When having an invoice with multiple lines having the same
product_id and account_id, the residual amount was wrong.
This is due to the fact the residual amount of each line
was computed on the residual amount of the invoice divided
by the number of lines of the invoice, and the fact the main
select of the sql view was grouped by product_id, account_id.
So, for an invoice defined as
Product Account Total
A 1 10
A 1 10
B 1 10
The invoice analysis, grouped by product, account, computed
Product Account Total Residual
A 1 20 10
B 1 10 10
The residual amount '10' of the first line being
30 (the residual amount of the invoice)
divided by 3 (the number of lines in the invoice)
The residual amount of the invoice should actually be divided by
the number of lines in the invoice * the count
of occurences in the group by clause
So, in this case, (30 / 3) * 2 = 20
Replacing the big jointure by
SELECT count(*) FROM account_invoice_line l where invoice_id = ai.id
to get the number of lines in the invoice
is just an optimization for performances
opw-621672
A record rule exists on currencies but not on rates.
If creates multiple currencies with rate = 1, we could fetch the wrong one in
the search and get a security exception while trying to convert rates.
Fixes#3323, opw 626353
This rev. is related to 6641c61ce6
During the above revision, a new jointure has been added
with product_uom, on product template uom_id
The join link was wrong, it was:
- LEFT JOIN product_uom u2 ON u.id = pt.uom_id
and it must be:
- LEFT JOIN product_uom u2 ON u2.id = pt.uom_id
as the alias 'u' is the previous jointure, not this new one.
Besides, the uom_name is now the name
of the product uom of this second jointure
As the uom is now the product default uom
instead of the category reference uom
The groupby clause has been adapted, as the selection was slightly altered
Besides, grouping by u.uom_type, u.category_id was pointless
Prevent creating/modifying accounting entries made on close periods.
The period_id and journal_id field on a account.move.line is a related so was
silently (without write call) updated so did not triggered the call to
_update_journal_check while modiying the linked account.move
Force the check in the validation of the move. As the move can not be balanced
without going through this method, this will prevent posted entries in closed
accounting period.
Fixes#1633, opw 615886
When fetching the VAT reports for several periods, only the last period was took into account
This is due to the fact that a browse record assignation no longer works in Odoo 8.0 API
at least not the same way.
code.sum_period = sum_tax_add just do nothing in Odoo 8.0.
Besides, using the variable "code" outside its loop is kinda crappy.
If the report was printed from the tax codes list
Accounting > Configuration > Taxes > Tax codes
There is no information concerning what should be displayed (periods, details, etc.)
as the user did not printed the report from the wizard
(from Accounting > Reporting > Generic Reporting > Taxes > Taxes report)
We therefore set default values, in order the report to not crash
Nevertheless, the user has obviously to go through the wizard
if he wants to set a configuration different than the default one
Before 8.0, the field journal_entry_id did not exist.
For database coming from older release, like 7.0, this field is not filled in during the migration, because this is not possible.
Set the needaction to depend only on the journal_entry_id will have as effect to have every bank statement line entered when the database was under 7.0 to match the domain, while the needaction is made to display the number of records that need an action.
Besides, even in 8.0, this is possible that a line has not the journal_entry_id set, while not needing any actions (see 2bb38ca89d)
For bank statement line having an account_id, but no journal_entry_id, it is not possible to reconcile the line in the bank statement reconciliation tool, as a filter is applied to only reconcile lines having journal_entry_id AND account_id not set.
As written in the help message of the account_id field:
This technical field can be used at the statement line creation/import time in order to avoid the reconciliation process on it later on. The statement line will simply create a counterpart on this account
Not allowing the reconciling should not prevent to close the statement in such a case. The button "close" was displayed only when all lines had journal_entry_id set.
Once the bank statement reconcilation done, the back button should not come back to Home when it does not found the bank statement list in the breadcrumb history, but simply perform a history_back action, which will come back to the previous action, the statement form for instance.
opw-625397
Revert edbd0df
Instead of removing the demo data (demo data is our friend), make the test more
specific, adding a date to match the rate of 1.5289 all year long.
Old demo data hardcoded the currency rate of USD to 1.5289 at the half
of the year, introducting new year red runbot.
Using assertAlmostEquals to avoid values like 32.730000000000004
Partners totals were not correct if the partner paid partially an invoice in advance
For an invoice of 20.000 in the future, with a payment made in advance of 5000
The column not due must contains 20.000, as the amount is not yet due
One of the column 1-30, 30-60, ... (accordingly on when the payment was made). must contains -5000
The total should be 15.000
This is related to rev. db98434e85
rev. abe5c803a0 forgot some partial reconciliations when the date domain was other than BETWEEN (for instance, <= stop date or >= start date, alone, not between)
Besides, the rev. abe5c803a0 did not care about account move being posted or not.
rev. db98434e85 took several times the same partially reconciled moves lines
Denis Ledoux
Christophe Simonis
Martin Trigaux
Alexis de Lattre
Goffin Simon
Rifakat Haradwala
Olivier Dony
Arthur Maniet
Aaron Bohy
Xavier Morel
Arthur Maniet
Arthur Maniet
Guewen Baconnier
Somesh Khare
Paulius Sladkevičius
sve-openerp