account').
The total taxes included must be the sum of the rounded total without taxe and
the rounded taxes like in "sale.order" in _amount_all.
opw:643254
Returning `picking_id` can be useful for overrides.
In addition, when there is no return statement,
the method basically returns None.
As this is a public method (not beginning with '_'), it can
be called with an xmlrpc call, and `None` is not an
accepted return value for the xmlrpc protocol.
Closes#1714
A variable "lines" is instancied few lines above,
with the exact same browse call, and there is no
operation that could lead to an update of the result
between these two browse calls.
Closes#1394
When confirming a sales order with invoicing control
based on "Delivery order", confirming the quotation
didn't post the "Quotation Confirmed" message
subtype in the sales order thread.
opw-642744
During tests, some creation of user records would unnecessarily trigger
password reset or set a password, both of which would trigger password
hashing which takes some time (for good reasons).
Fix by:
* passing no_reset_password in YAML tests and some Python tests still
missing it (a number of Python tests already used it)
* removing passwords from YAML records as they're never necessary, the
test user records are not expected to ever log in
Incoming shipments are marked red according to creation date which does
not really make much sense.
closes#1061
note: it was already like this in 8.0 with 201f1c323
When creating an event in at 4 pm,
while being in UTC +2 (Europe/Brussels),
The start date sent to Google was set as
'2015-07-03T16:00:00+02:00',
but the timezone was described as 'UTC', giving
therefore giving contradictory information.
At the end, in the google calendar,
the event was set in the UTC timezone,
while it should have been set in GMT +2 (Europe/Brussels).
opw-640825
When column 'writeoff_amount' gets displayed on a tree view and function
_get_writeoff_amount() is called with multiple ids, the returned amounts keeps
getting bigger every row.
Closes#7211
Before this rev.,
if you define a carrier
- without advanced price rules
- with a normal price set to 0.0
- Free if more than amount unchecked
When you try to invoice a delivery order
(coming from a sales order with as invoicing policy
"on delivery order)
No grid was found, while there was one, with as price 0.0
Closes#1364
The amount total computed for pos order must be the sum of the rounded tax amount
and the rounded untax amount. Inspired from _amount_total in "sale.order".
opw:643254
Don't retrieve the binary contents just to display the size, but pass context
with bin_size=True instead
Always pass filename in download link
Combination of patches from the bug report from Enrico Ganzaroli, Cedric Le
Brouster and Holger Brunn
Fixes#4899, lp:1167429
View validation accounts for a fair cost of module installation, most of
that is spent checking for view validity, and a significant fraction
of *that* is spent reading the validated view from the DB.
Turns out _check_xml requested *all* view fields even though it needed
none of them save for the arch. Specifying fields to read_combined
rather than fetching all fields seems to result in a ~30% speedup of
_check_xml (under line_profiler). Most of the rest is spent fetching
sub-views (in get_inheriting_view_arch), I don't know that it can be
improved without hand-crafting a fairly complex SQL request.
In account_budget module,
when creating a budget position,
the user can select view accounts and also accounts with consolidation children,
in addition to normal accounts.
However, when viewing budgets with positions containing only view accounts,
the "practical amount" field was always zero.
Since these type of accounts are accepted as budget positions,
the system should take into account children and consolidation children
when computing the practical amount.
Fixes#372Closes#1247
Don't preload company logo of the wrong company
When a user other than the admin signed in
and was in a company different than the admin
and this company had a different logo,
the company logo (in the upper left corner)
displayed the logo of the admin company,
instead of the logo of the company of this
user.
As soon as the user refreshed the page
in his browser, the issue was resolved,
but the logo should be the good one
from the beginning.
Closes#1453
florent.thomas
Jonathan Nemry
Mohammad Alhashash
Martin Geubelle
Martin Trigaux
Nicolas Martinelli
Max Hellwig
SauliusZ
Pedro M. Baeza
Ludwik Trammer
Goffin Simon
Stéphane Bidoul
Odoo Translation Bot
Daniel Dico
André Paramés
Denis Ledoux
Xavier Morel
Tam Vu
andrius-preimantas
Nicolas Bustillos
Carlos Alberto Cipriano Korovsky
Developer Team
Lionel Sausin (Numérigraphe)
Nicolas Piganeau
Robin Lucbernet
Stefan Rijnhart
Miku Laitinen
Joao Alfredo Gama Batista
Laetitia Gangloff