Add the possibility in the decorator to specify the `upgrade` and `downgrade`
functions that convert values between APIs. Both function have the same API:
upgrade(self, value, *args, **kwargs)
downgrade(self, value, *args, **kwargs)
The arguments ``self``, ``*args`` and ``**kwargs`` are the ones passed to the
method, following its new-API signature.
Fixes#4944, #7830.
project.task: use an onchange to update date_start when changing user_id.
Indeed date_start is automatically updated in the create / write. Without
the onchange, this may lead to errors related to date_start being greater
then date_end.
project.issue: code in create and write now takes into account date_open
values given to the method and avoid erasing them.
In issue however the onchange is not added. Indeed the date_open and
date_closed fields are not visible in the view. They are automatically
computed and used to compute statistics.
This is a backport of a fix in 9, revision 890f1302c7175e24887e66a2f8b973e72fb4c7e9.
In this revision a context key is added wshen evaluating server actions.
Notification emails created during a server action will be set in the queue
and not send directly.
Some fixes coming from V9 revision 2be1dfc1ed7c9814cd3dbf4eb4cc95f842f738c2. The
purpose is to avoid to send emails in batch and to limitate automatic
subscription.
- add a context key to use the email queue for notifications linked
to allocations created in batch. This way emails will be send asynchronously
and will not create a deadlock when having a lot of allocations to process.
- also fixed a missing context in a browse
The attribute `data-oe-*` (`data-oe-id`, `data-oe-model`, ...)
must not be added when rendering the assets, to avoid
having different assets content,
e.g. a different content for the assets_common,
according if the user is signed in or not,
if the user can edit the website or not.
A different content for an assets according to the
users rights or the user being signed in or not means
that the assets are permanently re-written in the filestore,
which is against the point of the assets.
The content of the assets (assets_common) must not be
different from time to time, it must always be the same
(except when installing a new module, obviously).
Adding the `data-oe` attributes was pointless for the assets
anyway, and prevented having an identical content all
the time, therefore rewritting the assets all the time
in the filestore.
opw-657046
When there is a quote template set on a sale order,
the email sent by default is the email
`Sales Order - Send by Email (Online Quote)`,
and this since 5153b2d281.
Therefore, there is no point to override the content of the
email template `Sales Order - Send by Email` to set
the quotation link in the email template, since this is not
this email which is being used for sales order with an
online quotation template.
Nevertheless, the link to the email quotation must be
put in the `Sales Order - Send by Email (Online Quote)`,
so the customer can access his online quotation directly
from the confirmation email, as it was designed and done
in the override of the `Sales Order - Send by Email`.
opw-657060
`partner_id` is not the `supplier` of the stock move,
this is the destination address:
`Optional address where goods are to be delivered,
specifically used for allotment`.
The supplier would be a related to the `partner_id`
of the `picking_id`.
Nevertheless, displaying the `supplier` in the `stock.move` list
is not useful. You should use the pickign list for that matter.
opw-656985
Closes#9219
When choosing use tasks / use issues, correctly update the project alias. Indeed
only the use issues checkbox had an onchange. This revision adds the onchange
on use tasks so that the method correctly computes the new alias destination model.
Also updated the _get_alias_models method to be more modular instead of hardcoding
values. Call super.
When sharing a survey, a mail.mail is created but the attachment were lost.
This is due to a missing command (6, _, ids) when creating records in
attachment_ids field (many2many).
Fixes#9364, opw 656742
Currently, the button "Send Email" next to the email address of an event
registration didn't work if a partner was not set.
This commit removes the button, thus removing the feature but partially
adds it back via the chatter suggested recipients in the same way it is
done for a lead.
It is still partially a feature regression since to work the viewing
user need more access rights (e.g read access right on res.partner)
than before.
closes#9486
opw-653127
If the invoicing policy of a PO is set to "Based on incoming shipments"
and the PO contains a product of type "service", it is never considered
as invoiced, and therefore reach the state "Done".
The reason is that no stock move is linked to this PO line, and
therefore it is never considered as invoiced since we check the invoice
state of the associated sotck moves.
This fix assumes that in this specific case, a PO line for a service is
always invoiced, since there is anyway no incoming shipment linked to
it.
opw-654317
The decimal precisions for the quantities, cost/supplier price
per unit of measure were not respected. It was always
set to 2 digits, whatever the configuration in the database
decimal precisions.
opw-653143
The group analytic.group_analytic_accounting should have access to the
account.analytic.default model. Otherwise, a user with only analytic
rights (along with another group which has access to the products, e.g.
Purchase) will not be able to see the product form view. Indeed, the
field rules_count requires an access to the model
account.analytic.default.
opw-653735
`Recheck availability` must ignore
the done or cancelled moves.
Otherwise, it raises the warning telling you cannot
unreserve a done move.
856b31719c/addons/stock/stock.py (L1899)
To reproduce the issue:
- Create a delivery order,
with 10 stockable product A
& 10 stockable product B,
mark as todo.
- Create a receipt,
with 5 stockable product A,
mark as todo & transfer.
- Cancel the move of stockable product B from the delivery order,
in Traceability -> Stock Moves.
- Come back to the delivery order, `check availability`,
then, `recheck availability`
Closes#9550
In check_writing report, amount is the content of the field amount_to_text that
we can not guarantee has been filled (done in onchange so could be avoided, also
for other languages, etc.)
Instead of potentially failing, double check amount is filled.
cf https://www.odoo.com/groups/59/14976615
In the `product.template` model,
when searching products within a category that doesn't exist,
all products were returned, while none should be returned.
For instance,
In Sales > Products,
In the search input, search with internal category:
"A category that doesn't exist",
all products were returned.
opw-649548
The variants on a product in the ecommerce can appear:
- naturally, not a list, colored square for color, ...
- in a list of radio button.
To have the second kind, we need to enable the "List View of Variants"
customize option.
One part of the code was not the same which cause an issue when saving
the image of the variant, it was saved on the product.template instead.
This commit add an "update_product_image" function which is now called
in both scenario.
first half of:
opw-654279
forward port note: in 9.0 website/image -> web/image
These onchanges were needless since it was already done by the
BufferedDataSet when we use alter_ids to add/remove ids/virtual ids from
the recordset.
The onchanges this commit remove were introduced with 6b907bb4d in
juliet 2012 whilst the onchange in the BufferedDataSet when using
dataset alter_ids was with dd747c096 in october 2012.
closes#8273fixes#7595
opw-644706
Partial backport of master (-> v9) commit 059230512.
for the issue when removing an invoice line from an account.invoice,
three onchange where triggered:
- ListView account.invoice.line unlink the line id from its dataset,
[[first onchange]]
-> the line id is removed from the dataset which trigger an onchange
after this is done (and the onchange is finished), the following
onchange happen:
-- remove each record of the Collection of the ListView
-> this remove the id of these record from the ListView List dataset
[[second onchange]]
-> this trigger an onchange albeit the dataset is not changed
(since it was already removed before the first onchange)
-> this trigger an onchange on the one2many_list of the ListView
which has the same dataset as the ListView
[[third onchange]]
-> so an onchange is called yet again.
this commit removes the second onchange in this case where we remove ids
already removed from the dataset.
closes#8273fixes#7595
opw-644706
<% are automatically escaped as soon as the wysiwyg tool
is used to edit the template.
The wysiwyg tool is not compatible with Jinja, and
it isn't expected to be.
To avoid to have this problem everytime when
editing the portal email templates, we use
a Jinja syntax compatible with the wysiwyg,
as a workaround.
opw-654223
When importing a module, if an error was raised
during the import, the traceback wasn't displayed
anywhere, making harder the debugging.
While it make sense to not display the entire traceback
to the user, in the web client, this is useful to
diplay the traceback in the logs, for debugging purposes.
opw-653882
Raphael Collet
Denis Ledoux
qdp-odoo
Thibault Delavallée
Julien Legros
Jairo Llopis
Lionel Sausin
Xavier Morel
Thomas Groutars
Martin Trigaux
Olivier Dony
Jesús Alan Ramos Rodríguez
michaelhwalther
Khwunchai Jaengsawang
Alex Comba
Panagiotis Issaris
Nicolas Lempereur
Nicolas Martinelli
Goffin Simon
Matthieu Dietrich
Odoo Translation Bot
Christophe Simonis
Manuel Vázquez Acosta
Atchuthan, Sodexis