Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
The production routing is ignored when creating previous movements
Current behavior before PR:
When you create a production that does not have a routing established in the BOM, and you set a route manually, it is ignored when creating the previous movements
It was like that for the date field, which is taken into account for the forecast quantity,
but in the view the scheduled date field is shown. We put the scheduled date equal to the date.
That way it is clear to the user when the products are foreseen to be consumed.
This is a performance revision.
Some stored functions field were recomputed uselessly.
In mrp, `hour_total` and `cycle_total` were recomputed
at each write on `mrp.production`, while they should be recomputed
only when there is a change on the `workcenter_lines` field,
or when there is a change in the `hour` or `cycle` field
of these `workcenter_lines`.
In stock, `min_date`, `max_date` and `priority` of
`stock.picking` were recomputed each time a new move
was added to the picking,
wether or not the 'expected_date' of this move
was between the `stock.picking` `min_date` and `max_date`,
and the priority not greater.
In stock, `product_qty` of `stock.move` was recomputed
at each write on the `stock.move`, while it should be
recomputed only when there is a change in `product_id`,
`product_uom` or `product_uom_qty`, as the computation
method only depends on these three fields.
In stock_account, the `invoice_state` of `stock.picking`
was recomputed each time a new `stock.move` was associated
to the picking, wether or not the `invoice_state` of the move
was already the same than the `invoice_state` of the picking.
opw-643560
When a MO is cancelled, it sets the related procurements in exception.
This fix logs this action in the procurement chatter, for WMS administration
and maintenance purposes.
Manufacturing Orders can be created from procurements,
as SUPERUSER_ID, since the procurements can be processed
through the WH scheduler, which is always ran as SUPERUSER_ID
In such a case, the record rules are ignored, and a BOM
normally not accessible to a user thanks to the multi-company
record rule could be chosen as the BOM of the MO.
This revision forces to find a BOM from a specific company
in such a case.
opw-640120
Avoid ZeroDivisionError if a move is confirmed with quantity of 0 (when stored
in database where the rounding is done by the precision defined on product_qty
field.
Fixes#6439
Now it's possible to put a property on a bom line.
For example, the bom for an apple pie and for an apricot pie can be made
in a single bom.
Three lines are necessary in the bom of the product "pie":
- First line with product " dough" without property
- Second line, with product "apple" with property "apple" if you want an apple pie
- Third line, with product "apricot" with property "apricot" if you want an apricot pie
The type of this bom pie must be "set" to allow the customer to assemblate
his favorite pie by himself.
Now to sell an apple pie, you must create a SO with the product "pie" and
the property "apple".
In that way, the delivery order consists of two lines:
- dough
- apple
The bom related to the product in a sale line order must be
filtered by the function _bom_find. If two boms can be applied
on a product, the bom with the smallest sequence is applied.
opw:632558
The action_confirm function losses the context when called by a workflow.
To have the right translation, the lang of the user must be written in the context.
opw:632873
Relax the constraint on BoM to allow to have two different lines with the same
product. As the error message says, the purpose of the constraint was to forbid
having the manufactured product as one of the components but had this side
effect.
Such scenario of the same product twice makes sense when using the date
attributes on the lines (e.g. changing quantities)
opw 621468
In BOM, when performing an advanced search
on "BOM Lines" contains "a name"
all lines were returned, whatever the lines content.
This was due to the simple fact no field 'name'
was set on the mrp.bom.line model.
We set "product_id" as _rec_name, it seems the more
logical choice.
opw-631335
It is very cumbersome to define routes which have 2 step in on production for certain products with
procurement rules (e.g. Stock > Raw Materials Location > Production), when the
products are MTS elsewhere. That is why we add the possibility, which might be elaborated in the future,
to define rules e.g. from Stock > Production, which you can put on the product / product categories. These
rules will only define the procure_method for now.
ORM will show lines in production.move_lines even if done (which the domain should avoid)
when processing the production (as they are probably still in cache). We explicitly skip those lines.
When producing more with lots in consumed and produced, we added the consumed_for link as
the lot tracking requires to have this link between the consumed and produced moves.
The extra move of the produced goods should also be confirmed and not created as confirmed immediately.
That way it can still apply the push rules. (Gabriel Demmerle)
BOM Lines are ordered by a sequence field,
the "handle" widget makes even possible the lines reordering.
The order was respected within the mrp.production
(in o2m products to consume and consumed products)
but not within the mrp.product.produce wizard
opw-629629
When comparing a float value to 0.0,
it can happen the float value is very near to 0.0,
but not exactly 0. This is the point to use float_compare,
```float_compare(qty, 0, self.pool['decimal.precision'].precision_get(cr, uid, 'Product Unit of Measure'))´´´
will compare qty to 0, with the product unit of measure precision (0.01 by default).
So, if qty is equal to 0.00001, this means the qty is regarded as equal to 0.0.
(float_compare will return 1).
Upstream traceability on produced goods (serial number on finished product) was
broken due to wrong values in cache for production.move_lines2 after production.
Refresh the value of production after each action_consume to make such the state
of the cache is correct. opw 609450
Similar fix for manufactruing order not going in done state in some specific
configrations (e.g. some components being phantom BOM).
Again due to wrong cache state after consumption. opw 610515
Fixes#1296
The method test_if_product, used in the workflow to test that the mrp production is for a product (!= service), used to call the method _action_compute_lines in order to compute the production lines and determine from them the production type.
The thing is, the method _action_compute_lines, despite the fact it returns the lines of the production, actually creates the lines. So, just to test if the production was of product type, the productin lines were created, in database.
This rev. introduces a _prepare_lines method, which returns the computed production lines, without actually creating them in database, so the test_if_product method can test if the production is of product type without creating the production lines.
Therefore, production lines are now computed and created during the action_compute method, instead of computing them when the production was tested to get the production type.
Computing the lines before the action_compute has as side effect to not set the scheduled date of the work orders in module mrp_operations, at MO confirmation (as, on confirmation, the action_compute method is called only for productions for which the lines are not yet computed, and mrp_operations overide action_compute to set the scheduled date)
opw-620189
Pass group_id information when a manufacturing order is created from
a procurement to keep a better traceability and know the reason of stock.move
creation.
Fixes#4019
if the bom is phantom and has no line, we attempt to find a new bom with the default product uom
This is possible that we find the same bom that the current one
In such a case, we must not explode, to avoid recursion.
The field bom_id is required on a manufacturing order and deleting a mrp.bom would block the current mo.
Restrict the suppression for manufacturing order in progress.
Fixes#3417
This reverts commit 61a8971db5.
This rev. is from a 7.0 forward port b4d602fdd3379a0310ec0b9a56f9b88226
This is no longer needed in 8.0, with the new WMS
When validating a SO containing a `make to stock` + `manufacture` product
(with bom + orderpoint), we have the following stock moves:
* Product move
* Manufacturing order
Selling 1 such product would yield 2 as incoming quantity, an
inconsistency that this commit solves by setting the location_id of the
product move to the MO's location_dest_id (in the same fashion that
the create_pickings method does in an mts/buy case)
opw-616229
When consuming product, the main_production_move is set as the source of production (used for consumed_for parameter)
However the method action_consume now (since 661a204) returns the new moves (when spliting) instead of the original one. This means that the tracebility would fail.
jesusVMayor
Isaac Gallart Bochons
Anton Engelhardt
Josse Colpaert
Denis Ledoux
sve-openerp
Valentin Chemiere
Goffin Simon
Daniel-CA
Lionel Sausin
Christophe Simonis
Martin Trigaux
Nicolas Martinelli
Ravi Gohil
Akash Balar
Holger Brunn
Raphael Collet
Julien Legros
kevin wang