The name_get of a product will use some information (e.g. default_code) based on the supplier.
The matching of the supplier should use the commercial_partner_id in case the supplier info are on the company and the partner_id in the context belongs to the company (e.g. creates quotation with a contact of the company).
Fixes#1219
This reverts commit d4972ffdb6.
Seems to break some cases, at least in _product_reserve from stock/stock.py
Actual use case:
SELECT product_uom, sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_dest_id=%s AND location_id<>%s AND product_id=3645 AND state='done' GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | 6
SELECT product_uom,-sum(product_qty) AS product_qty FROM stock_move WHERE location_id=%s AND location_dest_id<>%s AND product_id=%s AND state in ('done', 'assigned') GROUP BY product_uom;
returning 1 | -6
results += cr.dictfetchall()
total = 0.0
results2 = 0.0
for r in results:
amount = uom_obj._compute_qty(cr, uid, r['product_uom'], r['product_qty'], context.get('uom', False))
results2 += amount
total += amount
Total = 1, amount = -5
It should actually be
Total = 0, amount = -6
Fixes problem when we try to sell 12 units of a product and change it to 1 dozen,
the algorithm was then trying to recompute the original amount and was getting
12,0000048 as a result which was then passed to the ceiling method, getting 13.0!
See also previous commit and issue #1125, PR #1126
Modified product ceiling() to use float_round() with special mode
for rounding UP (away from zero), avoiding pathological cases where
float representations errors were ceiling to the superior unit.
Also added correspding tests for rounding_method=UP
Fixes issue #1125, and replaces PR #1126.
At 96f038a product-related fields were removed due
to an important product.template/product.product
refactoring. As the field values were simply
dropped, they may not be nullified when upgrading an
existing database. Forcing them to False will take
care of it.
When no order is forced, it's more user-friendly if the products are ordered by alphabetical order.
This will mainly be applied:
* In the list view in the back-end
* In the eCommerce, for products with equal website_sequence
When uninstalling/updating a module, we may execute unlink method on product.template before product.product. In such cases, the product is already removed after removeing the template (_inherits) and the chained unlink of the product would fail (traceback when browsing).
This can give a performance boost on large databases
and should not be a concern in terms of access control
as the inheritance already grants access to the parent
records.
Josse Colpaert
Denis Ledoux
Martin Trigaux
Christophe Simonis
Cedric Snauwaert
Grzegorz Krukar
Olivier Dony
Richard deMeester
Christophe Matthieu
Fabien Meghazi
Commandant Custo
rsi-odoo
Fabien Pinckaers
Hardik Ansodariya
kevin wang
Frederic van der Essen
Thomas Groutars