This is necessary for 2 reasons:
- when searching on Business documents the search domain will be
[('partner_id', 'child_of', 'ACME')] in order to match all
descendants, and it must match inactive children as well
- in other cases like for resolving IDs to update via store
triggers, it is necessary that 'child_of' returns inactive
children too.
The implementation is tricky because the ORM automatically
transform 'child_of' domains into recursive searches with
[('parent_id', 'in', ids)], which is the same query that the
reverse one2many 'child_ids' will also use to find contacts.
The overridden search() therefore matches this domain pattern
only when there is one criterion (to avoid side-effects in
other cases) and a dummy extra 'domain' was added to the
definition of the 'child_ids' o2m so it won't match.
The net result is that child_ids will not return inactive
children while child_of will return all descendants when
it is the only criterion. This is the expected behavior
whenever child_of is used on res.partner, because
it's safer to always show business documents.
The only side-effects will be for custom/manual search
calls with a single criterion of the form ('parent_id','in', x)
and those can be fixed by adding an extra domain
component ('active','=',True), just like child_ids does.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130419135756-2kbhwr23lygqdoob
This is not strictly necessary, but can be useful for other
modules in order to ease SQL reporting, without even needing
to store a denormalized copy of the "commercial partner" key
on the documents themselves.
Also renamed the Python fiel to something generic since
it now inherits multiple models.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130419134335-rhsg24f2uuwl3kla
The name `commercial_partner_id` better reflects its
purpose and the fact that it is a FK to a partner.
An extra indirection through a lambda function was
also added to the definition of the function field
to make it possible to override it in other modules
(otherwise the function is passed by copy directly
and cannot be inherited later)
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130418144533-owupfwn6h83q432x
integer/float fields were not offering auto-completion in search views,
making them unsearchable except via advanced search.
This patch adds the missing complete() function and removes the incorrect
value_from() function that did not conform to the 7.0 search view API.
It seemed to be a leftover of the 6.1 search field implementation
of get_value(), wrongly renamed for 7.0.
Also includes corresponding tests.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130418112001-388op1t8ugr0rhfn
This patch will be forward ported in trunk by changing the behaviour of account_period.find() in order to fetch the normal periods by default (account_period_prefer_normal will be True by default) because there are no business case i could think of where you'd like to get the opening period (except in the closure but it's held in a different way there). On the other hand, it's pretty easy to forget to put that key in the context and introduce a new bug that will select the opening period instead of the wanted one
bzr revid: qdp-launchpad@openerp.com-20130418102433-t52uj23trkpr8vnb
When extending a controller in-place (e.g. A(Controller), B(A)) and
providing the exact same _cp_path as parent (no-op) execution path
would go into handler for _cp_path overwriting and raise an assertion
error for overwriting of existing controller.
Except this is allowed (if ugly) pattern, so warn & ignore behavior
(it is harmless).
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20130418092405-wrmmrd648b9koefu
Failing to force a manual update of the mail module would cause
all composer wizards to display html contents without the WYSIWYG
editor, making it mostly unusable for regular users. Users are
not expected to always force an update of all modules after
updating to the latest source code.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130417081410-dwc33ymizlihvbng
When a record is activated, the listview will do some jiggling around
assigning the ids of internal dataset to the one shared between all
views, this is mostly for the case where one switches from a "grouped"
list view, so the form view only cycles on the "current" group.
Problem is, that internal dataset is not correctly synchronized with
the shared one, so when the id is removed from the shared dataset it
is *not* removed from the internal one(s), and when the switch is made
the ids from the internal dataset are set on the shared one and
reintroduce the deleted record, leading to the form view's incorrect
state.
Fix the issue by updating the dataset's ids list when a record is
deleted from the records tree.
Also extracted some stuff from DataSetSearch's unlink callback so it
can be overridden and is more stable across datasets.
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1161210 fixed
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20130416152000-06dbwkgdb8zlf9pc
Olivier Dony
Cedric Snauwaert
Launchpad Translations on behalf of openerp
Fabien Meghazi
Quentin (OpenERP)
niv-openerp
Xavier Morel
Antony Lesuisse
Stephane Wirtel
Vo Minh Thu
Thibault Delavallée