This patch comes with a corresponding server-side patch (revision 4946 revid: odo@openerp.com-20130420032529-pvv6vuelp84bt26j)
- module-specific overrides of _commercial_fields() for all modules adding accounting/invoicing-related fields to res.partner
- corresponding changes to inherited views of res.partner form to hide these commercial fields when they are in fact "related fields" of their parent commercial entity. This mainly concerns 2 sections of the Partner form: the whole Accounting tab, and the bottom of the Sales&Purchase tabs with the pricelists and invoicing fields. These sections are replaced by a short message and a button to open the commercial entity to view/edit the fields
- a few fixes to properly delegate the resolution of various contact/address types to the corrected res.partner.address_get()
- changes to search views of the main business documents so that searching for a company name will also match its contacts
- a fix of the _find_accounting_partner() method that the account module uses to locate the partner to which journal entries must be linked - it will now use the same semantics as for "commercial entity"
- fix issue detected by Joël Grand-Guillaume in comment #34 of bug 1160365: when invoicing after delivery, the invoicing contact/address must be used rather than the main customer. Tests updated accordingly.
- add new 7.0 module "account_report_company": this module adds an extra stored field "commercial_partner_id" on Invoices to make reporting/aggregating by partner easier in the Invoice list and in the Invoice Analysis report. This module is expected to be merged in the main account module in the next major release. The module can be installed without any risk on any existing 7.0 databases.
This module also mitigates group_by issues on all models by adding a new stored function field `display_name` on res.partner that contains the name_get() result in the form "ACME, John Doe" and set it as the default _order for res.partner. This ensures that group_by entries for the same company will always be next to each other on all documents: "ACME" is directly followed by "ACME, John Doe", "ACME, John Anderson", etc. This field also replaces the `name` field in the list and kanban views of Partners, so that the display order matches the display labels.
- fixed unique constraints definition on some commercial fields on res.partner (l10n_ro)
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1160365 fixed
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130420034221-2wvf6rezwl7gog74
It works when installing the module but would break
everytime another module that inherits from res.partner
is installed/update from command-line (e.g. -i/-u crm),
as account_report_company is low in the dependency graph
so the field is dropped when the ORM notices that
the current field definition is not stored.
This can be solved in trunk by making the field stored
directly in 'base'.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130420015003-8y48xrb14cjif60w
This is not strictly necessary, but can be useful for other
modules in order to ease SQL reporting, without even needing
to store a denormalized copy of the "commercial partner" key
on the documents themselves.
Also renamed the Python fiel to something generic since
it now inherits multiple models.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130419134335-rhsg24f2uuwl3kla
integer/float fields were not offering auto-completion in search views,
making them unsearchable except via advanced search.
This patch adds the missing complete() function and removes the incorrect
value_from() function that did not conform to the 7.0 search view API.
It seemed to be a leftover of the 6.1 search field implementation
of get_value(), wrongly renamed for 7.0.
Also includes corresponding tests.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130418112001-388op1t8ugr0rhfn
This patch will be forward ported in trunk by changing the behaviour of account_period.find() in order to fetch the normal periods by default (account_period_prefer_normal will be True by default) because there are no business case i could think of where you'd like to get the opening period (except in the closure but it's held in a different way there). On the other hand, it's pretty easy to forget to put that key in the context and introduce a new bug that will select the opening period instead of the wanted one
bzr revid: qdp-launchpad@openerp.com-20130418102433-t52uj23trkpr8vnb
When extending a controller in-place (e.g. A(Controller), B(A)) and
providing the exact same _cp_path as parent (no-op) execution path
would go into handler for _cp_path overwriting and raise an assertion
error for overwriting of existing controller.
Except this is allowed (if ugly) pattern, so warn & ignore behavior
(it is harmless).
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20130418092405-wrmmrd648b9koefu
Failing to force a manual update of the mail module would cause
all composer wizards to display html contents without the WYSIWYG
editor, making it mostly unusable for regular users. Users are
not expected to always force an update of all modules after
updating to the latest source code.
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130417081410-dwc33ymizlihvbng
When a record is activated, the listview will do some jiggling around
assigning the ids of internal dataset to the one shared between all
views, this is mostly for the case where one switches from a "grouped"
list view, so the form view only cycles on the "current" group.
Problem is, that internal dataset is not correctly synchronized with
the shared one, so when the id is removed from the shared dataset it
is *not* removed from the internal one(s), and when the switch is made
the ids from the internal dataset are set on the shared one and
reintroduce the deleted record, leading to the form view's incorrect
state.
Fix the issue by updating the dataset's ids list when a record is
deleted from the records tree.
Also extracted some stuff from DataSetSearch's unlink callback so it
can be overridden and is more stable across datasets.
lp bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1161210 fixed
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20130416152000-06dbwkgdb8zlf9pc
If there are no grouping field specified *but* group_by_no_leaf is
specified, should call read_group with no grouping fields: will
generate a single group (which can not be opened) for all of the
model.
Necessary for analysis views since individual "records" make no sense.
bzr revid: xmo@openerp.com-20130416092344-2pqog8f7xprn6hsh
html fields are sanitized just before saving data into the database.
In the composer, this cause the sanitization of the templated
message (for mass mailing messages) before the rendering, forbidding
the use of templated html links.
The html of the message is sanitized by message_post()
bzr revid: chs@openerp.com-20130416083812-jvqeivfxhdr32djh
With the 7.0 model all accounting-related fields are synchronized
from company to contacts (both are res.partner records), so the
unique check is not a trivial unique constraint. It must be updated
to use a *partial unique index* that applies only to "commercial
entities" and not to contacts. The condition for being a commercial
entity is "is_company is true or parent_id is NULL".
If companies have unique vat/nrc numbers, then their contacts
will be consistent because they are automatically synchronized,
so the uniqueness between contacts does not have to be checked.
(The auto-sync is performed by res.partner automatically and covered
by tests in the "base" module)
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20130415175258-l15meqin80sbhggu
Launchpad Translations on behalf of openerp
Olivier Dony
niv-openerp
Fabien Meghazi
Quentin (OpenERP)
Xavier Morel
Cedric Snauwaert
Stephane Wirtel
Christophe Simonis
Thibault Delavallée
Christophe Matthieu